Comparison functions and choice correspondences

Social Choice and Welfare

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 513-532

  Dutta, Bhaskar ^a   Laslier, Jean Francois ^b  

^a INDIAN STATISTICAL INSTITUTE   (India)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE CERGY PONTOISE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033421408     PISSN: 01761714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s003550050158     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Aupetit B, Genest C (1993) On some useful properties of the Perron eigenvalue of a positive reciprocal matrix in the context of the analytical hierarchy process. European Journal of Operations Research 70: 263-268
2. Duggan J, Le Breton M (1996) Dutta's Minimal Covering sets and Shapley's Weak Saddles. Journal of Economic Theory 70: 257-265
3. Dutta B (1988) Covering sets and a new Condorcet choice correspondence. Journal of Economic Theory 44: 63-80
4. Fishburn PC. (1977) Condorcet Social Choice Functions. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 33: 469-489
5. Laffond G, Laslier J-F, Le Breton M (1993) The Bipartisan set of a tournament game. Games and Economic Behavior 5: 182-201
6. Laffond G, Laslier J-F., Le Breton M (1994) Social Choice Mediators. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 84: 448-453
7. Laslier J-F (1996) Aggregation of preferences with a variable set of alternatives. Mimeo, THEMA, Université de Cergy Pontoise, Cergy-Pontoise
8. Laslier J-F (1997) Tournament Solutions and Majority Voting. Studies in Economic Theory 7. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
9. McGarvey D (1953) A theorem on the construction of voting paradoxes. Econometrica 21: 608-610
10. McKelvey R (1986) Covering, Dominance and Institution-free Properties of Social Choice. American Journal of Political Science 30: 283-314
11. Miller N (1980) A new solution set for tournaments and majority voting: further graph-theoretical approaches to the theory of voting. American Journal of Political Science 24: 68-96
12. Moulin H (1986) Choosing from a tournament. Social Choice and Welfare 3: 271-291
13. Peris JE, Subiza B (1996) Condorcet choice correspondences for weak tournaments. Social Choice and Welfare 16 (in press)
14. Raghavan TES (1994), Zero-sum two-person games. In: Aumann R, Harts (eds) Handbook of Game Theory, vol. 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam
15. Saaty T (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15: 234-281