Re: Relative connective tissue graft size affects root coverage treatment outcome in the envelope procedure Yotnuengnit P, Promsudthi A, Terapat T, Laohapand P, Yuwaprecha W (2004;75:886-892). [1]

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 76, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1403-

  Tu, Yu Kang ^a   Gilthorpe, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONNECTIVE TISSUE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; HUMAN; LETTER; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TISSUE GRAFT; TOOTH ROOT;

CONNECTIVE TISSUE; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GINGIVA; GINGIVAL RECESSION; GINGIVOPLASTY; HUMANS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 24344453263     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.8.1403     Document Type: Letter

References (8)

1. Yotnuengnit P, Promsudthi A, Teparat T, Laohapand P, Yuwaprecha W. Relative connective tissue graft size affects root coverage treatment outcome in the envelope procedure. J Periodontol 2004;75:886-892.
2. Archie JP. Mathematical coupling: A common source of error. Ann Surg 1981;193:296-303.
3. Andersen B. Methodological Errors in Medical Research. London: Blackwell; 1990.
4. Pearson K. On a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organs. Proc R Soc Lond 1897;60:489-498.
5. Tu Y-K, Clerehugh V, Gilthorpe MS. Ratio variables in regression analysis can give rise to spurious results: A lesson from guided tissue regeneration. J Dent 2004;32: 143-151.
6. Allison DB, Paultre F, Goran MI, Poehlman ET, Heymsfield SB. Statistical considerations regarding the use of ratios to adjust data. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1995;19:644-652.
7. Kronmal RA. Spurious correlation and the fallacy of the ratio standard revisited. J R Stat Soc A 1993;156: 379-392.
8. Chayes F. On correlation between variables of constant sum. J Geophys Res 1960;65:4185-4193.