Phylogeny of the Perognathus longimembris species group based on mitochondrial cytochrome-b: How many species?

Journal of Mammalogy

Volumn 86, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 826-832

  McKnight, Mark L ^a  

^a MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biogeography; Cytochrome b gene; Molecular systematics; Perognathus amplus; Perognathus inornatus; Perognathus longimembris; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; RODENT; TAXONOMY;

PEROGNATHUS AMPLUS; PEROGNATHUS INORNATUS; PEROGNATHUS LONGIMEMBRIS;

EID: 24144461708     PISSN: 00222372     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1644/1545-1542(2005)086[0826:POTPLS]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE. 1998. Guidelines for the capture, handling, and care of mammals as approved by the American Society of Mammalogists. Journal of Mammalogy 79:1416-1431.
2. BENSON, S. B. 1933. Descriptions of two races of Perognathus amplus from Arizona. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 46:109-112.
3. BEST, T. L. 1993. Patterns of morphologic and morphometric variation in heteromyid rodents. Pp. 197-235 in Biology of the Heteromyidae (H. H. Genoways and J. H. Brown, eds.). Special Publication 10, American Society of Mammalogists.
4. BRADLEY, R. D., AND R. J. BAKER. 2001. A test of the genetic species concept: cytochrome-b sequences and mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 82:960-973.
5. BROWN, J. H., AND B. A. HARNEY. 1993. Population and community ecology of heteromyid rodents in temperate habitats. Pp. 618-651 in Biology of the Heteromyidae (H. H. Genoways and J. H. Brown, eds.). Special Publication 10, American Society of Mammalogists.
6. HALL, E. R. 1946. Mammals of Nevada. University of California Press, Berkeley.
7. HALL, E. R., AND K. R. KELSON. 1959. The Mammals of North America. Vol. 1. Ronald Press Co., New York.
8. HOFFMEISTER, D. F. 1986. Mammals of Arizona. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
9. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND F. RONQUIST. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
10. KIMURA, M. 1980. A simple model for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16:111-120.
11. MADDISON, D. R., AND W. P. MADDISON. 2001. MacClade 4: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 4.03. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Publishers, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
12. MCKNIGHT, M. L. 1995. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of Perognathus amplus and Perognathus longimembris (Rodentia: Heteromyidae): a possible mammalian ring species. Evolution 49:816-826.
13. MCKNIGHT, M. L., AND M. R. LEE. 1992. Karyotypic variation in the pocket mice Perognathus amplus and P. longimembris. Journal of Mammalogy 73:625-629.
14. MISHLER, B. D., AND E. C. THERIOT. 2000. The phylogenetic species concept (sensu Mishler and Theriot): monophyly, apomorphy, and phylogenetic species concepts. Pp. 44-54 in Species concepts and phylogenetic theory, a debate (Q. D. Wheeler and R. Meier, eds.). Columbia University Press, New York.
15. PALUMBI, S. A., A. MARTINK, S. ROMANO, W. O. MCMILLAN, L. STICE, AND G. GRABOWSKI. 1991. The simple fool's guide to PCR. Version 2.0. Distributed by the authors, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
16. PATTON, J. L., AND D. S. ROGERS. 1993. Cytogenetics. Pp. 236-258 in Biology of the Heteromyidae (H.H. Genoways and J. H. Brown, eds.). Special Publication 10, American Society of Mammalogists.
17. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
18. RIDDLE, B. R. 1995. Molecular biogeography in the pocket mice (Perognathus and Chaetodipus) and grasshopper mice (Onychomys): the late Cenozoic development of a North American aridlands rodent guild. Journal of Mammalogy 76:283-301.
19. SLAYDEN, O. D. 1985. A record of the San Joaquin pocket mouse Perognathus inornatus, from Lake County, California. Southwestern Naturalist 30:466.
20. SORENSON, M. D. 1999. TreeRot, version 2. Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
21. SWEI, A., P. V. BRYLSKI, W. D. SPENCER, S. C. DODD, AND J. L. PATTON. 2003. Hierarchical genetic structure in fragmented populations of the little pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris) in southern California. Conservation Genetics 4:501-514.
22. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Publishers, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
23. THOMPSON, J. D., T. J. GIBSON, F. PLEWNIAK, F. JEANMOUGIN, AND D. G. HIGGINS. 1997. The ClustalX Windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 24:4876-4882.
24. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 1985. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; review of vertebrate wildlife; notice of review. Federal Register 50(181):37966.
25. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. 1996. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; review of plant and animal taxa that are candidates for listing as endangered or threatened species; notice of review; proposed rule. Federal Register 61(40):7596-7761.
26. WILLIAMS, D. F. 1978. Karyological affinities of the species groups of silky pocket mice (Rodentia: Heteromyidae). Journal of Mammalogy 59:599-612.
27. WILLIAMS, D. F., H. H. GENOWAYS, AND J. K. BRAUN. 1993. Taxonomy. Pp. 38-196 in Biology of the Heteromyidae (H. H. Genoways and J. H. Brown, eds.). Special Publication 10, American Society of Mammalogists.