So what happens when the tutor walks in? Some observations on interaction in a university discussion group with and without the tutor

Journal of English for Academic Purposes

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 21-33

  Basturkmen, Helen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23444456341     PISSN: 14751585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00034-6     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bashiruddin, A., Edge, J., & Hughes-Pelegrin, E. (1990). Who speaks in seminars? Status, culture and gender at Durham University". In R. Clark, et al. (Eds.), British studies in applied linguistics 5: Language and power (pp. 74-84). London: British Association of Applied Linguistics Publication.
2. Basturkmen, H. (1995). The discourse of academic seminars: structures and strategies of interaction. Unpublished PhD thesis, Aston University.
3. Basturkmen, H. (2000). The organisation of discussion in university settings. Text, 20, 249-269.
4. Baumgart, N. (1976). Verbal interaction in university tutorials. Higher Education, 5, 301-317.
5. Berry, M. (1981). Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: a multi layered approach to exchange structure. In M. Coulthard, & M. Montgomery (Eds.), Studies in discourse analysis. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
6. Brown, G., & Alkins, M. (1988). Effective teaching in higher education. London: Methuen.
7. Cheung, D. S. L. (1984). Analyzing the discourse structure of small group interaction. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Birmingham.
8. Coulthard, M., & Brazil, D. (1992). Exchange structure. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in spoken discourse analysis. London: Routledge.
9. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analysing talk at work: an introduction. In P. Drew, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings (pp. 21-48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Elder, C., Erlam, R. & von Randow, J. (2002). The DELNA initiative at the University of Auckland: diagnosing the academic English needs of university entrants. University of Auckland Public Lecture Series April 2002.
11. Ellis, D. G. (1999). Research on social interaction and the micro-macro issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(1-2), 31-40.
12. Evans, C. (1983). Studies in French literature. In G. Collier (Ed.), The management of peer group learning: syndicate methods in higher education. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
13. Ferris, D. R. (1998). Students' views on academic aural/oral skills: a comparative needs analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 315-339.
14. Flowerdew, J., & Peacock, M. (2001). The EAP curriculum: issues, methods and challenges. In J. Flowerdew, & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic, purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Furneaux, C., Locke, C. Robinson, P., & Tonkyn A. (1991). Talking heads and shifting bottoms: the ethnography of academic seminars. In P. Adams, B. Heaton, & P. Howarth (Eds), Socio-cultural issues in English for specific purposes (pp. 75-88). Modern English Publications.
16. Graumann, C. (1995). Commonality, mutuality, reciprocity: a conceptual introduction. In I. Markova, C. Graumann, & K. Foppa (Eds.), Mutuality in dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Hoey, M. (1992). Some properties of spoken discourse. In R. Bowers, & C. Brumfit (Eds.), Applied linguistics and language teaching. Modern English Publications in association with the British Council.
18. Lineel, P. (1990). The power of dialogue dynamics. In I. Markova, & K. Foppa (Eds.), The dynamics of dialogue. New York: Springer.
19. Lineel, P., Gustavsson, L., & Juvonen, P. (1988). Interactional dominance in dyadic communication: a presentation of initiative-response analysis. Linguistics, 26, 415-442.
20. Linell, P. (1995). Troubles with mutualities: towards a dialogical theory of misunderstanding and miscommunication. In I. Markova, & K. Foppa (Eds.), The dynamics of dialogue. New York: Springer.
21. Pittman, J. (1999). The historical and emergent enactment of identity in language. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 111-117.
22. Robinson, P., Strong, G., Whittle, J., & Nobe, S. (2001). The development of EAP oral discussion ability. In J. Flowerdew, & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic, purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Rosenfeld, M., Leung, S., & Oltman, P. (2001). The reading, writing, speaking and listening tasks important for academic success at the undergraduate and postgraduate levels (TOEFL Monograph Series 21). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
24. Sinclair, J. McH., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: the English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
25. Sinclair, J. McH., & Coulthard, M. (1992). Towards an analysis of discourse. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in spoken discourse analysis (pp. 50-78). London: Routledge.
26. Stokoe, E. H. (2000). Constructing topicality in university students' small-group discussion: a conversation analytic approach. Language and Education, 14, 184-203.
27. Tapper, J. (1992). Oral academic discourse of international college students. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.
28. Tapper, J. (1996). Exchange patterns in the oral discourse of international students in university classrooms. Discourse Processes, 22, 25-55.
29. Thonus, T. (1999). Dominance in academic writing tutorials: gender, language proficiency, and the offering of suggestions. Discourse and Society, 10, 225-248.
30. Tracy, K., & Naughton, J. (1994). The identity work of questioning in intellectual discussion. Communication Monographs, 61, 281-302.
31. Tsui, A. B. M. (1989). Beyond the adjacency pair. Language in Society, 18, 545-564.
32. Tsui, A. B. M. (1994). English conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.