Construct bias in the differential ability scales? Confirmatory and hierarchical factor structure across three ethnic groups

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 249-268

  Keith, Timothy Z ^a   Quirk, Kimberly J ^b   Schartzer, Cindy ^c   Elliott, Colin D ^d  

^a ALFRED UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Keystone Central School District   (United States)

^c Stueben County Mental Health Center

^d American Guidance Service   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24044513364     PISSN: 07342829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/073428299901700305     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Arbuckle, J. (1997). Amos user's guide version 3.6. Chicago: SmallWaters.
2. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). New-bury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Byrd, P. D., & Buckhalt, J. A. (1991). A multitrait-multimethod construct validity study of the Differential Ability Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 121-129.
4. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Elliott, C. D. (1990a). Differential Ability Scales: Introductory and technical manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
6. Elliott, C. D. (1990b). The nature and structure of children's abilities: Evidence from the Differential Ability Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 376-390.
7. Gustafsson, J.-E. (1984). A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilities. Intelligence, 8, 179-203.
8. Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Keith, T. Z. (1990). Confirmatory and hierarchical confirmatory analysis of the Differential Ability Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 391-405.
10. Keith, T. Z. (1997). Using confirmatory factor analysis to aid in understanding the constructs measured by intelligence tests. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 373-402). New York: Guilford.
11. Keith, T. Z., Fugate, M. H., DeGraff, M., Diamond, C. M., Shadrach, E. A., & Stevens, M. L. (1995). Using multi-sample confirmatory factor analysis to test for construct bias: An example using the K-ABC. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 13, 347-364.
12. Keith, T. Z., & Witta, L. (1997). Hierarchical and cross-age confirmatory factor analysis of the WISC-III: What does it measure? School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 89-107.
13. Kranzler, J. H., & Keith, T. Z. (1999). Independent confirmatory factor analysis of the Cognitive Assessment System (GAS): What does the GAS measure? School Psychology Review, 28, 117-144.
14. Marsh, H. W. (1993). The multidimensional structure of academic self-concept: Invariance over gender and age. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 841-860.
15. McArdle, J. J., & Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Human abilities in theory and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. McGhee, R. L. (1993). Fluid and crystallized intelligence: Confirmatory factor analyses of the Differential Abilities Scale, Detroit Tests of Learning Aptitude-3, and Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised. In B. A. Bracken Se R. S. McCallum (Eds.), Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. Advances in psychoeducational assessment (pp. 20-38). Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology Publishing.
17. McGrew, K. S. (1997). Analysis of the major intelligence batteries according to a proposed comprehensive Gf-Gc framework. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 151-179). New York: Guilford.
18. McGrew, K. S., & Flanagan, D. P. (1998). The intelligence test desk reference (ITDR): Gf-Gc cross-battery assessment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
19. Reynolds, C. R., Lowe, P. A., & Saenz, A. L. (1999). The problem of bias in psychological assessment. In G. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 549-595). New York: Wiley.
20. SPSS, Inc. (1997). SPSS 7.5 for Windows. Chicago: Author.
21. Stone, B. J. (1992a). Joint confirmatory factor analyses of the DAS and WISC-R. Journal of School Psychology, 30, 185-195.
22. Stone, B. J. (1992b). Joint factor analysis of the DAS and WISC-R. Diagnostique, 17, 176-184.
23. Stone, B.J. (1992c). Prediction of achievement by Asian-American and White children. Journal of School Psychology, 30, 91-99.
24. Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K. S. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10-39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.