Compatibility effects based on stimulus and response numerosity

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 265-270

  Miller, Jeff ^a   Atkins, Stephen G ^b   Van Nes, Fenna ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23744494212     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196370     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. DEHAENE, S., & COHEN, L. (1997). Cerebral pathways for calculation: Double dissociation between rote verbal and quantitative knowledge of arithmetic. Cortex, 33, 219-250.
2. EIMER, M. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 837-854.
3. FITTS, P. M., & SEEGER, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
4. FRICK, R. W. (1987). The homogeneity effect in counting. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 8-16.
5. FROWEIN, H. W., & SANDERS, A. F. (1978). Effects of visual stimulus degradation, S-R compatibility, and foreperiod duration on choice reaction time and movement time. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12, 106-108.
6. GLENBERG, A. M., & JONA, M. (1991). Temporal coding in rhythm tasks revealed by modality effects. Memory & Cognition, 19, 514-522.
7. GLENBERG, A. M., & KASCHAK, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558-565.
8. GOPHER, D., & RAIJ, D. (1988). Typing with a two-hand chord keyboard: Will the QWERTY become obsolete? IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, & Cybernetics, 18, 601-609.
9. GROSJEAN, M., & MORDKOFF, J. T. (2001). Temporal stimulus-response compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 870-878.
10. HOMMEL, B., MÜSSELER, J., ASCHERSLEBEN, G., & PRINZ, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
11. KORNBLUM, S., HASBROUCQ, T., & OSMAN, A. M. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
12. LURIA, A. R. (1966). Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic Books.
13. MICHAELS, C. F. (1988). S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: Evidence of the detection of affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 231-240.
14. PROCTOR, R. W., & REEVE, T. G. (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
15. REEVE, T. G., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1990). The salient features coding principle for spatial- and symbolic-compatibility effects. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 163-180). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
16. SANDERS, A. F. (1970). Some variables affecting the relation between relative stimulus frequency and choice reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 33, 45-55.
17. SHULMAN, H. G., & MCCONKIE, A. (1973). S-R compatibility, response discriminability, and response codes in choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 98, 375-378.
18. SIMON, J. R. ( 1968). Effect of ear stimulated on reaction time and movement time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 344-346.
19. TEICHNER, W. H., & KREBS, M. J. (1974). Laws of visual choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 81, 75-98.
20. VIVIANI, P. (1979). Choice reaction time for temporal numerosity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 157-167.
21. WELFORD, A. T. (1980). Choice reaction time: Basic concepts. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction times (pp. 73-128). New York: Academic Press.
22. WICKENS, C. D. (1987). Information processing, decision-making, and cognition. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors (pp. 72-107). New York: Wiley.
23. ZBRODOFF, N. J., & LOGAN, G. D. (1990). On the relation between production and verification tasks in the psychology of simple arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 83-97.
24. ZHANG, H., ZHANG, J., & KORNBLUM, S. (1999). A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 386-432.