Developmental anatomy of the root cortex of the basal monocotyledon, Acorus calamus (Acorales, Acoraceae)

Annals of Botany

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 379-385

  Soukup, Aleš ^a   Seago Jr , James L ^b   Votrubová, Olga ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT OSWEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Acorus; Anatomy; Apical meristem; Cortex; Phylogeny; Root; Stele

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY;

ACORUS; ARTICLE; CYTOLOGY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; PLANT EPIDERMIS; PLANT ROOT;

ACORUS; PLANT EPIDERMIS; PLANT ROOTS;

ACORACEAE; ACORALES; ACORUS; ACORUS CALAMUS; LILIOPSIDA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; NYMPHAEACEAE; NYMPHAEALES;

EID: 23944480655     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mci190     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 531-553.
2. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399-436.
3. Brundrett MC, Enstone DE, Peterson CA. 1988. A berberine-aniline blue fluorescent staining procedure for suberin, lignin, and callose in plant tissue. Protoplasma 1446: 133-142.
4. Brundrett MC, Kendrick B, Peterson CA. 1987. Efficient lipid staining in plant material with sudan red 7B or fluorol yellow 088 in polyethylene glycol. Biotechnic & Histochemistry 66: 133-142.
5. Carlquist S, Schneider EL. 1997. Origins and nature of vessels in monocotyledons. I. Acorus. International Journal of Plant Sciences 158: 51-56.
6. Clarkson DT, Robards K. 1975. The endodermis, its structural development and physiological role. In: Torrey JG, Clarkson DT, eds. Structure and function of roots. London: Academic Press, 415-436.
7. Clowes FAL. 1981. The difference between open and closed meristems. Annals of Botany 48: 761-767.
8. Clowes FAL. 2000. Pattern in root meristem development in angiosperms. New Phytologist 146: 83-94.
9. Conard HS. 1905. The waterlilies: a monograph of the genus Nymphaea. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
10. Duvall MR. 2001. An anatomical study of anther development in Acorus L.: phylogenetic implications. Plant Systematics and Evolution 228: 143-152.
11. Eames AJ. 1961. Morphology of the angiosperms. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
12. Fleet van DS. 1961. Histochemistry and function of the endodermis. Botanical Review 27: 165-220.
13. Floyd SK, Friedman WE. 2001. Evolution of endosperm developmental patterns among basal flowering plants. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: S57-S81.
14. Friis EM, Pedersen KR, Crane PR. 2001. Fossil evidence of water lilies (Nymphaeales) in the early cretaceous. Nature 410: 357-360.
15. Groot EP, Doyle JA, Nichol SA, Rost TL. 2004. Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of root apical meristem organization in dicotyledonous angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 165: 97-105.
16. Guttenberg von H. 1968. Der primäre Bau der Angiospermenwurzel. In: Linsbauer K, Tischler G, Pascher A, eds. Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie, Vol. VIII. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger, 1-472.
17. Haas DL, Carothers ZB. 1975. Some ultrastructural observations on endodermal cell development in Zea mays roots. American Journal of Botany 62: 336-348.
18. Haupt AW. 1953. Plant morphology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
19. Holle HG. 1876. Über den Vegetationspunkt der Angiospermen Wurzeln, insbesondere die Haubenbildung. Botanische Zeitung 34: 241-255, 257-264.
20. Janczewski E de. 1874. Recherches sur l'accroissement terminal des racines dans les Phanerogames. Annales des Sciences Naturelles Series 20: 162-201.
21. Jensen WA. 1962. Botanical histochemistry. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman and Co.
22. Justin SHFW, Armstrong W. 1987. The anatomical characteristics of roots and plant response to soil flooding. New Phytologist 106: 465-405.
23. Keating RC. 2003. The anatomy of the monocotyledons. Vol. IX. The Acoraceae and Araceae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Kroemer K. 1903. Wurzelhaut Hypodermis und Endodermis der Angiospermwurzel. Bibliotheca Botanica 59: 1-151.
25. Kroll GH. 1912. Kritische Studie über die Verwertbarkeit der Wurzelhaubentypen für Entwicklungsgeschicte. Beiheft zum Botanisches Zentralblatt 28: 134-158.
26. Laan P, Berrovoets MJ, Lythe S, Armstrong W, Blom CWPM. 1989. Root morphology and aerenchyma formation as indicators of the flood-tolerance of Rumex species. Journal of Ecology 77: 693-703.
27. Maillefer A. 1921. Sur la presence d'une assise dans la racine d'Acorus calamus. Bulletin de la Societie vaudoise des sciences naturelles 53: 77-79.
28. Němec B. 1907. Anatomie a fyziologie rostlin. Prague, Czech Republic: Nakladatelství České Akademie Císaře Františka Josefa pro Vědy, Slovesnost a Umění.
29. Schneider EL, Carlquist S, Beamer K, Kohn A. 1995. Vessels in Nymphaeaceae: Nuphar, Nymphaea, and Ondinea. International Journal of Plant Sciences 156: 857-862.
30. Seago Jr JL. 2002. The root cortex of the Nymphaeaceae, Cabombaceae, and Nelumbonaceae. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 129: 1-9.
31. Seago Jr JL, Peterson CA, Kinsley LJ, Broderick J. 2000. Development and structure of the root cortex in Caltha palustris L. and Nymphaea cordata Ait. Annals of Botany 86: 631-640.
32. Shishkoff N. 1987. Distribution of the dimorphic hypodermis of roots in Angiosperm families. Annals of Botany 60: 1-15.
33. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Bennet MD, Leitch IJ. 2003. Evolution of genome size in the angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 90: 1596-1603.
34. Soukup A, Votrubova O, Cizkova H. 2002. Development of anatomical structure of roots of Phragmites australis. New Phytologist 153: 277-287.
35. Sun G, Ji Q, Dilcher DL, Zheng S, Nixon KC, Wang X. 2002. Archaefructaceae, a new Basal Angiosperm family. Science 296: 899-904.