Quality and the scholarship of teaching: Learning from subject review

Quality in Higher Education

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 231-241

  Macfarlane, Bruce ^b   Ottewill, Roger ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WEST LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23444443318     PISSN: 13538322     EISSN: 14701081     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1353832042000299513     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Andresen, L. 2000. ‘A usable, trans-disciplinary conception of scholarship’. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(2): pp. 137–53
2. Business Education Support Team(BEST) 2002 ‘Best funds available for an Analysis of the QAA Subject Review’ http://www.business.ltsn.ac.uk/news/QAA%20Review.htm accessed 15/10/02
3. Biggs J, 1999 Teaching for Quality Learning at University (Buckingham, Society for Research in Higher Education/Open University Press)
4. Boyer E, 1990 Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate (Princeton, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching)
5. Brown, R. 2003. ‘What future for higher education?’. Higher Education Review, 35(3): pp. 3–22
6. Dearing R, 1997 The National Committee of Inquiry in Higher Education: Report of the National Committee (London, NCIHE)
7. Fry H, Ketteridge S, Marshall S, 1999 A Handbook for Teaching & Learning in Higher Education: enhancing academic practice (London, Kogan-Page)
8. Harvey, L. 1995. ‘Editorial’. Quality in Higher Education, 1(1): pp. 5–12
9. Harvey, L, and Green, D. 1993. ‘Defining Quality’. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1): pp. 9–34
10. Hutchings P, Schulman L, 1999 ‘The scholarship of teaching: new elaborations, new developments’ Change September/October pp. 11–15
11. Kreber, C. 2002. ‘Controversy and consensus on the scholarship of teaching’. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2): pp. 151–67
12. Kreber, C, and Cranton, P. 2000. ‘Exploring the scholarship of teaching’. Journal of Higher Education, 71: pp. 476–96
13. Macfarlane B, Ottewill R, (Eds.) 2001 Effective Learning and Teaching in Business and Management (London, Kogan Page)
14. McGill I, Beaty L, 1995 Action Learning: a guide for professional, management and educational development (London, Kogan Page)
15. Marriott, N, and Marriott, P. 2003. ‘Student learning style preferences and undergraduate academic performance at two UK universities’. International Journal of Management Education, 3(1): pp. 4–13
16. Marton, F, and Saljo, R. 1976. ‘On qualitative differences in learning’. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46: pp. 4–11
17. Moon J, 1999 Reflection in Learning & Professional Development: theory & practice (London, Kogan Page)
18. Morehead, J, and Shedd, P. 1996. ‘Student interviews: a vital role in the scholarship of teaching’. Innovative Higher Education, 20: pp. 261–69
19. Nicholls G, 2001 Professional Development in Higher Education. New Dimensions and Directions (London, Kogan Page)
20. Proctor K, 1993 Tutors' professional knowledge of supervision and the implications for supervision practice in Calderhead, J. & Gates, P. (Eds.) Conceptualizing Reflection in Teacher Development (London, Falmer Press)
21. Prosser M, Trigwell K, 1999 Understanding Learning and Teaching: the experience of higher education (Buckingham, Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press)
22. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2000 Subject Review Handbook (September 2000–December, 2001) (Gloucester, QAA)
23. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001a Subject Overview Report: business and management Ref: QO5
24. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001b Subject Review Report, University of Southampton, Business and Management Ref: Q17
25. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001c Subject Review Report, Oxford Brookes University, Business and Management Ref: Q38
26. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001d Subject Review Report, Doncaster College, Business and Management Ref: Q61
27. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001e Subject Review Report, University of the West of England in Bristol, Business and Management Ref: Q120
28. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001f Subject Review Report, Bridgwater College, Business and Management Ref: Q130
29. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001g Subject Review Report, University of Reading, Business and Management Ref: Q188
30. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001h Subject Review Report, University of Greenwich, Business and Management Ref: Q220
31. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001i Subject Review Report, Leeds Metropolitan University, Business and Management Ref: Q248
32. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001j Subject Review Report, Crawley College, Business and Management Ref: Q340
33. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001k Subject Review Report, University of Central England in Birmingham, Business and Management Ref: Q409
34. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001l Subject Review Report, University of Wolverhampton, Business and Management Ref: Q422
35. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) 2001m Subject Review Report, Liverpool Hope, Business and Management Ref: Q514
36. Smith D, 1999 The changing idea of a university in Smith, D. & Langslow, A.K. (Eds.) The Idea of a University (London, Jessica Kingsley)
37. Times Higher Education Supplement (THES) 2001 ‘LSE leads revolt against QAA’, 23 March
38. Trigwell K, 2003 ‘Research on learning and teaching within an institution. A critical look at scholarship of teaching & learning’ Centre for Learning and Teaching–Sociology, Anthropology and Politics Conference April, Birmingham