Comparative study between the therapeutic effects of surgical myocardial revascularization and coronary angioplasty in equivalent ischemic situations: Analysis through myocardial scintigraphy with99mTc-Sestamibi;Estudo comparativo entre os efeitos terapêuticos da revascularização cirúrgica do miocárdio e angioplastia coronária em situações isquêmicas equivalentes: Análise através da cintilografia do miocárdio com99mTc-Sestamibi

Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 92-99

  Lourenço Da Costa Moreira, Anellys Emilia ^a,b   Hueb, Whady A ^a   Scares, Paulo Rogério ^a   Meneghetti, José Cláudio ^a   Jorge, Maria Clementina P ^a   Chalela, William A ^a   Martinez Filho, Eulogio E ^a   Almeida De Oliveira, Sérgio ^a   Biscegli Jatene, Fábio ^a   Franchini Ramires, José Antônio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Coronary angioplasty; Myocardial ischemia; Myocardial scintigraphy with 99mTechnetium Sestamibi; Surgical myocardial revascularization

Indexed keywords

METHOXY ISOBUTYL ISONITRILE TECHNETIUM TC 99M;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; ERGOMETRY; EXERCISE TOLERANCE; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HEART SCINTISCANNING; HEART WORK; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

EID: 23744451343     PISSN: 0066782X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bourassa MG, Roubin GS, Detre KM, Sopko G, Krone RJ, Attabuto MJ, Bjerregaad P, Bolling S, Herman MV, Frye RL and the BARI Study Group. Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation: patient screening, selection and recruitment. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75(suppl C):3-8.
2. CABRI Trial Participants. First-year results of CABRI (Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation). Lancet 1995; 46:1179-84.
3. Hamm CW, Reimers J, Ischinger T et al. A randomized study of coronary angioplasty compared with bypass surgery in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331 1037-43.
4. Henderson RA, for the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina Trial. The Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) Trial protocol: a long term study of coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with angina. Br Heart J 1989; 62:411-4.
5. King III SB, Lembo NJ, Weintraub WS et al. Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST): design, recruitment and baseline description of patientes. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75:42C-59C.
6. Rodriguez A, Boullon F, Perez-Baliño N et al. Argentine randomized trial of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease (ERACI): in-hospital results and 1-year follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22:1060-7,
7. Hueb W, Soares PR, Gersh BJ et al. The medicine, angioplasty or surgery study (MASS-II): a randomized controlled clinical trial of medical therapy, coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43:1743-51.
8. Rodriguez A, Bernardi V, Navia J et al. Argentine randomized study: coronary angioplasty with stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple-vessel disease (ERACI II): 30-day and one-year follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37:51-8.
9. Serruys PW, Unger F, Souza JE et al. Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:117-24.
10. Alkeylan A, Miller D, Shaw LJ et al. Influence of race on the prediction of cardiac events with stress technetium-99m sestamibi tomographic imaging in patients with stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1998; 81:293-7.
11. Haronian HL, Remetz MS, Sinusas AJ et al. Myocardial risk area defined by technetium-99m Sestamibi imaging during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: comparison with coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22:1033-43.
12. Faxon DR Ghalilli MD, Jacobs AK et al. The degree of revascularization and outcome after multivessel coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 1992; 123:854-9.
13. Bourassa MG, Yeh W, Holubkov R, Sopko G, Detre KM, for the Investigators of The NHLBI PTCA Registry. Long-term outcome of patients with incomplete vs complete revascularization after multivessel PTCA. A report from the NHLBI PTCA Registry. Eur Heart J 1998; 19:103-11.
14. Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery). J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34:1262-347.
15. Ryan TJ, Bauman WB, Kennedy JW et al. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report for the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures (Commitee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22:2033-54.
16. Smith Jr. SC, Dove JT, Jacobs AK et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. (Revision of the 1993 PTCA Guidelines) A report for the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Commitee to revise the 1993 Guidelines for Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37:2239i-IXVi.
17. Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Beasley JW et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for exercise testing. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing). J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30:260-315.
18. Committee on advanced cardiac imaging and technology, Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association; Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, American College of Cardiology, and board of Directors, Cardiovascular Council, Society of Nuclear Medicine. Standardization of cardiac tomographic imaging. Circulation 1992; 86:338-9.
19. Port SC, Berman D, Garcia E et al. Imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures. J Nucl Cardiol 1999;6:G47-84.
20. Berman DS, Kiat HS, Friedman JD et al. Separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography: a clinical validation study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22:1455-64.
21. The BARI Investigators. Seven-year outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) by treatment and diabetic status. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35:1122-9.
22. Sharir T, Germano G, Kavanagh PB et al. Incremental prognostic value of post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction and volume by gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 1999; 100:1035-42.
23. Alazraki NP, Krawczynska EG, Kosinski AS et al. Prognostic value of thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease after revascularization (The Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST)). Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 1369-74.
24. Cowley MJ, Vandermael M, Topol EJ et al. Is traditionally defined complete revascularization needed for patients with multivessel disease treated by elective coronary angioplasty? J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22:1289-97.
25. Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, Rickards AF et al. Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing coronary angioplasty with bypass surgery. Lancet 1995; 346:1184-9.
26. Sim I, Gupta M, McDonald K, Bourassa MG, Hlatky MA. A meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in multivessel coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:1025-9.
27. Bell MR, Bailey KR, Reeder GS, Lapeyre III AC, Holmes Jr DR. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with multivessel coronary disease: how important is complete revascularization for cardiac event-free survival? J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16:553-62.
28. Jones EL, Craver JM, Guyton RA, Bone DK, Hatcher Jr. CR, Riechwald N. Importance of complete revascularization in performance of the coronary bypass operation. Am J Cardiol 1983; 51:7-12.
29. Samson M, Meester HJ, De Feyter PJ, Strauss B, Serruys PW. Successful multiple segment coronary angioplasty: effect of completeness of revascularization in single-vessel multilesions and multivessels. Am Heart J 1990; 120:1-12.
30. Bourassa MG, Kip KE, Jacobs AK et al. Is a strategy of intended incomplete percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty revascularization acceptable in nondiabetic patients who are candidates for coronary artery bypass graft surgery? The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33:167-36.
31. King III SB, Lembo NJ, Weintraub WS et al. A randomized trial comparing angioplasty with coronary by pass surgery. N Engl J Med 1994; 331:1044-50.
32. RITA Trial Participants. Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial. Lancet 1993; 341:573-80.
33. The BARI Investigators. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. New Engl J Med 1996; 335:217-25.
34. Hannan EL, Racz MJ, McCallister BD et al. A comparison of three-year survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33:63-72.
35. Jones RH, Kesler K, Phillips III HR et al. Long-term survival benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 111:1013-25.
36. Botas J, Stadius ML, Bourassa MG et al. Angiographic correlates of lesion relevance and suitability for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation study (BARI). Am J Cardiol 1996; 77:805-14.
37. Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ et al. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease-implications for patient selection. Circulation 1990; 82:1193-202.