The positional power of nodes in digraphs

Social Choice and Welfare

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 439-454

  Herings, P Jean Jacques ^a   Laan, Gerard Van Der ^b   Talman, Dolf ^c  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24144496475     PISSN: 01761714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00355-003-0308-9     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Behzad M, Chartrand G, Lesniak-Foster L (1979) Graphs and digraphs. Wadsworth, Belmont, USA
2. Borm P, van den Brink R, Slikker M (2002) An iterative procedure for evaluating digraph competitions. Ann Oper Res 109: 61-75
3. Bouyssou D (1992) Ranking methods based on valued preference relations: a characterization of the net flow method. Eur J Oper Res 60: 61-67
4. van den Brink R (1994) Relational power in hierarchical organizations. Ph.D. Thesis, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
5. van den Brink R, Borm P (2002) Digraph competitions and cooperative games. Theory Decision 53: 327-342
6. van den Brink R, Gilles RP (2003) Ranking by outdegree for directed graphs. Discrete Math 271: 261-270
7. van den Brink R, Gilles RP (2000) Measuring domination in directed networks. Soc Networks 22: 141-157
8. Daniels HE (1969) Round robin tournament scores. Biometrika 56: 295-299
9. David HA (1963) The method of paired comparisons, Griffin, London, UK
10. Duggan J, Le Breton M (2001) Mixed refinements of Shapley's saddles and weak tournaments. Soc Choice Welfare 18: 65-78
11. Delver R, Monsuur H, Storcken AJA (1991) Ordering pairwise comparison structures. Theory Decision 31: 75-94
12. Dutta B, Laslier J-F (1999) Comparison functions and choice correspondences. Soc Choice Welfare 16: 513-532
13. Gilles RP, Owen G, van den Brink JR (1992) Games with permission structures: the conjunctive approach. Int J Game Theory 20: 277-293
14. Hawkins D, Simon HA (1949) Note: some conditions on macro-economic stability. Econometrica 17: 245-248
15. Henriet D (1985) The Copeland choice function: an axiomatic characterization. Soc Choice Welfare 2: 49-63
16. Herings PJJ, van der Laan G, Talman AJJ (2000) Cooperative games in graph structure, CentER Discussion paper 2000-52, CentER, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
17. Kano M, Sakamoto A (1985) Ranking the vertices of a paired comparison digraph. SIAM J Algebraic Discrete Meth 6: 79-92
18. Keener JP (1993) The Perron-Frobenius theorem and the ranking of football teams. SIAM Rev 35: 80-93
19. Kendall MG (1955) Further contributions to the theory of paired comparisons. Biometrics 11: 43-62
20. Laffond G, Laslier JF, Le Breton M (1994) The bipartisan set of a tournament game. Games Econ Behav 5: 182-201
21. Laslier JF (1997) Tournament solutions and majority voting. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
22. Moon JW, Pullman NJ (1970) On generalized tournament matrices. SIAM Rev 12: 384-399
23. Peris JE, Subiza B (1999) Condorcet choice correspondences for weak tournaments. Soc Choice Welfare 16: 217-231
24. Rubinstein A (1980) Ranking the participants in a tournament. SIAM J Appl Math 38: 108-111
25. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
26. Sen AK (1979) Collective choice and social welfare. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
27. Slutzki G, Volij O (2003) Scoring of web pages and tournaments - axiomatizations. mimeo, Iowa State University, Ames, USA
28. Vargas L, Whittaver R (eds) Decision making by the analytic hierarchy process: theory and applications. Eur J Opera Res 48: 1
29. Wei T (1952) The Algebraic foundation of ranking theory. Ph.D. Thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK