About the development of decision support systems in psychotherapy: The validation of an individualized prediction model with sequential analysis;Zur entwicklung von entscheidungsregeln in der psychotherapie: Die validierung von vorhersagemodellen mit einer sequenzanalytischen methode

Zeitschrift fur Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 165-175

  Lutz, Wolfgang ^a   Tholen, Sven ^a   Kosfelder, Joachim ^b   Grawe, Klaus ^a   Schulte, Dietmar ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Decision making; Expected treatment response; Growth curve models; Outcome management; Patient focused research; Sequential analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; GERMANY; HUMAN; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PREDICTION; PSYCHOTHERAPY; SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS; SWITZERLAND; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 23744490925     PISSN: 16163443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/1616-3443.34.3.165     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Barkham, M., Rees, A., Stiles, W. B. (1996). Dose-effect relations in time-unlimited psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 927-935.
2. Beutler, L. (2001). Comparisons among quality assurance systems: From outcome assessment to clinical utility. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 197-204.
3. Brabec, B. & Meister, R. (2001). A nearest-neighbor model for regional avalanche forecasting. Annals of Glaciology, 32, 130-134.
4. Caspar, F. (2004). Introduction to a special issue on technological developments and applications in clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 3, 1-18
5. Derogatis, C. R. (1977). SCL-90. Administration, Scoring & Procedures. Manual-I for the R(evised) Version and other Instruments of the Psychopathology Rating Scale Series. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
6. Endicott, J., Spitzer, R. L., Fleiss, J. L. & Cohen, J. (1976). The Global Assessment Scale: Procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 766-771.
7. Franke, G. H. (1995). SCL-90-R. Die Symptom-Checkliste von Derogatis. Göttingen: Beltz Test GmbH.
8. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M. & Williams, J. B. W. (1995). Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I DSM-IV Disorders - Patient Edition (SCID-I/P). New York: Biometrics Research Department, NY State Psychiatric Institute.
9. Fishman, D. B. (1999). The Case for Pragmatic Psychology. New York: New York University Press.
10. Fydrich, T., Nagel, A., Lutz, W. & Richter, R. (2003). Qualitäts-monitoring in der ambulanten Psychotherapie: Modellprojekt der Techniker Krankenkasse (TK). Verhaltenstherapie, 13, 291-295.
11. Grawe, K. (1998). Psychologische Therapie. Bern: Hogrefe.
12. Grawe, K. (2004). Neuropsychotherapie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
13. Grawe, K., Donati, R. & Bernauer, F. (l994). Psychotherapie im Wandel. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
14. Grosse-Holtforth, M. & Grawe, K. (2002). Bern Inventory of Treatment Goals (BIT), Part 1: Development and First Application of a Taxonomy of Treatment Goal Themes (BIT-T). Psychotherapy Research, 12, 79-99.
15. Goldfried, M. R. & Wolfe, B. E. (1998). Toward a More Clinically Valid Approach to Therapy Research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 143-150.
16. Hahlweg, K. (1995). Zur Förderung und Verbreitung psychologischer Verfahren. Ein APA-Bericht. Editorial. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 24, 275-284.
17. Hautzinger, M. (2000). Kognitive Verhaltenstherapie bei psychischen Störungen (3. Aufl.). Weinheim: Beltz, Psychologie Verlags Union.
18. Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureño, G. & Villasenor, V. S. (1988). Inventory of interpersonal problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 885-892.
19. Howard, K. I., Lueger, R. J., Maling, M. S. & Martinovich, Z. (1993). A phase model of psychotherapy: Causal mediation of outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 678-685.
20. Howard, K. I., Moras, K., Brill, P. L., Martinovich, Z. & Lutz, W. (1996). The evaluation of psychotherapy: Efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress. American Psychologist, 51, 1059-64.
21. Jacobson, N. S. & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19.
22. Jennison, C. & Turnbull, B. W. (2000). Group Sequential Tests with Applications to Clinical Trials. CRC: Chapman and Hall.
23. Kazdin, A. E. (2003). Research design in clinical psychology (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
24. Keller, F. (2003). Analyse von Längsschnittdaten: Auswertungsmöglichkeiten mit hierarchischen linearen Modellen. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 32, 51-61.
25. Kosfelder, J., Schulte, D., Lutz, W. & Hartung, J. (2003). Die Bedeutung von Handlungs- und Lageorientierung in der Therapie von Angststörungen. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 32, 176-183.
26. Krause, M. S., Howard, K. I. & Lutz, W. (1998). Exploring individual change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 838-845.
27. Kuhl, J. & Beckmann, J. (1994). Volition and personality. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
28. Lambert, M. (2001). Psychotherapy outcome and quality improvement: Introduction to the special section on patient-focused research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 147-149.
29. Lambert, M., Hansen, N. B. & Finch, A. E. (2001). Patient - focused research: Using patient outcome data to enhance treatment effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 159-172.
30. Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Hawkins, E. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Nielsen, S. L. & Smart, D. W. (2003). Is it time for clinicians to routinely track patient outcome? A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 288-301.
31. Leon, S. C., Kopta, S. M., Howard, K. I. & Lutz, W. (1999). Predicting patients' responses to psychotherapy: Are some more predictable than others? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 698-704.
32. Lueger, R. J., Howard, K. I., Martinovich, Z., Lutz, W., Anderson, E. & Grissom, G., (2001). Assessing treatment progress with individualized models of predicted response. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 150-158.
33. Lueger, R. J., Lutz, W. & Howard, K. I. (2000). The predicted and observed course of psychotherapy for anxiety and mood disorders. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 188, 127-134.
34. Lutz, W. (2002). Patient-focused psychotherapy research and individual treatment progress as scientific groundwork for an empirical based clinical practice. Psychotherapy Research, 12, 251-273.
35. Lutz, W., Grawe, K. & Tholen, S. (2003). Prognose des individuellen Behandlungsverlaufs für unterschiedliche klinischtherapeutische Behandlungsmodalitäten in der Verhaltenstherapie. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 51, 51-70.
36. Lutz, W., Lowry, J., Kopta, M., Einstein, A. D. & Howard, K. I. (2001). Prediction of dose-response relations based on patient characteristics. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 889-900.
37. Lutz, W., Martinovich, Z., Howard, K. I. (1999). Patient profiling: An application of random coefficient regression models to depicting the response of a patient to outpatient psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 571-577.
38. Lutz, W., Martinovich, Z. & Howard, K. I. (2001). Vorhersage individueller Psychotherapieverläufe. Zeitschrift för Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 30, 104-113.
39. Lutz, W., Martinovich, Z., Howard, K. I. & Leon, S. C. (2002). Outcomes management, expected treatment response and severity adjusted provider profiling in outpatient psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59, 1291-1304.
40. Margraf, J. (2000). Lehrbuch der Verhaltenstherapie (2. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
41. Martinovich, Z., Howard, K. I. & Saunders, S. (1996). Some comments on "Assessing Clinical Significance". Psychotherapy Research, 6, 124-132.
42. Petermann, F. (1996). Einzelfalldiagnostik in der klinischen Praxis. Weinheim: Beltz-Verlag.
43. Raudenbush, S. W. (2001). Comparing personal trajectories and drawing causal inferences from longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 501-525.
44. Reinecker, H. & Fiedler, P. (1997). (Hrsg.). Therapieplanung in der modernen Verhaltenstherapie: eine Kontroverse. Lengerich: Pabst.
45. Rounsaville, B. J., Carroll, K. M. & Onken, L. S. (2001). A stage model of behavioral therapies research: getting started and moving on from stage 1. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8, 133-142.
46. Schulte, D. & Eifert, G. H. (2002). What to do when manuals fail? The dual model of psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 312-328.
47. Schulte, D., Hartung, J. & Wilke, F. (1997). Handlungskontrolle der Angstbewältigung. Was macht Reizkonfrontationsverfahren so effektiv? Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 26, 118-128.
48. Schulte, D., Künzel, R., Pepping, G. & Schulte-Bahrenberg, T. (1991). Tailor-made versus standardized therapy of phobic patients. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 14, 67-92.
49. Ullrich de Muynck, R. & Ullrich, R. (1977). Das Emotionalitä tsinventar als Befindlichkeitsmaß Testmanual EMI-B. [The inventory of Emotional Distress- Manual EMI-B]. München: Verlag J. Pfeifer.
50. Whitehead, J. (1997). The design and analysis of sequential clinical trials. Chichester: Wiley.
51. Znoj, H. J., Grawe, K. & Jeger, P. (2000). Die differentielle Bedeutung des Handlungskontrollmodus für klärungs- und bewältigungsorientierte Therapien. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, Forschung und Praxis, 29, 52-59.