A comparison of three-year survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 63-72

  Hannan, Edward L ^a   Racz, Michael J ^a   McCallister, Ben D ^b   Ryan, Thomas J ^c   Arani, Djavad T ^d   Wayne Isom, C O ^e   Jones, Robert H ^f  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b SAINT LUKE S MID AMERICA HEART INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d BUFFALO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURVIVAL; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY DISEASE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; REGISTRIES; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 0032895986     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00540-3     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Favaloro RG. Saphenous vein graft in the surgical treatment of coronary artery disease: operative technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1969;58:179-85.
2. Gruntzig AR, Senning A, Siegenthaler WE. Nonoperative dilatation of coronary artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1979;301:61-8.
3. RITA Trial Participants. Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial. Lancet 1993;341:573-80.
4. King SB III, Lembo NJ, Weintraub WS, et al. A randomized trial comparing coronary angioplasty with coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1044-50.
5. Hamm CW, Reimer J, Ischinger T, Rupprecht H, Berger J, Bleifeld W, German Angioplasty Bypass Surgery Investigation. A randomized study of coronary angioplasty compared with bypass surgery inpatients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1037-43.
6. The BARI Investigators. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 1996;335:217-35.
7. Jones RH, Kesler K, Phillips HR III, et al. Long-term survival benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:1013-25.
8. The Writing Group for the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization (BARI) Investigators. Five-year clinical and functional outcome comparing bypass surgery and angioplasty in patients with multivessel coronary disease: a multicenter randomized trial. JAMA 1997;277:715-21.
9. Califf RM, Harrell FE, Lee KL, et al. The evolution of medical and surgical therapy for coronary artery disease: a 15-year perspective. JAMA 1989;261:2077-86.
10. Favaloro RG. Direct myocardial revascularization: a 10 year journey. Myths and realities. Louis F. Bishop Lecture. Am J Cardiol 1979;43:109-29.
11. Ringqvist I, Fisher LD, Mock M, et al. Prognostic value of angiographic indices of coronary artery disease from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). J Clin Invest 1983;6:1854-66.
12. Gum PA, O'Keefe JH Jr, Borkon AM, et al. Bypass surgery versus coronary angioplasty for revascularization of treated diabetic patients. Circulation 1997;96(Suppl 9):II-7-10.
13. Howard G, Chambless LE, Kronmal RA. Assessing differences in clinical trials comparing surgical vs. nonsurgical therapy: using common (statistical) sense. JAMA 1997;278:1432-6.