Clinical and radiological outcome of hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 219-223

  Gosens, T ^a   Van Langelaan, E J ^b  

^a CPRLab   (Netherlands)

^b RIJNLAND HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYAPATITE;

ADULT; AGED; CANCELLOUS BONE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORTICAL BONE; DISEASE COURSE; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR HEAD PROSTHESIS; FOLLOW UP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; MALLORY BODY; OSTEOSCLEROSIS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGY; REOPERATION; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DURAPATITE; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 23744438465     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-005-0659-1     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Ghazal ME, Lee MH (1994) Pain in the thigh following total hip replacement with a porous coated anatomic prosthesis for osteoarthrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:1464-1470
2. Coathup MJ, Blunn GW, Flynn N, Williams C, Thomas NP (2000) A comparison of bone remodelling around hydroxyapatite-coated porous-coated and grit-blasted hip replacements retrieved at post-mortem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:118-123
3. D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, Jaffe WL (1992) Hydroxylapatite-coated hip implants: multicentre three year clinical and roentgenographic results. Clin Ortop 285:102-115
4. Dohmae Y, Bechtold JE, Sherman RE, Puno RM, Gustilo RB (1988) Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. Clin Ortop 236:214-220
5. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH (1987) Porous coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:44-55
6. Gosens T, Hoefnagels NHM, Dhert WJA, van Langelaan EJ, Geesink RGT, Bulstra SK (2005) Translation and validation of the 12 item questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. Acta Orthop Scand in press
7. Gruen TA, McNeice JM, Amstutz HC (1979) Modes of failure of cemented stem type femoral components. A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Ortop 141:17-29
8. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737-755
9. Head WC, Wagner RA, Emerson RH Jr, Malinin TI (1994) Revision total hip arthroplasty in the deficient femur with aproximal load bearing prosthesis. Clin Ortop 298:119-126
10. Huiskes R (1993) Failed innovation in total hip replacement: diagnosis and proposals for a cure. Acta Orthop Scand 64:699-716
11. Izquerdo RJ, Northmore-Ball MD (1994) Long-term results of revision hip arthroplasty: survival analysis with special reference to the femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:34-39
12. Kadoya Y, Kobayashi A, Ohashi H (1998) Wear and osteolysis in total joint replacements. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 278:1-16
13. Krause WR, Krug W, Miller J (1992) Strength of the cement-bone interface. Clin Ortop 163:290-299
14. Mulliken BD, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Nayak N (1996) A tapered titanium femoral stem inserted without cement in a total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:1214-1225
15. Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J (1999) Minimum 10-year results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Ortop 369:230-242
16. Peters CL, Rivero DP, Kull LR, Jacobs JJ, Rodsenberg AG, Galante JO (1995) Revision total hip arthroplasty without cement: subsidence of proximally porous coated femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1217-1226
17. Rahmy AIA, Gosens T, Blake GM, Tonino AJ, Fogelman I (2004) Periprosthetic bone remodeling of two types of uncemented femoral implants with a proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone quality on periprosthetic bone loss. Osteoporos Int 15:281-284
18. Robinson AHN, Palmer CR, Villar RN (1999) Is revision as good as primary hip replacement? A comparison of quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:42-45
19. Søballe K, Hansen ES, Brockstedt-Rasmussen H, Bunger C (1993) Hydroxyapatite coating converts fibrous tissue to bone around loaded implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:270-278
20. Tonino AJ, Therin M, Doyle C (1999) Hydroxyapatite coated femoral stems: histology and histomorphometry around five components retrieved at autopsy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:148
21. Tonino AJ, Rahmy AIA (2000) The International ABG Study Group. The hydroxyapatite-ABG hip system. J Arthroplast 11: 534-542
22. Woolson ST, Delaney TJ (1994) Failure of proximally porous coated femoral prostheses in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 10(suppl):S22-S28
23. Yee AJM, Kreder HK, Bookman I, Davey JR (1999) A randomised trial of hydroxyapatite coated prostheses in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Ortop 366:120-132