Ratio variables in regression analysis can give rise to spurious results: Illustration from two studies in periodontology

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 143-151

  Tu, Yu Kang ^a   Clerehugh, Valerie ^a   Gilthorpe, Mark S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Guided tissue regeneration; Mathematical coupling; Ratio variables; Root coverage

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; PERIODONTICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TISSUE REGENERATION; TOOTH ROOT;

EID: 1642512541     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2003.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Müller H.P., Eger T., Schorb A. Gingival dimensions after root coverage with free connective tissue grafts. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 25:1998;424-430.
2. Vickers A.J. The use of percentage change from baseline as an outcome in a controlled trial is statistically inefficient: a simulation study. BMC Medical Research. 1:2001;6.
3. Vickers A.J., Altman D.G. Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. British Medical Journal. 323:2001;1123-1124.
4. Pearson K. On a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 60:1897;489-498.
5. Yule G.Y. On the interpretation of correlation between indices or ratios. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 73:1910;644-647.
6. Gumbel E.J. Spurious correlation and its significance to physiology. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 21:1926;179-194.
7. Baker G.A. Correlations between functions of variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 37:1942;537-539.
8. Simon H.A. Spurious correlation: a causal interpretation. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 49:1954;467-492.
9. Kuh E., Meyer J.R. Correlation and regression estimates when the data are ratios. Econometrica. 23:1955;400-416.
10. Fuguitt G.V., Lieberson S. Correlation of ratios or difference scores having common terms. Costner H. Sociological methodology, 1973-1974. 1974;128-144 Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
11. Musselman J.R. Spurious correlation applied to urs shemata. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 18:1923;908-911.
12. Neifeld M.R. A study of spurious correlation. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 22:1927;331-338.
13. Madansky A. Spurious correlation due to deflating variables. Econometrica. 32:1964;652-655.
14. Schuessler K. Analysis of ratio variables: opportunities and pitfalls. American Journal of Sociology. 80:1974;379-396.
15. Williams G.W., Forsythe S.B., Textor S.C., Tarazi R.C. Analysis of relative change and initial value in biological studies. American Journal of Physiology. 246:1984;R122-R126.
16. Suissa S., Levinton C., Esdaile J.M. Modeling percentage change: a potential linear mirage. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 42:1989;843-848.
17. Allison D.B., Paultre F., Goran M.I., Poehlman E.T., Heymsfield S.B. Statistical considerations regarding the use of ratios to adjust data. International Journal of Obesity & Related Metabolic Disorders. 19:1995;644-652.
18. Kronmal R.A. Spurious correlation and the fallacy of the ratio standard revisited. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A. 156:1993;379-392.
19. Archie J.P. Mathematical coupling: a common source of error. Annals of Surgery. 193:1981;296-303.
20. Andersen B. Methodological errors in medical research. 1990;Blackwell, London.
21. Tu Y., Gilthorpe M.S., Griffiths G.S. Is reduction of pocket probing depth correlated with the baseline value or is it 'mathematical coupling'? Journal of Dental Research. 81:2002;722-726.
22. Danesh-Mayer M.J., Wikesjö U.M.E. Gingival recession defects and guided tissue regeneration: a review. Journal of Periodontal Research. 36:2001;341-354.
23. Silvestri M., Ricci G., Rasperini G., Sartori S., Catteneo V. Comparison of treatments of infrabony defects with enamel matrix derivative, guided tissue regeneration with a nonresorbable membrane and Widman modified flap. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 27:2000;603-610.
24. Steel R.G.D., Torrie J.H., Dickey D.A. Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach. 1997;McGraw-Hill, New York.
25. Pedhazur E.J. Multiple regression in behavioral research: explanation and prediction. 1997;Harcourt, Fort Worth.
26. Glantz S.A., Slinker B.Y. Applied regression and analysis of variance. 2001;McGraw-Hill, New York.
27. SPSS 10.0 Syntax Reference Guide. 2000;SPSS, Chicago.
28. Tu Y.-K., Griffiths G.S., Gilthorpe M.S. Mathematical coupling can undermine the statistical assessment of clinical research: illustration from the treatment of guided tissue regeneration. Journal of Dentistry. 2003.
29. Neyman J. Lectures and conferences on mathematical statistics and probability. 1952;US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.
30. Cohen J., Cohen P. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioural sciences. 1983;LEA, London.
31. Copperfield A. When in doubt, leave it to the professionals. Doctor. 2002;26.
32. Oldham P.D. A note on the analysis of repeated measurements of the same subjects. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 15:1962;969-977.