A randomized trial of prostaglandin E2 gel and extra-amniotic saline infusion with high dose oxytocin for cervical ripening

Medical Science Monitor

Volumn 11, Issue 8, 2005, Pages

  Sharami, Seyedeh Hajar ^a   Milani, Froozan ^a   Zahiri, Ziba ^a   Mansour Ghanaei, Fariborz ^b  

^a GUILAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b GUILAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cervical ripening; Dinoprostone; Extra amniotic saline infusion

Indexed keywords

OXYTOCIN; PROSTAGLANDIN E2; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG MEGADOSE; FEMALE; GEL; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; UTERINE CERVIX RIPENING; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADULT; AMNIOTIC FLUID; CERVICAL RIPENING; DINOPROSTONE; FEMALE; GELS; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; OXYTOCIN; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

EID: 24044470322     PISSN: 12341010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. American college of obstetricians and Gynecologists. Induction and augmentation of labor. ACOG technical bulletin no.217 Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1995
2. Vengali SR, Guinn DA, Olabi NF et al: A randomized trial of misoprostol and extra-amniotic saline infusion for cervical ripening and labor induction. Obstet Gynecol, 1998; 91(5 Pt 1): 774-79
3. Ramsey PS, Ramin KD, Ramin SM: Labor induction. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2000; 12(6): 463-73
4. Chanrachakul B, Herabutya Y: Randomized comparison of glyceryl trinitrate and prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening at term. Obstet Gynecol, 2000; 96(4): 549-53
5. Herabutya YO, Prasertsawat P, Pokpirom J: A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavourable cervix and labor induction. J Obstet Gynecol Res, 1997; 23(4): 369-74
6. Ramsey PS, Ramin KD, Ramin SM: Labor induction. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2000; 12: 463-73
7. Leszczyńska-Gorzelak B, Laskowska M, Oleszczuk J; Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 in the preinduction and induction of labor. Med Sci Monit, 2001; 7(5): 1023-28
8. Abramovici D, Goldwasser S, Mabie BC et al: A randomized comparison of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1999; 181 (5 Pt 1): 1108-12
9. Helmin J, Moller B: Extra amniotic saline infusion is promising in preparing the cervix for induction of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scan, 1998; 77(1): 45-49
10. Goldman JB, Wigton TR: A randomized comparison of extraamniotic saline infusion and intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening. Obstet Gynecol, 1999; 93(2): 271-74
11. Buccellato CA, Stika CS, Frederiksen MC: A randomized trial of misoprostol versus extra amniotic sodium chloride infusion with oxytocin for induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2000; 182(5): 1039-44
12. Guinn DA, Goepfert AR, Christine M et al: Extra-amniotic saline, Laminaria, or prostaglandin E2 gel for labor induction with unfavorable cervix: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol, 2000; 96(1): 106-12
13. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Induction of labor. ACOG practice Bulletin-Number 10.Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1999
14. Chamberlain G: ABC of labor care: induction. BMJ, 1999; 318(7189): 995-98
15. Poma PA: Cervical ripening-review and recommendations for clinical practice. J Reprod Med, 1999; 44(8): 657-68
16. Bortolus R: Determinants of response to intracervical prostaglandin for cervical ripening-Gruppo di Studio sull Induzione del Travaglio di Parto. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 1999; 87(2): 137-41
17. Ramsey PS, Owen J: Midtrimester cervical ripening and labor induction. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2000; 43(3): 495-512
18. Xenakis EMJ, Langer O, Piper JM et al: Low-dose versus high-dose oxytocin augmentation of labor: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1995; 173(6): 1874-78
19. Bartha JL, Comino-Delgado R, Garcia-Benasach F et al: Oral misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction: A randomized comparison. Obstet Gynecol, 2000; 96(3): 465-69
20. Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL: Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol, 1999; 94(4): 600-7
21. Wing DA, Paul RH: A comparison of different dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1996; 175(1): 158-64
22. Levey KA, Mackenzie AP, Stephenson C et al: Increased rates of charioamnionitis with extra-amniotic saline infusion method of labor induction. Obstet Gynecol, 2004; 103(4): 724-28