Drug identification performance on the basis of observable signs and symptoms

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 843-851

  Shinar, David ^a   Schechtman, Edna ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

Drug detection; Drug identification; Drugs and behavior; Drugs and driving; Forensic science

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ALCOHOLS; DRIVER LICENSING; HEALTH RISKS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; TRAFFIC SURVEYS;

DRUG DETECTION; DRUG IDENTIFICATION; DRUGS AND BEHAVIOR; DRUGS AND DRIVING; FORENSIC SCIENCES;

DRUG DOSAGE;

ADDICTION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CAR DRIVING; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; HUMAN; ISRAEL; LAW ENFORCEMENT; POLICE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; HUMANS; ISRAEL; LAW ENFORCEMENT; POLICE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBSTANCE ABUSE DETECTION; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 23844548316     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Adler, E.V., Burns, M., 1994. Drug recognition Expert (DRE) validation study. Final report to the Arizona Governor's Office of Highway Safety.
2. Bigelow, G.E., Bickel, W.E., Roache, J.D., et al., 1985. Identifying types of drug intoxication: laboratory evaluation of a subject examination procedure. U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Report No. HS 806 753, Washington D.C.
3. Compton, R.P., 1986. Field evaluation of the Los Angeles Police Department evaluation drug detection procedure. U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Report No. HS 807 012, Washington D.C.
4. S.M. Evans, J.R. Troisi, and R.R. Griffiths Tandospirone and alprazolam: comparison of behavioral effects and abuse liability in humans J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 271 2 1994 683 694
5. D.M. Green, and J.A. Swets Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics 1966 Wiley New York
6. S.J. Heishman, E.C. Singleton, and D.J. Crouch Laboratory validation study of Drug Evaluation and Classification Program: ethanol, cocaine, and marijuana J. Anal. Toxicol. 20 1996 466 483
7. S.J. Heishman, E.C. Singleton, and D.J. Crouch Laboratory validation study of Drug Evaluation and Classification Program: alprazolam, d-amphetamine, codeine, and marijuana J. Anal. Toxicol. 22 1998 503 514
8. Jones, R.K., Shinar, D., Walsh, M.J., 2003. State of knowledge of drug impaired driving. U.S. DOT, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Report DOT HS 809 642, Washington D.C.
9. T.H. Kelly, R.W. Foltin, E. Serpick, and M.W. Fischman Behavioral effects of alprazolam in humans Behav. Pharmacol. 8 1 1997 47 57
10. E.M. Kosnoski, R.L. Yolton, K. Citek, C.E. Hayes, and R.B. Evans The drug evaluation classification program: using ocular and other signs to detect drug intoxication J. Am. Optom. Assoc. 69 4 1998 211 227
11. M. Linnoila, and S. Hakkinen Effects of diazepam and codeine, alone and in combination with alcohol, on simulated driving Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 15 4 1974 368 373
12. NHTSA Drug Evaluation and Classification Program, 1991. Briefing paper. National Highway Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington D.C.
13. M. Perez-Reyes, R.E. Hicks, J. Bumberry, A.R. Jeffcoat, and C.E. Cook Interaction between marihuana and ethanol: effects on psychomotor performance Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 12 2 1988 268 276
14. M. Perez-Reyes, W.R. White, S.A. McDonald, and R.E. Hicks Interaction between ethanol and dextroamphetamine: effects on psychomotor performance Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 16 1 1992 75 81
15. K.L. Preston, B. Wolf, J.J. Guarino, and R.R. Griffiths Subjective and behavioral effects of diphenhydramine, lorazepam, and methocarbamol: evaluation of abuse liability J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 262 2 1992 707 720
16. E. Schechtman, and D. Shinar Modeling drug detection and diagnosis with the 'drug evaluation and classification program' Accid. Anal. Prevent. 37 5 2005 852 861
17. Shinar, D., Schechtman, E., 1998. Modeling the DRE evaluation of signs and symptoms to improve the validity of drug impairment diagnosis. Final Report submitted to the National Safety Council and the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
18. J.A. Smith, C.E. Hayes, R.L. Yolton, D.A. Rutledge, and K. Citek Drug recognition expert evaluations made using limited data Forensic Sci. Int. 130 2002 167 173
19. Stuster, J., Burns, M., 1998. Validation of the Standardized Field Sobriety Test battery at BACs below 0.10 percent. U.S. Department of Transportation, Report No. DOT HS 808 839, Washington D.C.
20. L.R. Sutton The effects of alcohol, marihuana and their combination on driving ability J. Stud. Alcohol 44 3 1983 438 445
21. G. Tedeschi, P.R. Bittencourt, A.T. Smith, and A. Richens Effect of amphetamine on saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movement Psychopharmacology 79 2-3 1983 190 192
22. Townsend, T.N., Lane, J., Dewa, C.S., Brittingham, A.M., 1998. Driving after drug or alcohol use: Findings from the 1996 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 99 3273, Washington D.C.
23. Ward, N.J., Dye, L., 1999. Cannabis and driving: a literature review and commentary. DETR Road Safety Research 1999 Report No. 12.