Effect of ambient temperature on food provisioning and reproductive success in snow buntings Plectrophenax nivalis in the high arctic

Ardea

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 239-246

  Hoset, Katrine S ^a,b   Espmark, Yngve ^a   Moksnes, Arne ^a   Haugan, Tommy ^c   Ingebrigtsen, Morten ^a   Lier, Marie ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Ambient temperature; Arctic environment; Food provisioning; Plectrophenax nivalis; Reproductive success

Indexed keywords

FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD PROVISIONING; PASSERINE; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS;

AVES; HEXAPODA; INSECTA; PASSERI; PLECTROPHENAX; PLECTROPHENAX NIVALIS;

EID: 24144446457     PISSN: 03732266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Akaike H. 1973. Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov B.N. & F. Csaki (eds) Second international symposium on Information Theory: 267-281. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.
2. Avery M.I. & J.R. Krebs 1984. Temperature and foraging success of Great Tits Parus major hunting for spiders. Ibis 126: 33-38.
3. Bangjord G., Å.Ø. Pedersen & O. Djøseland 1999. Hekkende snøspurv i fuglekasser på Svalbard. Vår Fuglefauna 22: 109-111.
4. Bryan S.M. & D.M. Bryant 1999. Heating nest-boxes reveals an energetic constraint on incubation behaviour in great tits, Parus major. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., B 266: 157-162.
5. Burnham K.P. & D.R. Anderson 2002. Model selection and interference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York.
6. Cramp S. & C.M. Perrins 1994. Buntings and New World Warblers. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
7. Dickinson J.L. & W.W. Weathers 1999. Replacement males in the Western Bluebird: opportunity for paternity, chick-feeding rules, and fitness consequences of male parental care. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 45: 201-209.
8. Drent R.H., M. Klaassen & B. Zwaan 1992. Predictive growth budgets in terns and gulls. Ardea 80: 5-17.
9. Gillott C. 1995. Entomology. Plenum Press, New York.
10. Grundel R. 1987. Determinants of nestling feeding rates and parental investment in the Mountain Chickadee. Condor 89: 319-328.
11. Hong S.B., Y.T. Woo & S. Higashi 1998. Effects of clutch size and egg-laying order on the breeding success in the Little Tern Sterna albifrons on the Nakdong Estuary, Republic of Korea. Ibis 140: 408-414.
12. Hussell D.J.T. 1972. Factors affecting clutch size in Arctic passerines. Ecol. Monogr. 42: 317-364.
13. Jarvinen A. 1993. Spatial and temporal variation in reproductive traits of adjacent Northern Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca populations. Ornis Scand. 24: 33-40.
14. Lyon B.E., R.D. Montgomerie & L.D. Hamilton 1987. Male parental care and monogamy in Snow Buntings. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20: 377-382.
15. McCarty J.P. & D.W. Winkler 1999. Relative importance of environmental variables in determining the growth of nestling tree swallows Tachycineta bicolor. Ibis 141: 286-296.
16. McKnight S.K. 1998. Effects of food abundance and environmental parameters on foraging behavior of gadwalls and American coots in winter. Can. J. Zool. 76: 1993-1998.
17. Moreno J. 1989. The breeding biology of the Wheatear Oenanthe in South Sweden during 3 contrasting years. J. Ornithol. 130: 321-334.
18. Naef-Daenzer B. & L.F. Keller 1999. The foraging performance of Great and Blue Tits (Parus major and P. caerulens) in relation to caterpillar development, and its consequences for nestling growth and fledging weight. J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 708-718.
19. Oro D., R. Pradel & J.D. Lebreton 1999. Food availability and nest predation influence life history traits in Audouin's gull, Larus audouinii. Oecologia 118: 438-445.
20. Perrins C.M. 1991. Tits and their caterpillar food-supply. Ibis 133: 49-54.
21. Rauter C.M., P.A. Brodmann & H.U. Reyer 2000. Provisioning behaviour in relation to food availability and nestling food demand in the Water Pipit Anthus spinoletta. Ardea 88: 81-90.
22. Reid J.M., P. Monaghan & G.D. Ruxton 2000. Resource allocation between reproductive phases: the importance of thermal conditions in determining the cost of incubation. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., B 267: 37-41.
23. Ringsby T.H., B.E. Saether, J. Tufto, H. Jensen & E.J. Solberg 2002. Asynchronous spatiotemporal demography of a House Sparrow metapopulation in a correlated environment. Ecology 83: 561-569.
24. Rosa S.M. & M.T. Murphy 1994. Trade-offs and constraints on Eastern Kingbird parental care. Wilson Bull. 106: 668-678.
25. Royama T. 1966. Factors governing feeding rate food requirement and brood size of nestling Great Tits Parus major. Ibis 108: 313-347.
26. Schekkerman H., M.W.J. Van Roomen & L.G. Underbill 1998. Growth, behaviour of broods and weather-related variation in breeding productivity of Curlew Sandpipers Calidris ferruginea. Ardea 86: 153-168.
27. Siikamäki P. 1996. Nestling growth and mortality of Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca in relation to weather and breeding effort. Ibis 138: 471-478.
28. Simons L.S. & T.E. Martin 1990. Food limitation of avian reproduction - an experiment with the Cactus Wren. Ecology 71: 869-876.
29. Skinner W.R., R.L. Jefferies, T.J. Carleton, R.F. Rockwell & K.F. Abraham 1998. Prediction of reproductive success and failure in Lesser Snow Geese based on early season climatic variables. Glob. Change Biol. 4: 3-16.
30. Strathdee A.T. & J.S. Bale 1998. Life on the edge: Insect ecology in arctic environments. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 43: 85-106.
31. Veistola S., E. Lehikoinen & T. Eeva 1997. Weather and breeding success at high latitudes - The Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca and the Siberian Tit Parus cinctus. Ornis Fenn. 74: 89-98.
32. Visser M.E. & C.M. Lessells 2001. The costs of egg production and incubation in great tits (Parus major). Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 268: 1271-1277.
33. Weathers W.W. 1992. Scaling nestling energy-requirements. Ibis 134: 142-153.
34. Whittingham L.A. & R.J. Robertson 1994. Food availability, parental care and male mating success in red-winged black-birds (Agelaius phoeniceus). J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 139-150.