A consideration of the UK Government's proposals for business improvement districts in England. Issues and uncertainties

Property Management

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 194-203

  Blackwell, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Business improvement; Counsil tax; England; Property finance; Property management

Indexed keywords

EID: 23444452525     PISSN: 02637472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02637470510603538     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Berman, H. (1997), Managing the Micropolis: Proposals to Strengthen Business Improvement District Performance and Accountability, Council of the City of New York, New York, NY.
2. Central Rating List Regulations (1994), SI 1994/3121.
3. Consultation Paper on Draft Business Improvement Districts (England) Regulations (2004), Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London.
4. Levy, P.R. (2001), "Paying for the public life", Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 124-31.
5. Local Government Finance Act 1988 (1988), National Assembly for Wales, Carmarthen.
6. Mitchell, J. (1999), Business Improvement Districts and Innovative Service Delivery, PricewaterhouseCoopers, New York, NY.
7. Mitchell, J. (2001), "Business improvement districts and the 'new' revitalization of downtown", Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 115-23.
8. Non-Domestic Rating (Railways, Telecommunications and Canals) Regulations (1994), SI 1994/3123.
9. Poor Rate Exemption Act 1840 (1840), The Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales, London.
10. Poor Relief Act 1601 (1601), British Government, London.
11. SI 1989/1060 as amended by SI 1993/616 (1993), The Local Government reorganisation (Wales), Cardiff.
12. Symes, M. and Steel, M. (2003), "Lessons from America: The role of business improvement districts as an agent of urban regeneration", Town Planning Review, Vol. 74 No. 3, pp. 301-13.