Effects of familiarity and type of encoding on proofreading of text

Reading and Writing

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 325-341

  Pilotti, Maura ^a   Chodorow, Martin ^b   Thornton, Kendell C ^a  

^a DOWLING COLLEGE   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Familiarity; Memory for text; Proofreading; Text processing

Indexed keywords

EID: 24144467513     PISSN: 09224777     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-005-4315-3     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Abramovici, S. (1983). Errors in proofreading: Evidence for syntactic control of letter processing? Memory and Cognition, 11, 258-261.
2. Bowers, J. S. & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Implicit memory and test awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 404-416.
3. Cohen, B. H. (2001). Explaining psychological statistics. New York, Wiley.
4. Daneman, M. & Stainton, M. (1993). The generation effect in reading and proofreading. Is it easier or harder to detect errors in one's own writing? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 297-313.
5. Drewnowski, A. & Healy, A. F. (1977). Detection of errors on the and and: Evidence for reading units larger than the word. Memory and Cognition, 5, 636-647.
6. Gardiner, J. M., Dawson, A. J. & Sutton, E. A. (1989). Specificity and generality of enhanced priming effects for self-generated study items. American Journal of Psychology, 102, 295-305.
7. Goolkasian, P. (1985). The role of familiarity in proofreading. The Journal of General Psychology, 112, 399-407.
8. Healy, A. F. (1976). Detection errors on the word the: Evidence for reading units longer than letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 235-242.
9. Healy, A. F. (1980). Proofreading errors on the word the: New evidence for reading units. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 45-47.
10. Kellogg, R. T. (1988). Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 355-365.
11. Kellogg, R. T. (2004). Working memory components in written sentence generation. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 341-361.
12. Kinoshita, S. (2001). The role of involuntary aware memory in implicit stem and fragment completion tasks: A selective review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 58-69.
13. Levy, B. A. (1983). Proofreading familiar text: Constraints on visual processing. Memory and Cognition, 11, 1-12.
14. Levy, B. A. & Begin, J. (1984). Proofreading familiar text: Allocating resources to perceptual and conceptual processes. Memory and Cognition, 12, 621-632.
15. Levy, B. A., Di Persio, R. & Hollingshead, A. (1992). Fluent rereading: Repetition, automaticity, and discrepancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 957-971.
16. Levy, A. B., Newell, S., Snyder, J. & Timmins, K. (1986). Processing changes across reading encounters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 467-478.
17. MacLeod, C. M. (1996). How priming affects two speeded implicit tests of remembering: Naming colors versus reading words. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 73-90.
18. MacLeod, C. M. & Masson, M. E. J. (2000). Repetition priming in speeded word reading: Contributions of perceptual and conceptual processing episodes. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 208-228.
19. McFarland, C. E., Frey, T. J. & Rhodes, D. D. (1980). Retrieval of internally versus externally generated words in episodic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 210-225.
20. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D. & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
21. Mulligan, N. W. (2002a). Positive and negative generation effects, hypermnesia, and total recall time. Memory and Cognition, 30, 1044-1053.
22. Mulligan, N. W. (2002b). Positive and negative generation effects, hypermnesia, and total recall time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 541-554.
23. Pilotti, M., Chodorow, M. & Thornton, K. C. (2004). Error detection in text: Do feedback and familiarity help? Journal of General Psychology, 131, 242-267.
24. Richardson-Klavehn, A. & Gardiner, J. M. (1998). Depth-of-processing effects on priming in stem completion: Tests of the voluntary-contamination, conceptual-processing, and lexical-processing hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 593-609.
25. Schacter, D. L., Bowers, J. & Booker, J. (1989). Intention, awareness, and implicit memory: The retrieval intentionality criterion. In S. Lewandowsky, J.C. Dunn & K. Kirsner (Eds.), Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 47-66). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Shipley, W. C. (1940). A self-administering scale for measuring intellectual impairment and deterioration. Journal of Psychology, 9, 371-377.
27. Spargo, E. & Williston, G. R. (1975). Timed readings: Level 8. Providence, RI: Jamestown Publishers.
28. Toth, J. P., Reingold, E. M. & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Toward a redefinition of implicit memory: Process Dissociations following elaborative processing and self-generation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 290-303.