School composition and peer effects in distinctive organizational settings

International Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 505-519

  Marks, Helen M ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Catholic schools; School size; Single sex schools

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844460607     PISSN: 08830355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00017-X     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alexander, K. L. (1987). Cross-sectional comparisons of public and private school effectiveness: A review of evidence and issues. In E. H. Haertel, T. James, & H. M. Levin (Eds.), Comparing public and private schools school achievement, Vol. 2. New York: Falmer Press.
2. Alexander, K. L., & Pallas, A. M. (1983). Private schools and public policy: New evidence on cognitive achievement in public and private schools. Sociology of Education, 56(4), 70-182.
3. Barker, R., & Gump, R. (1964). Big school, small school: High school size and student behavior. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
4. Bryk, A. S., & Driscoll, M. E. (1988). The high school as community: Contextual influences and consequences for students and teachers. Madison, WI: National Center on Effective Secondary Schools, University of Wisconsin.
5. Bryk, A. S., Holland, P. B., Lee, V. E., & Carriedo, R. (1984). Effective catholic schools: An exploration. Washington, DC: National Catholic Education Association.
6. Bryk, A. S., Lee, V. E., & Holland, P. B. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
7. Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
8. Coleman, J. S. (1961). The adolescent society. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
9. Coleman, J. S., & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private high schools: The impact of communities. New York: Basic Books.
10. Coleman, J.S., Hoffer, T., Kilgore, S. (1981). Public and private schools. An analysis of high school and beyond: A national longitudinal study for the 1980s. Final Report to the National Center for Educational Statistics, Contract No. 300-78-0208. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
11. Coleman, J. S., Hoffer, T., & Kilgore, S. (1982). High school achievement: Public, catholic, and private schools compared. New York: Basic Books.
12. Conant, J. B. (1959). The American high school today. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Dale, R.R. (1974). Mixed or single-sex school? Vol. 3. Attainment, attitudes, and overview. London: Routledge & Kagan Paul.
14. Dreeben, R. (2000). Structural effects in education: A history of an idea. In M. T. Hallinan (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 107-135). New York: Kluwer.
15. Feather, N. T. (1974). Coeducation, values, and satisfaction with school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 9-15.
16. Friedkin, N. E., & Necochea, J. (1988). School size and performance: A contingency perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10(3), 237-249.
17. Goldberger, A. S., & Cain, G. G. (1982). The causal analysis of cognitive outcomes in the Coleman, Hoffer and Kilgore report. Sociology of Education, 55(2-3), 103-122.
18. Greeley, A. M. (1982). Catholic high schools and minority students. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
19. Harker, R. (2000). Achievement, gender, and the single-sex/coed debate. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(2), 203-218.
20. Hoffer, T. (1998). Social background and achievement in public and Catholic high schools. Social Psychology of Education, 2, 7-23.
21. Hoffer, T., Greeley, A. M., & Coleman, J. S. (1985). Achievement growth inpublic and Catholic schools. Sociology of Education, 58, 74-97.
22. Hoffer, T., Greeley, A. M., & Coleman, J. S. (1987). Catholic high school effects on achievement growth. In E. H. Haertel, T. James, & H. M. Levin (Eds.), Comparing public and private schools, Vol. 2, school achievement (pp. 67-88). New York: Falmer Press.
23. Jones, J. C., Shallcross, J., & Dennis, C. L. (1972). Coeducation and adolescent values. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 70-85.
24. Keith, T. Z., & Page, E. B. (1985). Do Catholic high schools improve minority student achievement? American Educational Research Journal, 22(3), 337-349.
25. Lee, V. E. (2000). School size and the organization of secondary schools. In M. T. Hallinan (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 327-344). New York: Kluwer.
26. Lee, V. E., & Bryk, A. S. (1986). The effects of single-sex secondary schools on student achievement and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 381-395.
27. Lee, V. E., & Bryk, A. S. (1988). Curriculum tracking as mediating the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education, 67(2), 78-94.
28. Lee, V. E., & Bryk, A. S. (1989). A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education, 62(3), 172-192.
29. Lee, V. E., & Bryk, A. S. (1989). Effects of single-sex schools: Response to Marsh. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 70-85.
30. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1995a). The effects of high school restructuring and size on gains in achievement and engagement for early secondary school students. Sociology of Education, 68(4), 271-290.
31. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1997b). High school size: Which works best, and for whom ? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(3), 205-227.
32. Lee, V. E., Smith, J. B., & Croninger, R. G. (1997). How high school organization influences the equitable distribution of learning in mathematics and science. Sociology of Education, 70(2), 128-150.
33. LePore, P. C., & Warren, J. R. (1997). A comparison of single-sex and coeducational catholic schooling: Evidence from the national educational longitudinal study of 1988. American Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 485-511.
34. Lesko, N. (1988). Symbolizing society: stories, rites, and structure in a Catholic high school. New York: Falmer Press.
35. Louis, K. S., & Marks, H. M. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers' work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 106(4), 532-575.
36. Marks, H. M. (2002). Catholic schools. In D. L. Levinson, A. R. Sadovnik, & P. W. Cookson (Eds.), Education and sociology: an encyclopedia (pp. 75-81). New York: Garland.
37. Marks, H. M. (2002). Single-sex education and coeducation. In D. L. Levinson, A. R. Sadovnik, & P. W. Cookson (Eds.), Education and sociology: an encyclopedia (pp. 539-544). New York: Garland.
38. Marks, H. M., Doane, K. B., & Secada, W. G. (1996a). Support for student achievement. In F. M. Newmann, et al. (Ed.), Authentic achievement: restructuring schools for intellectual quality (pp. 209-227). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39. Marks, G. N., McMillan, J., Hillman, K. (2001). Tertiary entrance performance: The role of student background and school factors (LSAY Research Report No. 22). Camberwell, Vic.: Australian Council for Educational Research.
40. Marsh, H. W. (1989). Effects of attending single-sex and coeducational high schools on achievement, attitudes, behaviors, and sex differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 70-85.
41. Marsh, H. W. (1991). Public, Catholic single-sex, and Catholic coeducational high schools: Their effects on achievement, affect, and behaviors. American Journal of Education, 91, 320-356.
42. Noell, J. (1982). Public and Catholic schools: A reanalysis of "public and private schools". Sociology of Education, 55(2-3), 123-132.
43. Schneider, F. W., & Coutts, L. M. (1982). The high school environment: A comparison of coeducational an single-sex schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 898-906.
44. Sizer, T. R. (1984). Horace's compromise: The dilemma of the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
45. Sorensen, A. B., & Morgan, S. L. (2000). School effects: theoretical and methodological issues. In M. T. Hallinan (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 137-160). New York: Kluwer.
46. Willms, D. (1983). Do private schools produce higher levels of academic achievement? New evidence for the tuition tax credit debate. In T. James, & H. M. Levin (Eds.), Public dollars for private schools: The case of tuition tax credits (pp. 223-231). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.