Vaginal birth after cesarean and the New England Journal of Medicine: A strange controversy

Birth

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 276-279

  Flamm, B L ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DELIVERY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MASS MEDIUM; PREGNANCY; PUBLICATION;

COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA; CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; PERIODICALS; PREGNANCY; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 0035654761     PISSN: 07307659     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2001.00276.x     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery
2. Vaginal delivery after cesarean section - Is the risk acceptable?
3. A risk is found in natural birth after cesarean
4. Vaginal births after C-section risk uterine damage
5. Study may have a chilling effect on VBAC rate
6. Vaginal delivery after caesarean section triples risk of uterine rupture
7. Use of hospital discharge data to monitor uterine rupture - Massachusetts, 1990-1997
8. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: Results of a 5-year multicenter collaborative study
9. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: A prospective multicenter study
10. Vaginal birth after cesarean: A meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality
11. Prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening: A multicenter study of patients with prior cesarean delivery
12. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery
13. Uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery: Maternal and fetal consequences
14. Once a cesarean, always a controversy
15. Placenta previa accreta and prior cesarean section
16. Maternal death due to rupture of a low transverse cesarean section incision during labor at home
17. Vaginal birth after cesarean: Reducing medical and legal risks