Hemodialysis adequacy: Basic essentials and practical points for the nephrologist in training

Hemodialysis International

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 241-254

  Depner, Thomas A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

UREA;

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL KIDNEY; BLOOD SAMPLING; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DISEASE MARKER; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EQUILIBRIUM DIALYSIS; HEMODIALYSIS; HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT; HUMAN; KIDNEY CLEARANCE; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NEPHROLOGY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; SOLUTE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRAFILTRATION; UREA NITROGEN BLOOD LEVEL; UREMIA;

BLOOD SPECIMEN COLLECTION; HUMANS; KIDNEY; METABOLIC CLEARANCE RATE; RENAL DIALYSIS; ULTRAFILTRATION; UREMIA;

EID: 23644447011     PISSN: 14927535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1492-7535.2005.01138.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Lysaght MJ. Maintenance dialysis population dynamics. Current trends and long-term implications. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002; 13(Suppl. 1):S37-S40.
2. Eknoyan G, Beck GJ, Cheung AK, Daugirdas JT, Greene T, Kusek JW, Allon M, Bailey J, Delmez JA, Depner TA, Dwyer JT, Levey AS, Levin NW, Milford E, Ornt DB, Rocco MV, Schulman G, Schwab SJ, Teehan BP, Toto R; Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study Group. Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux on mortality and morbidity in chronic hemodialysis patients. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347(25):2010-2019.
3. Boure T, Vanholder R. Biochemical and clinical evidence for uremic toxicity. Artif Organs. 2004; 28(3):248-253.
4. Gulyassy PF, Depner TA. Impaired binding of drugs and endogenous ligands in renal diseases. Am J Kidney Dis. 1983; 2(6):578-601.
5. Fagugli RM, Buoncristiani U, Lameire N, Vanholder R. Behavior of non-protein-bound and protein-bound uremic solutes during daily hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002; 40(2):339-347.
6. Lowrie EG, Laird NM, Parker TF, Sargent JA. Effect of the hemodialysis prescription on patient morbidity: Report from the National Cooperative Dialysis Study. N Engl J Med. 1981; 305(20):1176-1181.
7. Gotch FA, Panlilio FM, Buyaki RA, Wang EX, Folden TI, Levin NW. Mechanisms determining the ratio of conductivity clearance to urea clearance. Kidney Int Suppl. 2004; 89:S3-S24.
8. Petitclerc T, Bene B, Jacobs C, Jaudon MC, Goux N. Non-invasive monitoring of effective dialysis dose delivered to the haemodialysis patient. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1995; 10(2):212-216.
9. Sargent JA, Gotch FA. Mathematic modeling of dialysis therapy. Kidney Int Suppl. 1980; 10:S2-S10.
10. Depner TA. Single-compartment model. Prescribing Hemodialysis: A Guide to Urea Modeling. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991:65-89.
11. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Daugirdas JT, Agodoa LY, Jones CA, Port FK. Body size, dose of hemodialysis, and mortality. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000; 35(1):80-88.
12. Renkin EM, Gilmore JP. Glomerular filtration. In: Orloff J, Berliner RW, editors. Handbook of Physiology - Renal Physiology. Washington (DC): American Physiology Society; 1973:185-248.
13. Borah MF, Schoenfeld PY, Gotch FA, Sargent JA, Wolfson M, Humphreys MH. Nitrogen balance during intermittent dialysis therapy of uremia. Kidney Int. 1978; 14(4):491-500.
14. Michaels AS. Operating parameters and performance criteria for hemodialyzers and other membrane-separation devices. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1966; 12:387-392.
15. Yeun JY, Depner TA. Principles of hemodialysis. In: Pereira BJ, Sayegh MH, Blake P, editors. Chronic Kidney Disease, Dialysis, and Transplantation. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2005:307-340.
16. Jaffrin MY, Ding LH, Laurent JM. Simultaneous convective and diffusive mass transfers in a hemodialyser, J Biomech Eng. 1990 May; 112(2):212-219.
17. Granger A, Vantard G, Vantelon J, Perrone B. A mathematical approach of simultaneous dialysis and filtration. Proc Clin Dial Transplant Forum. 1978; 5:174-177.
18. Depner TA, Rizwan S, Cheer AY, Wagner JM, Eder LA. High venous urea concentrations in the opposite arm: A consequence of hemodialysis-induced compartment disequilibrium. ASAIO J. 1991; 37(3):141-143.
19. Schneditz D, Kaufman AM, Polaschegg HD, Levin NW, Daugirdas JT. Cardiopulmonary recirculation during hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 1992; 42(6):1450-1456.
20. Daugirdas JT, Simplified equations for monitoring Kt/V, PCRn, eKt/V, and ePCRn. Adv Ren Replace Ther. 1995; 2(4):295-304.
21. Tattersall JE, DeTakats D, Chamney P, Greenwood RN, Farrington K. The post-hemodialysis rebound. Predicting and quantifying its effect on Kt/V. Kidney Int. 1996; 50(6):2094-2102.
22. Smye SW, Evans JH, Will E, Brocklebank JT. Paediatric haemodialysis: Estimation of treatment efficiency in the presence of urea rebound. Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1992; 13(1):51-62.
23. Depner TA, Daugirdas JT. Equations for normalized protein catabolic rate based on two-point modeling of hemodialysis urea kinetics. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996; 7(5):780-785.
24. Gotch FA. The current place of urea kinetic modelling with respect to different dialysis modalities. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998; 13(Suppl. 6):10-14.
25. Depner TA. Benefits of more frequent dialysis: Lower TAC at the same Kt/V. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998; 13(Suppl 6):20-24.
26. Depner TA, Bhat A. Quantifying daily hemodialysis. Semin Dial. 2004; 17(2):79-84.
27. Gotch FA. Kinetic modeling in hemodialysis. In: Nissenson AR, Fine RN, Gentile DE, editors. Clinical Dialysis. 3rd ed. Norwalk (CT): Appleton & Lange; 1995:156-188.
28. Bargman JM, Thorpe KE, Churchill DN. Relative contribution of residual renal function and peritoneal clearance to adequacy of dialysis: A reanalysis of the CANUSA study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001; 12(10):2158-2162.
29. Termorshuizen F, Dekker FW, van Manen JG, Korevaar JC, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT. Relative contribution of residual renal function and different measures of adequacy to survival in hemodialysis patients: An analysis of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD)-2. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004; 15(4):1061-1070.
30. Depner TA. Daily hemodialysis efficiency: An analysis of solute kinetics. Adv Ren Replace Ther. 2001; 8(4):227-235.
31. Casino FG, Lopez T. The equivalent renal urea clearance: A new parameter to assess dialysis dose. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996; 11(8):1574-1581.
32. Depner TA. Why daily hemodialysis is better: Solute kinetics. Semin Dial. 1999; 12(6):462-471.
33. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis adequacy: Update 2000. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001; 37(1 Suppl 1):S7-S64.
34. McCann L, Feldman C, Hornberger J, Balanger S, Maru L, Torres M, Tootell F, Gotch F. Effect of intradialytic parenteral nutrition on delivered Kt/V. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999; 33(6):1131-1135.