Effects of sex and seating arrangement on selection of leader

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 100, Issue 3 I, 2005, Pages 815-818

  Jackson, Danielle ^a   Engstrom, Erika ^a   Hassenzahl, David M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BEHAVIOR; CONSENSUS; FEMALE; GROUP STRUCTURE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; LEADERSHIP; MALE; REVIEW; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SYMBOLISM;

ADULT; CONSENSUS; FEMALE; GROUP STRUCTURE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LEADERSHIP; MALE; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); PREJUDICE; SEX FACTORS; SYMBOLISM;

EID: 23744476936     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/PMS.100.3.815-818     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. COHEN, J. (1977) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
2. COHEN, J. (1994) The earth is round (p<0.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
3. DAVENPORT, W. G., BROOKER, G., & MUNRO, N. (1971) Factors in social perception: seating position. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 33, 747-752.
4. EAGLY, A., & KARAU, S. J. (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.
5. KNAPP, M. A., & HALL, J. A. (2002) Nonverbal communication in human interaction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
6. LARSEN, R. J., & MARX, L. M. (1986) An introduction to mathematical statistics and its applications. (2nd ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7. PORTER, N., & GEIS, F. (1981) Women and nonverbal leadership cues: when seeing is not believing. In C. Mayo & N. M. Henley (Eds.), Gender and nonverbal behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag. Pp. 39-61.
8. RHODE, D. (2003) The difference 'difference' makes: women and leadership. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univer. Press.
9. ROSSI, J. S. (1997) A case study in the failure of psychology as a cumulative science: the spontaneous recovery of verbal learning. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests'? Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 175-195.
10. STIVERS, C. (2002) Gender images in public administration: legitimacy and the administrative state. (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. VALIAN, V. (1998) Why so slow? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. VALIAN, V. (1999) The cognitive bases of gender bias. Brooklyn Law Review, 65, 1037-1061.