Making the National Local: Specifying the Conditions for National Government Influence on State Policymaking

State Politics and Policy Quarterly

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 318-344

  Allen, Mahalley D ^a   Pettus, Carrie ^a   Haider Markel, Donald P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844432439     PISSN: 15324400     EISSN: 19461607     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/153244000400400304     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. AdamsGreg D.Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution.American Journal of Political Science. 1997;41:718-37
2. 2000 Hate Crime Laws. New York: Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith; 2000:
3. BaumgartnerFrank R.,JonesBryan D.Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1993:
4. BeckettKatherine,SassonTheodoreThe Politics of Injustice: Crime and Punishment in America. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press; 2000:
5. BerryFrances,BerryWilliam D.State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis.American Political Science Review. 1990;84:395-415
6. BerryFrances Stokes,BerryWilliam D.Theories of the Policy Process. SabatierPaul E., ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1999:
7. BerryWilliam D.,RingquistEvan J.,FordingRichard C.,HansonRussell L.Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960–93.American Journal of Political Science. 1998;42:327-48
8. BohteJohn,MeierKenneth J.The Marble Cake: Introducing Federalism to the Government Growth Equation.Publius. 2000;30:35-46
9. BradleyMartin B.,GreenNorman M.,JohnsonDale E.,LynnMac,McNeilLouChurches and Church Membership in the United States, 1990. Atlanta, GA: Glenmary Research Center; 1992:
10. TodayChristianity. 1997. “States Approving Bans on Partial-Birth Abortion.” Christianity Today, October, A2.
11. ChubbJohn.The Political Economy of Federalism.American Political Science Review. 1985;79:994-1015
12. CohenSusan A.,SaulRebekah.The Campaign against ‘Partial-Birth’ Abortion: Status and Fallout.The Guttmacher Report on Public Policy. 1998;1:305-21
13. ConklinMelanie.Lights Out on Abortion.Progressive. 1998;62 (7): 15-7
14. The Book of the States, 1998–99. Lexington, KY: The Council of State Governments; 1999:
15. DubnickMel,GitelsonAlanThe Nationalization of State Government. HanusJerome J., ed. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books; 1981:
16. EricksonRobert S.,WrightGerald C.,McIverJohn P.Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1993:
17. EyestoneRobert.Confusion, Diffusion, and Innovation.American Political Science Review. 1977;71:441-7
18. GerberBrian J.,TeskePaul.Regulatory Policymaking in the American States: A Review of Theories and Evidence.Political Research Quarterly. 2000;53:849-86
19. GogginMalcolm L.,BowmanAnn O.,LesterJames P.,O'TooleLaurence J.Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Little, Brown; 1990:
20. GrayVirginia.Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study.American Political Science Review. 1973;67:1174-85
21. GrayVirginiaNew Perspectives on American Politics. DoddLawrence C.JillsonCalvin, ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press; 1994:
22. GroganCollen M.The Influence of Federal Mandates on State Medicaid and AFDC Decision-Making.Publius. 1999;29:1-30
23. Haider-MarkelDonald P.The Politics of Social Regulatory Policy: State and Federal Hate Crime Policy and Implementation Effort.Political Research Quarterly. 1998;51:69-88
24. Haider-MarkelDonald P.The Politics of Gay Rights. RimmermanCraig A.WaldKenneth D.WilcoxClyde, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2000:
25. Haider-MarkelDonald P.Policy Diffusion as a Geographical Expansion of the Scope of Political Conflict: Same-Sex Marriage Bans in the 1990s.State Politics and Policy Quarterly. 2001;1:5-26
26. HamiltonChristopher,WellsDonald T.Federalism, Power, and Political Economy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1990:
27. HedgeDavid M.Fiscal Dependency and the State Budget Process.Journal of Politics. 1983;45:198-208
28. HenshawStanley K.,VortJennifer Van.Abortion Services in the United States, 1991 and 1992.Family Planning Perspectives. 1994;26:100-6
29. HeroRodney E.,TolbertCaroline J.A Racial/Ethnic Diversity Interpretation of Politics and Policy in the States of the U.S.American Journal of Political Science. 1996;40:851-71
30. HolbrookThomas M.,DunkEmily Van.Electoral Competition in the American States.American Political Science Review. 1993;87:955-62
31. HwangSung-Don,GrayVirginia.External Limits and Internal Determinants of State Public Policy.Western Political Quarterly. 1991;44:277-99
32. KettlDonald F.The Regulation of American Federalism. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press; 1983:
33. KraneDale.American Federalism, State Governments, and Public Policy: Weaving Together Loose Theoretical Threads.PS: Political Science and Politics. 1993;26:186-91
34. LowryWilliamThe Dimensions of Federalism: State Governments and Pollution Control Policies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1992:
35. MadisonJames. [1788]American Politics: Classic and Contemporary Readings. CiglerAllan J.LoomisBurdett A., ed. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1999:
36. MeierKenneth J.The Politics of Drug Abuse: Laws, Implementation, and Consequences.Western Political Quarterly. 1992;45:41-69
37. MintromMichael.Policy Entrepreneurs and the Diffusion of Innovation.American Journal of Political Science. 1997;41:738-70
38. MintromMichaelPolicy Entrepreneurs and School Choice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2000:
39. MooneyChristopher Z.The Decline of Federalism and the Rise of Morality-Policy Conflict in the United States.Publius. 2000;30:171-88
40. MooneyChristopher Z.Modeling Regional Effects on State Policy Diffusion.Political Research Quarterly. 2001;54:103-24
41. MooneyChristopher Z.,LeeMei-Hsien.Legislating Morality in the American States: The Case of Pre-Roe Abortion Regulation Reform.American Journal of Political Science. 1995;39:599-627
42. MooreArt. 1997. “States Approving Bans on Partial-Birth Abortion: Lawmakers Are No Longer Waiting On Federal Bill.” Christianity Today, December, 97.
43. MooreArt. 1999. “Partial-Birth Bans Make Little Headway in States.” Christianity Today, April, 18.
44. MossbergerKaren.State-Federal Diffusion and Policy Learning: From Enterprise Zones to Empowerment Zones.Publius. 1999;29:31-56
45. MossbergerKarenThe Politics of Ideas and the Spread of Enterprise Zones. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2000:
46. Congressional Record on Choice. Washington, DC: National Abortion Rights Action League;
47. NiceDavid C.The States and the Death Penalty.Western Political Quarterly. 1992;45:1037-48
48. NorranderBarbara.Measuring State Public Opinion with the Senate National Election Study.State Politics and Policy Quarterly. 2001;1:111-25
49. Office of Justice Programs. 2001. “Violent Offender Incarceration and Truth-in-Sentencing Incentive Program.” Office of Justice Grant Program Description. Washington, DC: United States Printing Office.
50. PetersonPaul E.,RabeBarry G.,WongKenneth K.When Federalism Works. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 1986:
51. RingquistEvan J.Environmental Policy. 2000. “Environmental Justice: Normative Concerns and Empirical Evidence.” In Environmental Policy, eds. VigNorman J.KraftMichael E. 4th ed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.VigNorman J.KraftMichael E., ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press; 2000:
52. RisenJames,ThomasJudy L.Wrath of Angels. New York: BasicBooks; 1998:
53. SaulRebekah.Major Developments in the States: 1997.The Guttmacher Report on Public Policy. 1998;1:22-31
54. SollomTerry.State Actions on Reproductive Health Issues in 1996.Family Planning Perspectives. 1997;29:8-14
55. SossJoe,SchramSanford F.,VartanianThomas P.,O'BrienErin.Setting the Terms of Relief: Explaining State Policy Choices in the Devolution Revolution.American Journal of Political Science. 2001;45:378-95
56. StreamChristopher.Health Reform in the States: A Model of State Small Group Health Insurance Market Reforms.Political Research Quarterly. 1999;52:499-526
57. TaggartWilliam A.,WinnRussell G.Imprisonment in the American States.Social Science Quarterly. 1993;74:736-49
58. TompkinsGary L.A Causal Model of State Welfare Expenditures.Journal of Politics. 1975;37:392-416
59. TurnerSusan,GreenwoodPeter W.,ChenElsa,FainTerry.The Impact of Truth-in-Sentencing and Three Strikes Legislation: Prisons, State Budgets, and Crime Rates.Stanford Law and Policy Review. 1999;11:75-91
60. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: United States Bureau of the Census;
61. Hate Crime Statistics, 1993. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Criminal Justice Information Services Division; 1993:
62. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics;
63. Truth in Sentencing: Availability of Federal Influenced Laws in Some States. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office; 1998:
64. VoldenCraig.Asymmetric Effects of Intergovernmental Grants: Analysis and Implications for U.S. Welfare Policy.Publius. 1999;29:51-74
65. WelchSusan,ThompsonKay.The Impact of Federal Incentives on State Policy Innovation.American Journal of Political Science. 1980;24:715-29
66. WoodB. Dan.Modeling Federal Implementation as a System.American Journal of Political Science. 1992;36:40-67