Pulpal response to a hybrid composite resin inlay bonded with a newly developed resin-modified glass ionomer luting cement

Dental Materials Journal

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 178-186

  Uzzaman, Md Akhtar ^a   Shimada, Yasushi ^a   Seki, Yuichi ^a   Tagami, Junji ^a  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Hybrid composite resin; Pulpal response; Resin modified glass ionomer luting cement

Indexed keywords

EID: 23944438361     PISSN: 02874547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.24.178     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Suese K, Kawazoe T. Wear resistance of hybrid composite resin for crown material by the two-body sliding test. Dent Mater J 2002; 21(3): 225-237.
2. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982; 16(3): 265-273.
3. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 1994; 73(6): 1212-1220.
4. Yamauti M, Nikaido T, Ikeda M, Otsuki M, Tagami J. Microhardness and Young's modulus of a bonding resin cured with different curing units. Dent Mater J 2004; 23(4): 457-466.
5. Kanno T, Ogata M, Foxton RM, Nakajima M, Tagami J, Miura H. Microtensile bond strength of dual-cure resin cement to root canal dentin with different curing strategies. Dent Mater J 2004; 23(4): 550-556.
6. Okamoto M, Mine A, Watanabe K, Kawahara D, Yatani H. Porcelain veneer bonding to dentin and the curing performance of plasma-arc light with respect to porcelain thickness. Dent Mater J 2003; 22(3): 313-320.
7. Ferdianakis K. Microleakage reduction from newer esthetic restorative materials in permanent molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998; 22(3): 221-229.
8. Chuang SF, Liu JK, Chao CC, Liao FP, Chen YH. Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85(2): 177-183.
9. Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. The effect of flexural load cycling on the microleakage of cervical resin composites. Oper Dent 2001; 26(5): 451-459.
10. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PNR, Nikaido T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays. Oper Dent 2003; 28(1): 28-35.
11. Antonucci JM, McKinney JE, Stansbury JW. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement, US Patent Application, 1988, 160856.
12. Mount GJ. Glass-ionomer cements: Past, present, and future. Oper Dent 1994; 19(3): 82-90.
13. Kadoma Y. Chemical structures of adhesion promoting monomers for precious metals and their bond strengths to dental metals. Dent Mater J 2003; 22(3): 343-358.
14. Tobias RS, Browne RM, Plant CG, Ingram DV. Pulpal response to a glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J 1978; 144(11): 345-350.
15. Hosoda H, Inokoshi S, Shimada Y, Harnirattisai C, Otsuki M. Pulpal response to a new light-cured composite placed in etched glass-ionomer lined cavities. Oper Dent 1991; 16(4): 122-129.
16. Shimada Y. Pulpal response to various dentin conditioning agents. Jpn J Conserv Dent 1992; 35(1): 69-100.
17. Wahl MJ. Amalgam - Resurrection and redemption. Part 1: The clinical and legal mythology of anti-amalgam. Quintessence Int 2001; 32(7): 525-535.
18. Murray PE, Hafez AA, Smith AJ, Cox CF. Bacterial microleakage and pulp inflammation associated with various restorative materials. Dent Mater 2002; 18(6): 470-478.
19. Kitasako Y, Nakajima M, Pereira PNR, Okuda M, Sonoda H, Otsuki M, Tagami J. Monkey pulpal response and microtensile bond strength beneath a one-application resin bonding system in vivo. J Dent 2000; 28(3): 193-198.
20. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 7405, Dentistry: Preclinical evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry, Test methods for dental materials, Geneva: ISO, 1997.
21. Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, Ostro E, Bergenholtz G. Biocompatibility of surface-sealed dental materials against exposed dental pulps. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57(1): 1-8.
22. Smith DC, Ruse ND. Acidity of glass ionomer cements during setting and its relation to pulp sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 1986; 112(5): 654-657.
23. Wilson AD, McLean JW. Glass-ionomer cements, Quintessence Publishing Co., Chicago, 1988, pp.125-130.
24. Wasson EA, Nicholson JW. Change in pH during setting of polyelectrolyte dental cements. J Dent 1993; 21(2): 122-126.
25. Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Mechanical and physical properties of contemporary dental luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89(2): 127-134.
26. McComb D, Nathanson D. Glass-ionomer luting cements, In: Advances in glass-ionomer cements, Davidson CL, Mjör IA eds, Quintessence Publishing Co., Chicago, 1999, pp.149-170.
27. Boston DW, Graver HT. Histobacteriological analysis of acid red dye-stainable dentin found beneath intact amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1994; 19(2): 65-69.
28. Yap AU, Tan S, Teh TY. The effect of polishing systems on microleakage of tooth coloured restoratives. Part 1: Conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27(2): 117-123.
29. Martin FE, O'Rourke M. Marginal seal of cervical tooth-colored restorations: A laboratory investigation of placement techniques. Aust Dent J 1993; 38(2): 102-107.
30. Tjandrawinata R, Irie M, Suzuki K. Marginal gap formation and fluoride release of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement: Effect of silanized spherical filler addition. Dent Mater J 2004; 23(3): 305-313.
31. Tjandrawinata R, Irie M, Yoshida Y, Suzuki K. Effect of adding spherical silica filler on physico-mechanical properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. Dent Mater J 2004; 23(2): 146-154.
32. Meiers JC, Miller GA. Antibacterial activity of dentin bonding systems, resin-modified glass ionomers, and polyacid-modified composite resins. Oper Dent 1996; 21(6): 257-264.
33. DeSchepper EJ, Thrasher MR, Thurmond BA. Antibacterial effects of light-cured liners. Am J Dent 1989; 2(3): 74-76.
34. Thoneman B, Federlin M, Schmalz G, Hiller KA. Resin-modified glass ionomers for luting posterior ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 1995; 11(3): 161-168.
35. Coogan MM, Creaven PJ. Antibacterial properties of eight dental cements. Int Endod J 1993; 26(6): 355-361.
36. Han L, Edward C, Okamoto A, Iwaku M. A comparative study of fluoride-releasing adhesive resin materials. Dent Mater J 2002; 21(1): 9-19.
37. Nagamine M, Nur Alim N, Itota T, Torii Y, Staninec M, Inoue K. Inhibition of carious lesions in vitro around gallium alloy restorations by fluoride releasing resin-ionomer cement. Dent Mater J 1999; 18(1): 42-53.
38. Six N, Lasfargues JJ, Goldberg M. In vivo study of the pulp reaction to Fuji IX, a glass ionomer cement. J Dent 2000; 28(6): 413-422.