Influence of initial water content on the subsequent water sorption and solubility behavior in restorative polymers

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 177-181

  Mortier, Eric ^a   Gerdolle, David A ^a   Dahoun, Abdelsellam ^a   Panighi, Marc M ^a,b  

^a Le Trident A250 ^*  (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOMER; GLASS IONOMER; ORMOCER; POLYMER; RESIN; SILANE DERIVATIVE; WATER;

ABSORPTION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DESICCATION; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; SOLUBILITY;

ABSORPTION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CERAMICS; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DESICCATION; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYMERS; SILANES; SOLUBILITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; WATER;

EID: 23744488815     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Watts DC. The structural scope of biomaterials as amalgam alternatives. In: Dash W, Watts DC. Proceedings of the Conference on Clinically Appropriate Alternatives to Amalgam-Biophysical Factors in Restorative Decision Making. Münich, Oct 30-Nov 2, 1996. Trans Acad Dent Mater 1996: 51-67.
2. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1636-1639.
3. Roulet JF. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-colored alternatives to amalgam. J Dent 1997; 25: 459-473.
4. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res 1990;69: 36-39.
5. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: The influence of the stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 1996; 21: 17-24.
6. Torstenson B, Brännström M. Contraction gap under composite resin restorations: Effect of hygroscopic expansion and thermal stress. Oper Dent 1988; 13: 24-31.
7. Huang C, Tay FR, Cheung GSP, Kei LH, Wei SHY, Pashley DH. Hygroscopic expansion of a compomer and a composite on artificial gap reduction. J Dent 2002; 30: 11-19.
8. Øysaed H, Ruyter IE. Composite for use in posterior teeth: Mechanical properties tested under wet and dry conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 1986;20:261-271.
9. Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V, Paya NJ, Moya F, Meyer JM. Effect of water on the physical properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 1999; 15:71-78.
10. Örtengren U, Elgh U, Spasenoska V, Milleding P, Haasum J and Karlsson S. Watersorption and flexural properties of a composite resin cement. Int J Prosthod 2000; 13: 141-147.
11. Musanje L, Shu M, Darvel BW. Water sorption and mechanical behavior of cosmetic direct restorative materials in artificial saliva. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 394-401.
12. Iwami Y, Yamamoto H, Sato W, Kawai K, Torii M, Ebisu S. Weight change of various light-cured restorative materials after water immersion. Oper Dent 1998; 23: 132-137.
13. Venz S, Dickens B. NIR-spectroscopic investigation on water sorption characteristics of dental resins and composites. J Biomed Mater Res 1991; 25: 1231-1248.
14. Bellenger V, Verdu J, Morel E. Structure-properties relationships for densely cross-linked epoxy-amine systems based on epoxide or amine mixtures. J Mater Science 1989; 24: 63-68.
15. Örtengren U, Andersson F, Elgh U, Terselius B, Karlsson S. Influence of pH and storage time on the sorption and the solubility behaviour of three composite resin materials. J Dent 2001; 29: 35-41.
16. Tanaka K, Taira M, Shintani H, Wakasa K, Yamaki M. Residual monomers (TEGDMA and Bis-GMA) of a set visible light cured dental composite resin when immersed in water. J Oral Rehabil 1991; 18: 353-362.
17. Palmer G, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ. The effect of curing regime on the release of hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) from resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. J Dent 1999; 27: 303-311.
18. Rathbum MA, Craig RG, Hanks CT, Filisko FE. Cytotoxicity of a bis-GMA dental composite before and after leaching in organic solvents. J Biomed Mater Res 1991; 25:443-457.
19. Munksgaard EC, Freund M. Enzymatic hydrolysis of (di)methacrylates and their polymers. Scand J Dent Res 1990; 98: 201-269.
20. Söderholm KJM. Filler teachability during water storage of six composite materials. Scand J Dent Res 1990; 98: 82-87.
21. Stanley HR. Local and systemic responses to dental composites and glass ionomers. Adv Dent Res 1992; 6: 55-64.
22. Heil J, Reifferscheid G, Waldmann P, Leyhausen G, Geurtsen W. Genotoxicity of dental materials. Mutat Res 1996; 368: 181-194.
23. Mcdougall M, Selden JK, Nydegger JR, Carnes DL. Immortalized mouse odontoblast cell line M06-G3 application for in vitro biocompatibility testing. Am J Dent 1997; 11: S11-S16.
24. Söderholm KJM, Mariotti A. Bis-GMA based resins in dentistry. Are they safe? J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130: 201-208.
25. ISO - Dentistry. Polymer-based filling, restorative and luting materials. Geneva: ISO 4049 (15.07.2000): 18-21.
26. Tamai Y, Tanaka H, Nakanishi K. Molecular simulation of permeation of small penetrant through membranes. II. Solubilities. Macromolecules 1995; 28: 2544-2554.
27. rd ed., New York : John Wiley and Sons, 1994; 91.
28. Marcovich NE, Reboredo MM, Aranguren MI. Moisture diffusion in polyester-woodflour composites. Polymer 1999; 40: 7313-7320.
29. Anstice HM, Nicholson JW. Studies on the structure of light-cured glass ionomer cements. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 1992; 3: 447-451.
30. Pedley DG, Skelly PJ, Tighe B. Hydrogels in biomedical applications. Br Polym J 1980; 12: 99.
31. Meyer JC, Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V. Compomers: between glass-ionomer cements and composites. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 529-539.
32. Lekatou A, Faidi SE, Ghidasui D, Lyon SB, Newman RC. Effect of water and its activity on transport properties of glass/epoxy particulate composites. Composite 1997; 28A: 223-236.
33. Sankarapandian M, Shobha K, Kalachandra S, Mc Grath JE, Taylor DE. Characterization of some aromatic diacrylates for dental composite applications. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 1997; 8: 465-468.
34. Sankarapandian M, Xu Q, Mc Grath JE, Taylor DE, Kalachandra S. Influence of resin molecular structure on the processibility and physical behaviour of a dental composite matrix. J Adv Mater 1997; 28: 59-63.
35. Bagis YH, Rueggeberg FA. Mass loss in urethane/TEGDMA- and bis-GMA/TEGDMA-based resin composites during post-cure heating. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 377-380.
36. Ferracane JL. Status of research on new fillers and new resins for dental composites. In: Tagami J, Toledano M, Prati C. Granada International Symposium Advanced Adhesive Dentistry, 3-4 Dec 1999. Graffiche Erredue, Cirimido, Italy, 2000; 3-29.
37. Mohsen NM, Craig RG. Hydrolytic stability of silanated zirconia-silica-urethane dimethacrylate composite. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22: 213-220.
38. Tcharkhtchi A, Bronnec PY, Verdu J. Water absorption characteristics of diglycidylether of butane diol-3,5-diethyl-2,4-diaminotoluene networks. Polymer 2000; 41: 5777-5785.
39. Merdas I, Tcharkhtchi A, Thoruinette F, Verdu J, Dean K, Cook W. Water absorption by uncrosslinked polymers, networks and IPNs having medium to high polarity. Polymer 2002; 43: 4619-4625.