Bigger is not always better: When brains get smaller

Biology Letters

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 283-286

  Safi, Kamran ^a   Seid, Marc A ^a   Dechmann, Dina K N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Chiroptera; Constraints; Encephalization; Energetic costs; Mammals

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; SIZE; TRADE-OFF;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN SIZE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENERGY COST; EVOLUTION; HABITAT STRUCTURE; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CHIROPTERA; MAMMALIA;

EID: 23944434300     PISSN: 17449561     EISSN: 1744957X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0333     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aiello, L. C. & Wheeler, P. 1995 The expensive-tissue hypothesis - the brain and the digestive-system in human and primate evolution. Curr. Anthropol. 36, 199-221.
2. Altshuler, D. L. & Dudley, R. 2002 The ecological and evolutionary interface of hummingbird flight physiology. J. Exp. Biol. 205, 2325-2336.
3. Aschoff, J., Günther, B. & Kramer, K. 1971 Energiehaushalt und Temperaturregulation. München: Urban and Schwarzenberg.
4. Baron, G., Stephan, H. & Frahm, H. D. 1996 Comparative neurobiology in Chiroptera. Basel: Birkhäuser.
5. Barton, R. A. & Harvey, P. H. 2000 Mosaic evolution of brain structure in mammals. Nature 405, 1055-1058.
6. Berger, M. & Hart, J. S. 1974 Physiology and energetics of flight. In Avian biology, vol. IV (ed. D. S. Farner & J. R. King), pp. 260-415. New York: Academic Press.
7. Brenowitz, E. A. 2004 Plasticity of the adult avian song control system. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1016, 560-585.
8. Diaz-Uriarte, R. & Garland, T. 1998 Effects of branch length errors on the performance of phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 47, 654-672.
9. Eisenberg, J. F. & Wilson, D. E. 1978 Relative brain size and feeding strategies in the Chiroptera. Evolution 32, 740-751.
10. Felsenstein, J. 1985 Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1-15.
11. Finlay, B. L. & Darlington, R. B. 1995 Linked regularities in the development and evolution of mammalian brains. Science 268, 1578-1584.
12. Garland, T., Harvey, P. H. & Ives, A. R. 1992 Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41, 18-32.
13. Harvey, P. H. & Krebs, J. R. 1990 Comparing brains. Science 249, 140-146.
14. Hutcheon, J. M., Kirsch, J. W. & Garland, T. 2002 A comparative analysis of brain size in relation to foraging ecology and phylogeny in the Chiroptera. Brain Behav. Evol. 60, 165-180. (doi: 10.1159/000065938.)
15. Jerison, H. J. 1973 Evolution of the brain and intelligence. New York: Academic Press.
16. Jones, K. E. & MacLarnon, A. M. 2004 Affording larger brains: testing hypotheses of mammalian brain evolution on bats. Am. Nat. 164, E20-E31.
17. Martin, R. D. 1981 Relative brain size and basal metabolic-rate in terrestrial vertebrates. Nature 293, 57-60.
18. Norberg, U. M. 1989 Ecological determinants of bat wing shape and echolocation call structure with implications for some fossil bats. In European bat research 1987 (ed. V. Hanàk, T. Horàcek & J. Gaisler), pp. 197-211. Prague: Charles University Press.
19. Norberg, U. M. & Rayner, J. M. V. 1987 Ecological morphology and flight in bats (Mammalia, Chiroptera)-wing adaptations, flight performance, foraging strategy and echolocation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 316, 337-419.
20. Pagel, M. 1994 Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. B 255, 37-45.
21. Pagel, M. 1997 Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zool. Scr. 26, 331-348.
22. Pagel, M. 1999a Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877-884.
23. Pagel, M. 1999b The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 48, 612-622.
24. Purvis, A. & Rambaut, A. 1995 Comparative-analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC) - an Apple-Macintosh application for analyzing comparative data. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 11, 247-251.
25. Safi, K. & Dechmann, D. K. N. 2005 Adaptation of brain regions to habitat complexity: a comparative analysis in bats (Chiroptera). Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 179-186. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2924.)
26. Simmons, N. B. & Geisler, J. H. 1998 Phylogenetic relationships of Icaronycteris, Archaeonycteris, Hassianycteris, and Palaeochiropteryx to extant bat lineages, with comments on the evolution of echolocation and foraging strategies in Microchiroptera. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 4-182.
27. Tobalske, B. W., Hedrick, T. L., Dial, K. P. & Biewener, A. A. 2003 Comparative power curves in bird flight. Nature 421, 363-366.