The use of instant messaging in working relationship development: A case study

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2005, Pages

  Cho, Hee Kyung ^a,d   Trier, Matthias ^b,e   Kim, Eunhee ^c  

^a FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^c NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d Metropolitan Campus   (United States)

^e Technical University Berlin ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CASE-STUDIES; EXPLORATORY CASE STUDIES; HIERARCHICAL LEVEL; INSTANT MESSAGING; MESSAGING SYSTEM; ORGANIZATIONAL BOUNDARIES; RELATIONSHIP DEVELOPMENT; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; SOCIAL NETWORK VISUALIZATION; WORKING RELATIONSHIPS;

MESSAGE PASSING;

EID: 24144435968     PISSN: 10836101     EISSN: 10836101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00280.x     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Clark, H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Cramton, D. C. (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12 (3), 346-371.
3. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32 (5), 554-572.
4. Ducheneaut, N., & Bellotti, V. (2003). Ceci n'est pas un object? Talking about objects in email. Human-Computer Interaction, 18, 85-110.
5. Fruchterman, T. M. J., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software - Practice & Experience, 21 (11), 1129-1164.
6. Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Review, 36 (5), 921-950.
7. Gabarro, J. (1990). The development of working relationships. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work (pp. 79-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Hage, P., & Harary, F. (1983). Structural Models in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Haythornthwaite, C., Wellman, B., & Mantei, M. (1995). Work relationships and media use: A social network analysis. Group Decision and Negotiation, 4 (3), 193-211.
10. Herbsleb, J., Atkins, D., Boyer, D., & Handel, M. (2002, April). Introducing Instant Messaging and Chat in the Workplace. Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), Minneapolis, MM.
11. Huberman, B. A., & Hogg, T. (1995). Communities of practice: Performance and evolution. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 1 (1), 73-92.
12. Isaacs, E., Walendowski, A., Whittaker, S., Schiano, D. J., & Kamm, C. (2002, November). The character, functions, and styles of Instant Messaging in the workplace. Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM Press.
13. Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R. (1990). Mutual knowledge and communicative effectiveness. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work (pp. 111-146). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Kraut, R. E., Egido, C., & Galegher, J. (1990). Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work (pp. 149-171). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Lee, J., & Lee, Y. (2003, December). Cultural Implications of Electronic Communication Usage: A Theory-Based Empirical Analysis. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, Seattle, WA.
16. Moreno, J. L. (1934). Who Shall Survive?: Foundations of Sociometry, Group Psychotherapy, and Sociodrama.
17. Washington, D.C.: Nervouse and Mental Desease Publishing Co. Reprinted in 1953 (Second Edition) and in 1978 (Third Edition) by Beacon House Inc., Beacon, New York.
18. Muller, M. J., Raven, M. E., Kogan, S., Millen, D. R., & Carey, K. (2003, November). Introducing Chat into Business Organizations: Toward an Instant Messaging Maturity Model. Paper presented at Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, FL.
19. Nardi, B., Whittaker, S., & Bradner, E. (2000, December). Interaction and outeraction: Instant Messaging in action. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM Press.
20. Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in Cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46 (1), 80-97.
21. Preece, J. (2000). Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability. Chichester and New York: John Wiley & Sons.
22. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: Wiley.
23. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. W. (1986). Group process in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37 (2), 157-187.
24. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32 (11), 1492-1512.
25. Tichy, N. M., Tushman, M. L., & Fombrun, C. (1979). Social network analysis for organizations. Academy of Management Review, 4 (4), 507-519.
26. Trevino, L. K., Lengel, R. H., & Daft, R. L. (1987). Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations. Communication Research, 14 (5), 553-574.
27. Trevino, L. K., Webster, J., & Stein, E. (2000). Making connections: Complementary influences on communication media choices, attitudes, and use. Organization Science, 11 (2), 163-182.
28. Trier, M. (2005, January). IT-supported visualization of knowledge community structures. Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos: IEEE Press.
29. Voida, A., Newsletter, W., & Mynatt, E. (2002, April). When conventions collide: The tensions of Instant Messaging attributed. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 187-194). New York: ACM Press.
30. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19 (1), 52-90.
31. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
32. Wellman, B. (1997). An electric group is virtually a social network. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 179-205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., & Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 213-238.
34. Whittaker, S. (2003). Things to talk about when talking about things. Human-Computer Interaction, 18, 149-170.