Assessing maturity and effectiveness of enterprise performance measurement systems

International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

Volumn 54, Issue 5-6, 2005, Pages 400-418

  Van Aken, Eileen M ^a   Letens, Geert ^b,e   Coleman, Garry D ^c   Farris, Jennifer ^a   Van Goubergen, Dirk ^d  

^a Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University   (United States)

^b Belgian Armed Forces   (Belgium)

^c Transformation Systems Inc   (United States)

^d GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^e Royal Higher Defence Institute   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Belgium; Organizational change; Performance measures; Public sector organizations

Indexed keywords

EID: 23444451280     PISSN: 17410401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/17410400510604557     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Andersen, B. and Hendriksen, B. (2004), "Performance measurement system success depends on design alignment with the core purpose of its implementation", in Neely, A., Kennerley, M. and Walters, A. (Eds), Fourth International Conference on Performance Measurement and Management, 28-30 July, Performance Measurement Association, Edinburgh, pp. 27-34.
2. Balanced Scorecard Collaborative (2003), "BSC online member survey 2003, executive summary", Balanced Scorecard Collaborative, available at: www.bscol.com.
3. Baldrige National Quality Program (BNQP) (2002), Criteria for Performance Excellence, Author, Gaithersburg, MD.
4. Bauer, J., Tanner, S.J. and Neely, A. (2004), "Benchmarking performance measurement: a consortium benchmarking study", in Neely, A., Kennerley, M. and Walters, A. (Eds), Fourth International Conference on Performance Measurement and Management, 28-30 July, Performance Measurement Association, Edinburgh, pp. 1021-8.
5. Bititci, U.S., Turner, T. and Begeman, C. (2000), "Dynamics of performance measurement systems", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 692-704.
6. Bourne, M., Mills, J., Wilcox, M., Neely, A. and Platts, A. (2000), "Designing, implementing, and updating performance measurement systems", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 20 No. 7, pp. 754-71.
7. Brown, M.G. (2000), Winning Score: How to Design and Implement Organizational Scorecards, Productivity, Portland, OR.
8. Creed, D. and Coleman, G. (2002), "Balanced scorecard software - what, why, when, how, and how not to do it", Proceedings of the Annual Institute of Industrial Engineers' Conference [CD-ROM], 19-22 May, Institute of Industrial Engineers, Orlando, FL.
9. Coleman, G.D., Van Aken, E.M. and Shen, J. (2002), "Estimating interrater reliability for a state quality award", Quality Management Journal, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 39-58.
10. De Waal, A.A. (2002), Quest for Balance: The Human Element in Performance Management Systems, Wiley, New York, NY.
11. European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) (1999), "The EFQM excellence model", EFQM, Brussels.
12. Kaplan, R. (1998), "Innovation action research: creating new management theory and practice", Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 10, pp. 89-118.
13. Kaplan, R. (2002), "Keynote address", paper presented at the Third International Conference on the Theory and Practice of Performance Measurement and Management, Performance Measurement Association, Boston, MA, 19-21 July.
14. Kaplan, R. and Norton, D.P. (1996), "Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74 No. 1, pp. 75-85.
15. Kennerley, M. and Neely, A. (2002), "A framework of the factors affecting the evolution of performance measurement systems", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 22 No. 11, pp. 1222-45.
16. Kennerley, M. and Neely, A. (2003), "Measuring performance in a changing business environment", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 213-29.
17. Kilmann, R.H. (1989), Managing Beyond the Quick Fix, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
18. Kotter, J.P. (1996), Leading Change, Harvard Press, Boston, MA.
19. Lawler, E.E. (1996), From the Ground Up: Six Principles for Building the New Logic Corporation, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
20. Marr, B. and Neely, A. (2001), The Balanced Scorecard Software Report, Gartner, Stamford, CT, and Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield.
21. Marr, B. and Schiuma, G. (2003), "Business performance measurement: past, present, and future", Management Decision, Vol. 41 No. 8, pp. 680-7.
22. Mohrman, A.M., Mohrman, S.A., Ledford, G.E., Cummings, T.G. and Lawler, E.E. et al. (1989), Large-Scale Organizational Change, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
23. Neely, A. (1999), "The performance measurement revolution: why now and what next?", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 205-28.
24. Neely, A. and Adams, C. (2000), "Perspectives on performance: the performance prism", in Bourne, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Performance Measurement, Gee Publishing, London.
25. Neely, A., Mills, J., Platts, K., Richards, H., Gregory, M., Bourne, M. and Kennerley, M. (2000), "Performance measurement system design: developing and testing a process-based approach", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 20 No. 10, pp. 1119-45.
26. Nørreklit, H. (2003), "The balanced scorecard: what is the score? A rhetorical analysis of the balanced scorecard", Accounting, Organizations, and Society, Vol. 28, pp. 591-619.
27. Pfeffer, J. and Sutton, R.I. (2000), The Knowing-Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
28. Sink, D. and Morris, W.T. (1995), By What Method?, (with Johnston, C.J.), Industrial Engineering & Management Press, Norcross, GA.
29. Van Aken, E.M., Van Goubergen, D. and Letens, G. (2003), "Integrated enterprise transformation: case application in engineering project work in the Belgian Armed Forces", Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 3-16.