Salt tolerance in wild Hordeum species is associated with restricted entry of Na+ and Cl- into the shoots

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 56, Issue 419, 2005, Pages 2365-2378

  Garthwaite, Alaina J ^a   Von Bothmer, Roland ^b   Colmer, Timothy D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Asparagine; Barley (Hordeum vulgare); Cl ; Glycinebetaine; K +; Na+; Osmotic potential; Proline; Salt tolerance; Triticeae; Wild relatives

Indexed keywords

NUTRITION; SODIUM CHLORIDE; TISSUE; WATER;

H. SECALINUM; JUBATUM;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

CHLORIDE; SODIUM; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ARTICLE; BARLEY; CLASSIFICATION; DRUG EFFECT; KINETICS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT LEAF; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

CHLORIDES; HORDEUM; KINETICS; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT SHOOTS; SODIUM; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

HORDEUM; HORDEUM BOGDANII; HORDEUM INTERCEDENS; HORDEUM JUBATUM; HORDEUM LECHLERI; HORDEUM MARINUM; HORDEUM MURINUM; HORDEUM PATAGONICUM; HORDEUM SECALINUM; HORDEUM VULGARE; HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE; TRITICEAE;

EID: 23944469669     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eri229     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Colmer TD, Epstein E, Dvorak J. 1995. Differential solute regulation in leaf blades of various ages in salt-sensitive wheat and a salt-tolerant wheatxLophopyrum elongatum (Host) A. Löve amphiploid. Plant Physiology 108, 1715-1724.
2. Drake BG, Gallagher JL. 1984. Osmotic potential and turgor maintenance in Spartina alterniflora Loisel. Oecologia 62, 368-375.
3. Dvorák J, Noaman MM, Goyal S, Gorham J. 1994. Enhancement of the salt tolerance of Triticum turgidum L. by the Kna1 locus transferred from the Triticum aestivum L. chromosome 4D by homoeologous recombination. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 87, 872-877.
4. 1H NMR and GC: analysis for organic osmolytes in crude tissue extracts. Analytical Biochemistry 214, 260-271.
5. Forster BP, Pakniyat H, Macaulay M, Matheson W, Phillips MS, Thomas WTB, Powell W. 1994. Variation in the leaf sodium content of the Hordeum vulgare (barley) cultivar Maythorpe and its derived mutant cv. Golden Promise. Heredity 73, 249-253.
6. Garthwaite AJ, von Bothmer R, Colmer TD. 2003. Diversity in root aeration traits associated with waterlogging tolerance in the genus Hordeum. Functional Plant Biology 30, 875-889.
7. Glenn EP. 1987. Relationship between cation accumulation and water content of salt-tolerant grasses and a sedge. Plant, Cell and Environment 10, 205-212.
8. Glenn EP, O'Leary JW. 1984. Relationship between salt accumulation and water content of dicotyledonous halophytes. Plant, Cell and Environment 7, 253-261.
9. Gorham J. 1993. Genetics and physiology of enhanced K/Na discrimination. In: Randall PJ, ed. The fourth international symposium on genetic aspects of plant mineral nutrition. Canberra, Australia: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 151-158.
10. + discrimination in wheat. New Phytologist 137, 109-116.
11. Gorham J, Bristol A, Young EM, Wyn Jones RG, Kashour G. 1990a. Salt tolerance in the Triticeae: K/Na discrimination in barley. Journal of Experimental Botany 41, 1095-1101.
12. Gorham J, Forster BP, Budrewicz E, Wyn Jones RG, Miller TE, Law CN. 1986. Salt tolerance in the Triticeae: solute accumulation and distribution in an amphiploid derived from Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring and Thinopyrum bessarabicum. Journal of Experimental Botany 37, 1435-1449.
13. Gorham J, McDonnell E, Budrewicz E, Wyn Jones RG. 1985. Salt tolerance in the Triticeae: growth and solute accumulation in leaves of Thinopyrum bessarabicum. Journal of Experimental Botany 36, 1021-1031.
14. + discrimination in the D genome of wheat. Planta 180, 590-597.
15. Greenway H. 1962. Plant response to saline substrates. I. Growth and ion uptake of several varieties of Hordeum during and after sodium chloride treatment. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 15, 16-38.
16. Greenway H. 1965. Plant responses to saline substrates. IV. Chloride uptake by Hordeum vulgare as affected by inhibitors, transpiration, and nutrients in the medium. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 18, 249-268.
17. Greenway H, Munns R. 1980. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 31, 149-190.
18. Greenway H, Rogers A. 1963. Growth and ion uptake of Agropyron elongatum on saline substrates, as compared with a salt-tolerant variety of Hordeum vulgare. Plant and Soil 18, 21-30.
19. Howes Keiffer C, Ungar IA. 1997a. The effect of extended exposure to hypersaline conditions on the germination of five inland halophyte species. American Journal of Botany 84, 104-111.
20. Howes Keiffer C, Ungar IA. 1997b. The effects of density and salinity on shoot biomass and ion accumulation in five inland halophytic species. Canadian Journal of Botany 75, 96-107.
21. Huang J, Redmann RE. 1995. Solute adjustment to salinity and calcium supply in cultivated and wild barley. Journal of Plant Nutrition 18, 1371-1389.
22. Husain S, von Caemmerer S, Munns R. 2004. Control of salt transport from roots to shoots of wheat in saline soil. Functional Plant Biology 31, 1115-1126.
23. Jacobsen N, von Bothmer R. 1992. Supraspecific groups in the genus Hordeum. Heriditas 116, 21-24.
24. Mano Y, Takeda K. 1998. Genetic resources of salt tolerance in wild Hordeum species. Euphytica 103, 137-141.
25. Munns R. 1993. Physiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soils: some dogmas and hypotheses. Plant, Cell and Environment 16, 15-24.
26. Munns R. 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell and Environment 25, 239-250.
27. Munns R, Hare RA, James RA, Rebetzke GJ. 2000. Genetic variation for improving the salt tolerance of durum wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 69-74.
28. Munns R, Husain S, Rivelli AR, James RA, Condon AG, Lindsay MP, Lagudah ES, Schachtman DP, Hare RA. 2002. Avenues for increasing salt tolerance of crops, and the role of physiologically based selection traits. Plant and Soil 247, 93-105.
29. Munns R, Schachtman DP, Condon AG. 1995. The significance of a two-phase growth response to salinity in wheat and barley. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 22, 561-569.
30. Munns R, Termaat A. 1986. Whole-plant responses to salinity. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 13, 143-160.
31. Naidu BP. 1998. Separation of sugars, polyols, proline analogues, and betaines in stressed plant extracts by high performance liquid chromatography and quantification by ultra detection. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 25, 793-800.
32. Nevo E, Krugman T, Beiles A. 1993. Short communication: genetic resources for salt tolerance in the wild progenitors of wheat (Triticum dicoccoides) and barley (Hordeum spontaneum) in Israel. Plant Breeding 110, 338-341.
33. Pavlik BM. 1984. Seasonal changes of osmotic pressure symplasmic water content and tissue elasticity in the blades of dune grasses growing in situ along the coast of Oregon, USA. Plant, Cell and Environment 7, 531-540.
34. Rawson HM, Richards RA, Munns R. 1988. An examination of selection criteria for salt tolerance in wheat, barley and triticale genotypes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 39, 759-772.
35. Richards RA, Dennett CW, Qualset CO, Epstein E, Norlyn JD, Winslow MD. 1987. Variation in yield of grain and biomass in wheat, barley and triticale in a salt-affected field. Field Crops Research 15, 277-287.
36. Rivelli AR, James RA, Munns R, Condon AG. 2002. Effect of salinity on water relations and growth of wheat genotypes with contrasting sodium uptake. Functional Plant Biology 29, 1065-1074.
37. Shah SH, Gorham J, Forster BP, Wyn Jones RG. 1987. Salt tolerance in the Triticeae: the contribution of the D genome to cation selectivity in hexaploid wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 38, 254-269.
38. Storey R, Wyn Jones RG. 1978a. Salt stress and comparative physiology in the Gramineae. I. Ion relations of two salt- and water-stressed barley cultivars, California Mariout and Arimar. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 5, 801-816.
39. Storey R, Wyn Jones RG. 1978b. Salt stress and comparative physiology in the Gramineae. III. Effect of salinity upon ion relations and glycine betaine and proline levels in Spartinaxtownsendii. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 5, 831-838.
40. Suhayda CG, Redmann RE, Harvey BL, Cipywnyk AL. 1992. Comparative response of cultivated and wild barley species to salinity stress and calcium supply. Crop Science 32, 154-163.
41. Svitashev S, Bryngelsson T, Vershinin A, Pedersen C, Säll T, von Bothmer R. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Hordeum using repetitive DNA sequences. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89, 801-810.
42. Taketa S, Ando H, Takeda K, von Bothmer R. 1999. Brief report: detection of Hordeum marinum genome in three polyploid Hordeum species and cytotypes by genomic in situ hybridization. Heriditas 130, 185-188.
43. + transport in higher plants. Annals of Botany 91, 503-527.
44. Venus JC, Causton DR. 1979. Plant growth analysis: a reexamination of the methods of calculation of relative growth rate and net assimilation rates without using fitted functions. Annals of Botany 43, 633-638.
45. von Bothmer R, Giles BE, Jacobsen N. 1986. Crosses and genome relationships in the Hordeum patagonicum group. Genetica 71, 75-80.
46. von Bothmer R, Jacobsen N, Baden C, Jørgensen RB, Linde-Laursen I. 1995. An ecogeographical study of the genus Hordeum, 2nd edn. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.
47. White PJ, Broadley MR. 2001. Chloride in soils and its uptake and movement within the plant: a review. Annals of Botany 88, 967-988.