Degradation potential and growth of anaerobic bacteria in produced water

Environmental Technology

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 915-922

  Vieira, D S ^a   Servulo E F C ^a   Cammarota, M C ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Anaerobic treatment; Oil and grease; Oilfield; Produced water; Sulphate reducing bacteria

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA; BIODEGRADATION; BIOLOGICAL WATER TREATMENT; EFFICIENCY; OFFSHORE OIL WELL PRODUCTION; OIL FIELDS; PHENOLS; PRODUCED WATER; SULFUR COMPOUNDS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ANAEROBIC BIODEGRADATION; ANAEROBIC BIOLOGICAL TREATMENTS; ANAEROBIC TREATMENTS; DEGRADATION POTENTIAL; OIL AND GREASE; OILFIELD WASTEWATERS; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES; SULPHATE REDUCING BACTERIA;

WATER POLLUTION;

HYDROGEN SULFIDE; NITROGEN; OIL; PHENOL;

ANAEROBIC PROCESS; BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; OIL INDUSTRY; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ANAEROBIC BACTERIUM; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BIODEGRADATION; BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CONTROLLED STUDY; HYDROGEN SULFIDE REMOVAL; OFFSHORE OIL INDUSTRY; SULFATE REDUCING BACTERIUM; TEMPERATURE; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER CONTAMINATION;

EID: 24144449958     PISSN: 09593330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09593332608618499     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Henderson, S.B., Grigson, S.J.W., Johnson, P. and Roddie, B.D., Potential impact of production chemicals on the toxicity of produced water discharges from North Sea oil platforms. Marine Pollut. Bull., 38, 1141-1151 (1999).
2. Tellez, G.T., Nirmalakhandan, N. and Gardea-Torresdey, J.L., Performance evaluation of an activated sludge system for removing petroleum hydrocarbons from oilfield produced water. Adv. Environ. Res., 6, 455-470 (2002).
3. Stephenson, M.T., Components of produced water: a compilation of results from several industry studies. In: Proc. of the 1st Int. Conf. on Health, Safety and Environ.. Nov. 1991, Hague, Netherlands. SPE (ed.), Netherlands, pp. 25-38 (1991).
4. Thomas J.E., Fundamentos da engenharia de petróleo, Interciência (ed.), Rio de Janeiro (2001).
5. Tellez, G.T., Nirmalakhandan, N. and Gardea-Torresdey, J.L., Performance evaluation of an activated sludge system for removing petroleum hydrocarbons from oilfield produced water. Adv. Environ. Res. 6, 455-470 (2002).
6. Strømgren, T., Sørstrom, S.E. and Schou, L., Acute toxic effects of produced water in relation to chemical composition and dispersion. Marine Environ. Res. 40, 147-169 (1995).
7. Hansen, B.R. and Davies, S.R.H., Review of potential technologies for the removal of dissolved components from produced water. Chem. Eng. Res. Design, 72, 176-188 (1994).
8. Freire, D.D.C., Tratamento aeróbio de efluentes de alta salinidade. Tese de Doutorado. COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (1999).
9. Amaral, C.L., Tratamento biológico de água de produção de petróleo microfiltrada. Dissertação de Mestrado. COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (2001).
10. Campos, J.C., Borges, R.M.H., and Filho, A.U.O, Nóbrega R. and Sant'Anna Jr., G.L., Oilfield wastewater treatment by combined microfiltration and biological process. Water Res., 36, 95-104, (2002).
11. Holliger, C. and Zehnder, A.J.B., Anaerobic biodegradation of hydrocarbons. Current Opinion in Biotechnol., 7, 326-330 (1996).
12. Widdel, F. and Rabus, R. Anaerobic biodegradation of saturated and aromatic hydrocarbons Current Opinion in Biotechnol. 12, 259-276 (2001).
13. Castro, J.F.T., Barros, E.C. and Shioya, N.H., Evolution of produced water treatment in Campos Basin. Paper SPE 46580, In: Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Health, Safety and Environ. in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production. June 1998, Caracas, Venezuela. SPE (ed.), Venezuela, pp. 1-5 (1998).
14. Postgate, J.R., The Sulphate-reducing Bacteria, 2nd ed. Cambridge, University Press, Cambridge, England (1984).
15. Oblinger, J.L. and Kolburguer, J.A., Understanding and teaching the most probable number technique. J. Milk Food Technol., 38, 540-545 (1975).
16. Hach DR/2000, Spectrophotometer Handbook (1995).
17. Jacobs, M.B., Braverman, M.M. and Hocheiser, S., Ultramicrodetermination of sulphides in air. Anal. Chem., 29, 1349-1951 (1957).
18. Freire, D.D.C. and Sant'Anna Jr., G.L., A proposed method modification for the determination of COD in saline water. Environ. Technol., 19, 1243-1247 (1998).
19. APHA, Standard Methods for Water and Wastewater Examination, 17th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C. (1992).
20. Oliveira, R.G.G. and Oliveira, M.C.K., Remoção de contaminantes tóxicos dos efluentes líquidos oriundos da atividade de produção de petróleo no mar. Bol. Tec. PETROBRAS 43, 129-136 (2000).
21. Eckenfelder, W.W. and Musterman, J.L., Activated Sludge Treatment of Industrial Wastewater, Technomic Pub. Co., Lancaster-Basel (1995).
22. Fry, B., Gest, H. and Hayes, J.M., Isotope effects associated with the anaerobic oxidation of sulfite and thiosulfate by the photosynthetic bacterium Chromatium vinosun. FEMS Microbiol. Letts., 27, 227-232 (1985).
23. Madigan, M.T., Microbiology, physiology and ecology of phototrophic bacteria. In: Biology of Anaerobic Microorganisms, Alexander J.B. Zehnder (ed.), Wiley, New York, pp.39-111 (1988).
24. Henshaw, P.F. and Zhu, W., Biological conversion of hydrogen sulphide to elemental sulphur in a fixed-film continuous flow photo-reactor. Water Res., 35, 3605-3610 (2001).
25. Speece, R.E., Anaerobic Biotechnology, Archae Press, Nashville (1996).
26. o. 20, Conselho Nacional de Meio Ambiente, Brasilia, D.F. (1986).