Behavioral ecology of disturbed landscapes: The response of territorial animals to relocation

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 898-905

  Burns, Catherine E ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Habitat quality; Habitat selection; Peromyscus; Territory; White footed mouse

Indexed keywords

HABITAT SELECTION; RELOCATION; TERRITORIALITY;

ANIMALIA; CRICETINAE; PEROMYSCUS; PEROMYSCUS LEUCOPUS;

EID: 23944508309     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/ari070     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Adler GH, 1985. Habitat selection and species interactions an experimental analysis with small mammal populations. Oikos 45:380-390.
2. Adler GH, Reich LM, Tamarin RH, 1984. Characteristics of white-footed mice in woodland and grassland in eastern Massachusetts. Acta Theriol 29:57-62.
3. Bowers MA, Smith HD, 1979. Differential habitat utilization by sexes of the deer mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus. Ecology 60:869-875.
4. Buchner A, Erdfelder E, Faul F, 1997. How to use G*Power. http://www.psycho.uni-duesseldorf.de/aap/projects/gpower/how_to_use_gpower.html.
5. Calsbeek R, Sinervo B, 2002. An experimental test of the ideal despotic distribution. J Anim Ecol 71:513-523.
6. Caro T, 1998. Behavioral ecology and conservation biology. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Crawley MJ, 2002. Statistical computing: an introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
8. Dewsbury DA, 1988. Kinship, familiarity, aggression and dominance in deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) in seminatural enclosures. J Comp Psychol 102:124-128.
9. Fretwell SD, Lucas HL, 1970. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor 19:16-36.
10. Gurevitch J, Morrow LL, Wallace A, Walsh JS, 1992. A meta-analysis of competition in field experiments. Am Nat 140:539-572.
11. Halama KJ, Dueser RD, 1994. Of mice and habitats: tests for density-dependent habitat selection. Oikos 69:107-114.
12. Hojesjo J, Johnsson JI, Peterson E, Jarvi T, 1998. The importance of being familiar: individual recognition and social behavior in sea trout (Salmo trutta). Behav Ecol 9:445-451.
13. Holmes RT, Marra PP, Sherry TW, 1996. Habitat-specific demography of breeding black-throated blue warblers (Dendroica caerulescens): implications for population dynamics. J Anim Ecol 65:183-195.
14. Holt RD, 1987. Population dynamics and evolutionary processes: the manifold roles of habitat selection. Evol Ecol 1:331-347.
15. Holt RD, 1996. Adaptive evolution in source-sink environments: direct and indirect effects of density-dependence on niche evolution. Oikos 75:182-192.
16. Huitu O, Norrdahl K, Korpimaki E, 2004. Competition, predation and interspecific synchrony in cyclic small mammal communities. Ecography 27:197-206.
17. Husak JF, Fox SF, 2003. Adult male collared lizards, Crotaphytus collaris, increase aggression towards displaced neighbors. Anim Behav 65:391-396.
18. Jaenike J, Holt RD, 1991. Genetic variation for habitat preference: evidence and explanations. Am Nat 137:S67-S90.
19. Kawecki TJ, 1995. Demography of source-sink populations and the evolution of ecological niches. Evol Ecol 9:38-44.
20. Korytko AI, Vessey SH, 1991. Agonistic and spacing behaviour in white footed mice, Peromyscus leucopus. Anim Behav 42:913-920.
21. Leiser JK, Itzkowitz M, 1999. The benefits of dear enemy recognition in three-contender convict cichlid (Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum) contests. Behavior 136:983-1003.
22. Lima SL, Zollner PA, 1996. Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol 11:131-135.
23. Linzey AV, 1989. Response of the white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) to the transition between disturbed and undisturbed habitats. Can J Zool 67:505-512.
24. Madison D, 1977. Movements and habitat use among interacting Peromyscus leucopus as revealed by radiotelemetry. Can Field-Nat 91:273-281.
25. Martell AM, 1983. Demography of southern red-backed voles and deer mice after logging in north-central Ontario. Can J Zool 61:958-969.
26. Massot M, Clobert J, Lecomte J, Barbault R, 1994. Incumbent advantage in common lizards and their colonizing ability. J Anim Ecol 63:432-440.
27. Metzgar LH, 1971. Behavioral population regulation in the wood mouse Peromyscus leucopus. Am Midl Nat 86:434-448.
28. Mitchell WA, Abramsky Z, Kotler BP, Pinshow B, Brown JS, 1990. The effect of competition on foraging activity in desert rodents: theory and experiments. Ecology 71:844-854.
29. Moller AP, 1991. Clutch size, nest predation, and distribution of avian unequal competitors in a patchy environment. Ecology 72:1336-1349.
30. Morris DW, 1989. Density-dependent habitat selection: testing the theory with fitness data. Evol Ecol 3:80-94.
31. Morris DW, 1991. Fitness and patch selection by white-footed mice. Am Nat 138:702-716.
32. Nupp TE, Swihart RK, 2000. Landscape-level correlates of small-mammal assemblages in forest fragments of farmland. J Mammal 81:512-526.
33. Nupp TE, Swihart RK, 2001. Assessing competition between forest rodents in a fragmented landscape of midwestern USA. Mammal Biol 66:345-356.
34. Osenberg CW, St. Mary CM, Schmitt RJ, Holbrook SJ, Chesson P, Byrne B, 2002. Rethinking ecological inference: density dependence in reef fishes. Ecol Lett 5:715-721.
35. Ostfeld RS, Canham CD, Pugh SR, 1993. Intrinsic density-dependent regulation of vole populations. Nature 366:259-261.
36. Petit JL, Petit DR, 1996. Factors governing habitat selection by prothonotary warblers: field tests of the Fretwell-Lucas models. Ecol Monogr 66:367-387.
37. Pulliam HR, 1988. Sources, sinks and population regulation. Am Nat 132:652-661.
38. Pulliam HR, Danielson BJ, 1991. Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am Nat 137:S50-S66.
39. Randall JA, Hekkala ER, Cooper LD, Barfield J, 2002. Familiarity and flexible mating strategies of a solitary rodent, Dipodomys ingens. Anim Behav 64:11-21.
40. Rowley MH, Christian JJ, 1976. Intraspecific aggression of Peromyscus leucopus. Behav Biol 17:249-253.
41. Schnurr JL, Ostfeld RS, Canham CD, 2002. Direct and indirect effects of masting on rodent populations and tree seed survival. Oikos 96:402-410.
42. Schradin C, 2004. Territorial defense in a group-living solitary forager: who, where, against whom? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:439-446.
43. S-Plus, 1998. S-Plus software, version 4.5. Seattle: Math Soft, Inc.
44. SPSS, 2002. SPSS software, version 11.0. Chicago: Mac OSX.
45. Sullivan TP, 1979. Demography of populations of deer mice in coastal forest and clear-cut (logged) habitats. Can J Zool 57:1636-1648.
46. Trigosso-Venario R, Labra A, Niemeyer HM, 2002. Interactions between males of the lizard Liolaemus tenuis: roles of familiarity and memory. Ethology 108:1057-1064.
47. Utne-Palm AC, Hart PJB, 2000. The effects of familiarity on competitive interactions between threespined sticklebacks. Oikos 91:225-232.
48. Wauters LA, Gurnell J, Preatoni D, Tosi G, 2001. Effects of spatial variation in food availability on spacing behaviour and demography of Eurasian red squirrels. Ecography 24:525-538.
49. Wolff JO, 1985. The effects of density, food, and interspecific interference on home range size in Peromyscus leucopus and Peromyscus maniculatus. Can J Zool 63:2657-2662.
50. Wolff JO, Dueser RD, 1986. Noncompetitive coexistence between Peromyscus-sp and Clethrionomys gapperi. Can Field-Nat 100:186-191.