Relationship between cochlear implant outcome and the diameter of the cochlear nerve depicted on MRI

Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Supplement

Volumn , Issue 551, 2004, Pages 56-59

  Morita, Takeshi ^a   Naito, Yasushi ^a   Tsuji, Jun ^a   Nakamura, Teruko ^a   Yamaguchi, Shinobu ^a   Ito, Juichi ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Cochlear nerve; Eighth cranial nerve; IT MAIS; MRI; Prelingually deaf

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NERVE; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INFANT; INFANT TODDLER MEANINGFUL AUDITORY INTEGRATION SCALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; VESTIBULOCOCHLEAR NERVE;

EID: 1642345261     PISSN: 03655237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03655230310016708     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Zimmerman-Phillips S, Robbins AM, Osberger MJ. Assessing cochlear implant benefit in very young children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2000; 185: 42-3.
2. Morita T, Naito Y, Hirai T, Yamaguchi S, Ito J. The relationship between the intraoperative ECAP threshold and postoperative behavioral levels: the difference between postlingually deafened adults and prelingually deafened pediatric cochlear implant users. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2003; 260: 67-72.
3. Naito Y, Honjo I, Takahashi H, et al. Surface-coil magnetic resonance imaging of the internal auditory canal and the inner ear. Preliminary report. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104: 776-82.
4. Nadol JB Jr, Xu WZ. Diameter of the cochlear nerve in deaf humans: implications for cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992; 101: 988-93.
5. Glastonbury CM, Davidson HC, Harnsberger HR, Butler J, Kertesz TR, Shelton C. Imaging findings of cochlear nerve deficiency. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 635-43.
6. Incesulu A, Nadol JB Jr. Correlation of acoustic threshold measures and spiral ganglion cell survival in severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss: implications for cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998; 107: 906-11.
7. Gantz BJ, Tyler RS, Knutson JF, et al. Evaluation of five different cochlear implant designs: audiologic assessment and predictors of performance. Laryngoscope 1988; 98: 1100-6.
8. Kiefer J, von Ilberg C, Reimer B, et al. Results of cochlear implantation in patients with severe to profound hearing loss -implications for patient selection. Audiology 1998; 37: 382-95.
9. Rubinstein JT, Parkinson WS, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ. Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. Am J Otol 1999; 20: 445-52.
10. Van Dijk JE, van Olphen AF, Langereis MC, Mens LH, Brokx JP, Smoorenburg GF. Predictors of cochlear implant performance. Audiology 1999; 38: 109-16.
11. Nadol JB Jr, Shiao JY, Burgess BJ, et al. Histopathology of cochlear implants in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001; 110: 883-91.
12. Nadol JB Jr, Ketten DR, Burgess BJ. Otopathology in a case of multichannel cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 1994; 104: 299-303.