In vivo robotic laparoscopy

Surgical Innovation

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 177-181

  Oleynikov, Dmitry ^a   Rentschler, Mark E ^b   Dumpert, Jason ^b   Platt, Stephen R ^b   Farritor, Shane M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

In vivo robots; Laparoscopic procedure; Surgical feedback

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL WALL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CAMERA; CONTROLLED STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INJURY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; NONHUMAN; PERITONEAL CAVITY; ROBOTICS; SKILL; SURGEON; SWINE; TROCAR;

EID: 23644461804     PISSN: 15533506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/155335060501200219     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Treat M: A surgeon's perspective on the difficulties of laparoscopic surgery. In Taylor R, Lavallée S, Burdea G, and Mösges R, editors: Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology and Clinical Application. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 42:559-560,1996.
2. Tendick F, Jennings R, Tharp G, Stark L: Perception and manipulation problems in endoscope surgery. In Taylor R, Lavallée S, Burdea G, and Mösges R, editors: Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology and Clinical Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 44:567-576, 1996.
3. Wolfe B, Gardiner B, Leary B, et al: Endoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of complications. Arch Surg 126(10): 1192-1196, 1991.
4. Southern Surgeons Club: a Prospective Analysis of 1518 Laparoscopic Colecystectomies. N Engl J Med 324:1073-1078, 1991.
5. Schippers E, Schumpelick V: Requirements and possibilities of computer-assisted endoscope surgery. In: Taylor R, Lavallée S, Burdea G, Mösges R, editors: Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology and Clinical Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996, 43:561-566.
6. Medtech Insight LLC, Mission Viejo, CA, 2000.
7. Lo P, Ahmed N, Chung RS: Which laparoscopic operations are the fastest growing in residency programs? (abstract) Surg Endosc 15(suppl 1):S145, 2001.
8. Ballantyne GH: Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Surg Endosc 16:1389-1402, 2002.
9. Kim VB, Chapman WHH, Albrecht RJ, B et al: Early experience with telemanipulative robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using da Vinci. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12(1): 33-44, 2002.
10. Kang H, Wen JT: Robotic assistants aid surgeons during minimally invasive procedures. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 20:94-104, 2001.
11. Oleynikov D, Rentschler M, Hadzialic A, et al: Miniature robots can assist in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc [Epub ahead of print] Mar 8, 2005.
12. Rentschler M, Dumpert J, Platt S, et al: Mobile in vivo robots can assist in abdominal exploration. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), Fort Lauderdale, FL, April 13-16, 2005.
13. Rentschler M, Oleynikov D, Hadzialic A, et al: In vivo camera robots provide improved vision for laparoscopic surgery. Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS) Conference, Chicago, IL, June 23-26, 2004.
14. Rentschler M, Hadzialic A, Dumpert J, et al: In vivo robots for laparoscopic surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform 98:316-22, 2004.
15. Rentschler M, Dumpert J, Platt S, et al: Toward in vivo mobility. Stud Health Technol Inform 111:397-403, 2005.
16. Rentschler M, Dumpert J, Hadzialic A, et al: Theoretical and experimental analysis of in vivo wheeled mobility. ASME 28th Biennial Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 2004-57468, Salt City City, UT Sept 28-Oct 2, 2004.