Evolutionary optimization of music performance annotation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Volumn 3310, Issue , 2005, Pages 347-358

  Grachten, Maarten ^a   Arcos, Josep Lluís ^a   López De Mántaras, Ramon ^a  

^a CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER MUSIC; ERROR ANALYSIS;

EVOLUTIONARY OPTIMIZATION; MUSIC PERFORMANCE ANNOTATION; NOTE ORNAMENTATION; TEST-SET;

OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 23944492876     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-31807-1_25     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. J. Ll. Arcos, M. Grachten, and R. López de Mántaras. Extracting performer's behaviors to annotate cases in a CBR system for musical tempo transformations. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR-03), 2003.
2. Sergio Canazza, Giovanni De Poli, Stefano Rinaldin, and Alvise Vidolin. Sono-logical analysis of clarinet expressivity. In Marc Leman, editor, Music, Gestalt, and Computing: studies in cognitive and systematic musicology, number 1317 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 431-440. Springer, 1997.
3. R. Dannenberg. An on-line algorithm for real-time accompaniment. In Proceedings of the 1984 International Computer Music Conference. International Computer Music Association, 1984.
4. P. Desain and H. Honing. Does expressive timing in music performance scale proportionally with tempo? Psychological Research, 56:285-292, 1994.
5. E. Gómez, M. Grachten, X. Amatriain, and J. Ll. Arcos. Melodic characterization of monophonic recordings for expressive tempo transformations. In Proceedings of Stockholm Music Acoustics Conference 2003, 2003.
6. E. W. Large. Dynamic programming for the analysis of serial behaviors. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 25(2):238-241, 1993.
7. V. I. Levenshtein. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10:707-710, 1966.
8. M. Mongeau and D. Sankoff. Comparison of musical sequences. Computers and the Humanities, 24:161-175, 1990.
9. B. Pardo and W. Birmingham. Improved score following for acoustic performances. In International Computer Music Conference (ICMC), Goteborg, Sweden, 2002. The International Computer Music Association.
10. M. Puckette and A. C. Lippe. Score following in practice. In Proceedings, International Computer Music Conference, pages 182-185, San Francisco, 1992. International Computer Music Association.
11. B. H. Repp. Quantitative effects of global tempo on expressive timing in music performance: Some perceptual evidence. Music Perception, 13(1):39-58, 1995.
12. Ll. A. Smith, R. J. McNab, and I. H. Witten. Sequence-based melodic comparison: A dynamic programming approach. In W. B. Hewlett and E. Selfridge-Field, editors, Melodic Similarity. Concepts, Procedures, and Applications, Computing in Musicology, pages 101-118. MIT Press, 1998.
13. G. Widmer. Large-scale induction of expressive performance rules: First quantitative results. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC2000), San Francisco, CA, 2000. International Computer Music Association.