Visual sensing is seeing: Why "mindsight," in hindsight, is blind

Psychological Science

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 520-524

  Simons, Daniel J ^a   Nevarez, Gabriel ^a   Boot, Walter R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REVIEW; VISION;

HUMANS; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 23944433897     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01568.x     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Mitroff, S.R., Simons, D.J., & Levin, D.T. (2004). Nothing compares two views: Change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1268-1281.
2. Rensink, R.A. (2000a). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 17-42.
3. Rensink, R. A. (2000b). Visual search for change: A probe into the nature of attentional processing. Visual Cognition, 7, 345-376.
4. Rensink, R.A. (2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 245-277.
5. Rensink, R.A. (2004). Visual sensing without seeing. Psychological Science, 15, 27-32.
6. Rensink, R.A., O'Regan, J.K., & Clark, J.J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
7. Simons, D.J., & Levin, D.T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261-267.