MR-angiography of the head and neck vessels: Technical considerations and clinical indications;ARM des vaisseaux cervico-encéphaliques: Technique, principales applications cliniques

Journal de Radiologie

Volumn 86, Issue 9 II, 2005, Pages 1117-1123

  Desal, H ^a   Auffray Calvier, E ^a   Toulgoat, F ^a   Guillon, B ^a   Madoz, A ^a   De Kersaint Gilly, A ^a  

^a CHU de Nantes   (France)

Author keywords

Brain, ischemia; Brain, MR

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM;

ARTERY DISSECTION; ARTERY OCCLUSION; CEREBROVASCULAR MALFORMATION; HUMAN; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NEUROIMAGING; PARENCHYMA; REVIEW; STROKE;

EID: 24044472465     PISSN: 02210363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0221-0363(05)81503-3     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Bradley W, Waluch V, Lai K et al. Appearance of rapidly flowing blood on magnetic resonance imaging. AJR 1984;143:1167-74.
2. Agence National d'Accréditation et d'Évaluation en Santé. Angio-RM, Angio-scanner, et échographie-Doppler dans l'exploration pré-opératoire des sténoses proximales de la carotide interne cervicale. Paris: ANAES 2001.
3. Agence Nationale d'Accréditation et d'Évaluation en Santé. Imagerie de l'accident vasculaire cérébral aigu. Paris: ANAES 2002.
4. Kastler B. Comprendre l'IRM: imagerie de flux. Paris: Masson 2003.
5. Prince M. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 1994;191:155-64.
6. Maki J, Prince M, Londy F et al. The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:642-51.
7. Coley SC, Wild JM, Wilkinson ID, Griffiths PD. Neurovascular MRI with dynamic contrast-enhanced substraction angiography. Neuroradiology 2003;45:843-50.
8. Wang Y, Johnston DL, Breen JF et al. Dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using contrast enhancement, fast data acquisition, and complex subtraction. Magn Reson Imag 1996;36:551-6.
9. Hennig J, Scheffler K, Laubenberger J, Streker R. Time-resolved projection angiography after bolus injection of contrast agent. Magn Reson Med 1997; 37:341-5.
10. Aoki S, Yoshikawa T, Hori M et al. Two-dimensional thick-slice MR digital subtraction angiography for assessment of cerebrovascular occlusive diseases. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1858-64.
11. Aoki S, Yoshikawa T, Hori M et al. MR digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of cranial arteriovenous malformations and fistulas. AJR 2000;175:451-3.
12. Griffiths PD, Hoggard N, Warren DJ, Wilkinson ID, Anderson B, Romanowski CA. Brain arteriovenous malformations: assessment with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR 2000;2:1892-9.
13. Wetzel SG, Bilecen D, Lyrer P et al. Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: detection by dynamic MR projection angiography. AJR 2000;174:1293-5.
14. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial, methods, patient characteristics and progress. Stroke 1991;22:711-20.
15. Anderson CM, Lee RE, Levin DL, de la Torre Alonso S, Saloner D. Measurement of the internal stenosis from the source MR angiograms. Radiology 1994;193:219-26.
16. Auffray-Calvier E, Desal H, Viarouge MP et al. The evaluation of 3DFT time-of-flight MR angiography in the study of carotid atheromatous lesions with a review of the literature. J Neuroradiol 1995;22:272-87.
17. Johnson MB, Wilkinson ID, Wattam J, Venables GS, Griffiths PD. Comparison of Doppler ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and catheter angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis. Clin Radiol 2000;55:912-20.
18. Patel MR, Kuntz KM, Klufas et al. Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography? Stroke 1995;26:1753-8.
19. Sardanelli F, Zandrino F, Parodi RC, de Caro G. MR angiography of internal carotid arteries: breath-hold Gd-enhanced 3D fast imaging with steady-state precession versus unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:208-15.
20. Scarabino T, Carriero A, Giannatempo GM et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) in the study of the carotid stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). J Neuroradiol 1999;26:87-91.
21. Leclerc X, Gauvrit JY, Nicol L et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the cranio-cervical vessels: a review. Neuroradiology 1999;41:867-74.
22. Randoux B, Marro B, Sourour N, Koskas F, Dormont D, Marsault C. Exploration de l'origine des troncs artériels supra aortiques: l'angio-IRM avec injection de gadolinium peut-elle remplacer l'angiographie numérisée? J Neuroradiol 2001;28:176-82.
23. Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Modic MT, Ruggeri PM, Haacke EM, Selman WR. Intracranial aneurysms: evaluation by MR angiography. AJNR 1990;11:449-56.
24. Auffray E, de Kersaint-Gilly A, Havet T et al. Contribution of MR-angiography to the diagnosis and the therapeutic indication and follow-up of intracranial aneurysms. J Neuroradiol 1994;21:17-29.
25. Marks MP, Pelc NJ, Ross MR, Enzmann DR. Determination of cerebral blood flow with a phase-contrast cine MR imaging technique: evaluation of normal subjects and patients with arteriovenous malformations. Radiology 1992;182:467-76.
26. Nogushi K, Melhem ER, Kanazawa T, Kubo M, Kuwayama N, Seto H. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: evaluation with combined 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and MR digital substration angiography. AJR 2004;182:183-90.
27. Thibaut C, Garnier-Viarouge MP, de Kersaint-Gilly A, Desal H. Moyamoya disease: importance of MRI-MRA combinaison and difficulties in management and follow-up in 7 cases. J Neuroradiol 2001;28:84-91.
28. Bendszus M, Koltzenburg M, Burger R, Warmuth-Metz M, Hofmann E, Solymosi L. Silent embolism in diagnostic angiography and neurointerventional procedures: a prospective study. Lancet 1999;354:1594-97.
29. Masaryk A, Ross J, Di Cello M, Modic M, Paranandi L, Masaryk T. 3DFT MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation: potential and limitations as a screening examination. Radiology 1991;179:797-804.
30. Huston J, Lewius B, Wiebert D, Meyer D, Riederer S, Weave A. Carotid artery: prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography with conventional angiography and duplex US. Radiology 1993;186:339-344.
31. Auffray-Calvier E, de Kersaint-Gilly A, Desal H, Viarouge MP, Havet T. Peut-on opérer une sténose carotidienne sans arté riographie? JEMU 1996;17:243-5.
32. Leclerc X, Nicol E, Gauvrit JY, Ee Thuc V, Leys D, Pruvo JP. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of supraaortic vessels: the effect of voxel size on image quality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1021-7.
33. Remonda L, Heid O, Schroth G. Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography. Preliminary study. Radiology 1998;209:95-102.
34. Serfaty JM, Chirossel P, Chevalier JM, Ecochard R, Froment JC, Douek PC. Accuracy of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:455-63.
35. Pierot E. Reportage du RSNA: état de l'imagerie mondiale neuroradiologie. J Radiol 2004;85:951-4.