Microeconomic analysis of the balanced scorecard: A case of Nokia Corporation

International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

Volumn 54, Issue 5-6, 2005, Pages 325-339

  Laitinen, Erkki K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VAASA   (Finland)

Author keywords

Balanced scorecard; Microeconomics; Performance measures; Prices; Resource allocation

Indexed keywords

EID: 23444433252     PISSN: 17410401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/17410400510604502     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Dorfman, R. and Steiner, P.O. (1954), "Optimal advertising and optimal quality", American Economic Review, Vol. 56, pp. 734-57.
2. Iimi, A. (2003), Demand for Cellular Phone Services under Product Differentation and Network Externalities, Development Policy Research Division, Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) Institute, Tokyo.
3. Ittner, C.D. and Larcker, D.F. (1998), "Innovations in performance measurement: trends and research implications", Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 10, pp. 205-38.
4. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1992), "The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 70, pp. 71-9.
5. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996), The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
6. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (2000), The Strategy-Focused Organization. How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
7. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (2001), "Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I", Accounting Horizons, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 87-104.
8. Kosonen, M. (1995), "Driving for excellence in performance - the role of the controller", Paper presented at the Business. Controller workshop, IIR Finland Oy, Helsinki, 27 September.
9. Laitinen, E.K. (2002), "A dynamic performance measurement system: evidence from small Finnish technology companies", Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 65-99.
10. Laitinen, E.K. (2004), "Towards a microeconomic approach of the balanced scorecard", Managerial Finance, Vol. 30 No. 6, pp. 1-27.
11. Malmi, T. (2001), "Balanced scorecards in Finnish companies: a research note", Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 207-20.
12. Neely, A., Mills, J., Platts, K., Gregory, M. and Richards, H. (1994), "Realizing strategy through measurement", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 140-52.
13. Norreklit, H. (2000), "The balance on the balanced scorecard - a critical analysis of some of its assumptions", Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 65-88.
14. Otley, D. (1999), "Performance management: a framework for management control systems research", Management Accounting Research., Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 363-82.
15. Rhode, P. and Stegeman, M. (2001), "Non-nash equilibria of Darwinian dynamics with applications to duopoly", International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 19, pp. 415-53.
16. Simons, R. (2000), Performance Measurement & Control Systems for Implementing Strategy, Text & Cases, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
17. Statistics Finland (2004), Development of Producer Prices in Technology Industries (in Finnish). Teknologiateollisuus ry, Helsinki.