Adult male collared lizards, Crotaphytus collaris, increase aggression towards displaced neighbours

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 391-396

  Husak, Jerry F ^a   Fox, Stanley F ^a  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; LIZARD; RECOGNITION; TERRITORIALITY;

ARENA; CROTAPHYTUS; CROTAPHYTUS COLLARIS; SQUAMATA;

EID: 0037327626     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2058     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baird, T. A., Acree, M. A. & Sloan, C. L. 1996. Age and gender-related differences in the social behavior and mating success of free-living collared lizards, Crotaphytus collaris. Copeia, 1996, 336-347.
2. Baird, T. A., Fox, S. F. & McCoy, J. K. 1997. Population differences in the roles of size and coloration in intra- and inter-sexual selection in the collared lizard, Crotaphytus collaris: influence of habitat and social organization. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 506-517.
3. Baird, T. A., Sloan, C. L. & Timanus, D. K. 2001. Intra- and inter-seasonal variation in the socio-spatial behavior of adult male collared lizards, Crotaphytus collaris (Reptilia, Crotaphytidae). Ethology, 107, 15-32.
4. Bradbury, J. W. & Vehrencamp, S. L. 1998. Principles of Animal Communication. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
5. Conover, W. J. 1999. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. New York: J. Wiley.
6. Dodd, C. K. 1993. The effects of toe-clipping on sprint performance of the lizard Cnemidophorus sexlineatus. Journal of Herpetology, 27, 209-213.
7. Falls, J. B. 1978. Bird song and territorial behavior. In: Aggression, Dominance, and Individual Spacing (Ed. by L. Kramer, P. Pliner & T. Alloway), pp. 61-89. New York: Plenum.
8. Falls, J. B. & Brooks, R. J. 1975. Individual recognition by song in white-throated sparrows. II. Effects of location. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 53, 1412-1420.
9. Fisher, J. 1954. Evolution and bird sociality. In: Evolution as a Process (Ed. by J. Huxley, A. C. Hardy & E. B. Ford), pp. 71-83. London: Allen & Unwin.
10. Fisher, M. & Muth, A. 1989. A technique for permanently marking lizards. Herpetological Review, 20, 45-46.
11. Fitch, H. S. 1956. An ecological study of the collared lizard (Crotaphytus collaris). University of Kansas Publications of the Museum of Natural History, 8, 213-274.
12. Fox, S. F. & Baird, T. A. 1992. The dear enemy phenomenon in the collared lizard, Crotaphytus collaris, with a cautionary note on experimental methodology. Animal Behaviour, 44, 780-782.
13. Fox, S. F. & Rostker, M. A. 1982. Social cost of tail loss in Uta stansburiana. Science, 218, 692-693.
14. Glinski, T. H. & Krekorian, C. O. 1985. Individual recognition in free-living adult male desert iguanas, Dipsosaurus dorsalis. Journal of Herpetology, 19, 541-544.
15. Jaeger, R. G. 1981. Dear enemy recognition and the costs of aggression between salamanders. American Naturalist, 117, 962-974.
16. López, P. & Martín, J. 2001. Fighting rules and rival recognition reduce costs of aggression in male lizards, Podarcis hispanica. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 49, 111-116.
17. McGregor, P. K. & Westby, G. W. M. 1992. Discrimination of individually characteristic electric organ discharges by a weakly electric fish. Animal Behaviour, 43, 977-986.
18. Maynard Smith, J. & Parker, G. A. 1976. The logic of asymmetric contests. Animal Behaviour, 24, 159-175.
19. Myrberg, A. A. & Riggio, R. J. 1985. Acoustically mediated individual recognition by a coral reef fish (Pomacentrus partitus). Animal Behaviour, 33, 411-416.
20. Olsson, M. 1994. Rival recognition affects male contest behavior in sand lizards (Lacerta agilis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 35, 249-252.
21. Parker, G. A. & Rubenstein, D. I. 1981. Role assessment, reserve strategy, and acquisition of information in asymmetric animal contests. Animal Behaviour, 29, 221-240.
22. Paulissen, M. A. & Meyer, H. A. 2000. The effect of toe-clipping on the gecko Hemidactylus turcicus. Journal of Herpetology, 34, 282-285.
23. Qualls, C. P. & Jaeger, R. G. 1991. Dear enemy recognition in Anolis carolinensis. Journal of Herpetology, 25, 361-363.
24. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution, 43, 223-225.
25. Rose, B. 1982. Lizard home ranges: methodology and functions. Journal of Herpetology, 16, 253-269.
26. SPSS. 1998. SYSTAT. Version 9. Evanston, Illinois: SPSS.
27. Stamps, J. A. & Krishnan, V. V. 1994. Territory acquisition in lizards: II. Establishing social and spatial relationships. Animal Behaviour, 47, 1387-1400.
28. Temeles, E. J. 1994. The role of neighbours in territorial systems: when are they 'dear enemies'? Animal Behaviour, 47, 339-350.
29. Trivers, R. 1985. Social Evolution. Menlo Park, California: Benjamin/Cummings.
30. Uzee, E. M. 1990. The effects of thermal constraints on the daily activity of Crotaphytus collaris. M.S. thesis, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater.
31. Whiting, M. J. 1999. When to be neighborly: differential agonistic responses in the lizard Platysaurus broadleyi. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46, 210-214.
32. Wiley, R. H. & Wiley, M. S. 1977. Recognition of neighbors' duets by stripe-backed wrens Campylorhynchus nuchalis. Behaviour, 62, 10-34.
33. Ydenberg, R. C., Giraldeau, L. A. & Falls, J. B. 1988. Neighbours, strangers, and the asymmetric war of attrition. Animal Behaviour, 36, 343-347.