Questionnaire based evaluation of prostate biopsy complication comparing different bioptic schemes

Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 40-45

  Damiano, Rocco ^a   Oliva, Andrea ^a   Cantiello, Francesco ^a   Esposito, Ciro ^a   Perdonà, Sisto ^b   De Sio, Marco ^b   Bitonti, Massimo ^a   Sacco, Rosario ^a   D'Armiento, Massimo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MAGNA GRAECIA OF CATANZARO   (Italy)

^b SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES   (Italy)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Morbidity; Pain; Prostate; Questionnaire

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; FINGER; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; RECTUM; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ECHOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION; FEVER; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HEMATURIA; INJURY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MICTURITION DISORDER; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLE; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE; PROSTATE TUMOR; QUESTIONNAIRE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SWEATING; URETHRA;

AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEVER; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HEMATURIA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLES; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SWEATING; URETHRA; URINATION DISORDERS;

EID: 0037368358     PISSN: 11243562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Perdona S, De Sio M, Damiano R, Oliva A, D'Armiento M. Ultrasound-guided biopsy: screening of prostate cancer with a single set of 14 systematic biopsies. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2000; 72:258-63
2. Presti JC, Chang JJ, Bhargava V, Shinohara K. The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. J Urol 2000; 163:179-80
3. Eskew LA, Bare RL and McCullough DL. Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1997; 157:1999
4. Levine MA, Ittman M, Melamed J, et al. Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 1998; 159:471
5. Nava L, Montorsi F, Consonni P, et al. Result of a prospective study comparing 6, 12 and 18 transrectal, ultrasound guided, sextant biopsies in patients with elevated PSA, normal DRE and normal prostatic ultrasound. J Urol 1997; suppl. 157:59, abstract 226
6. Naughton CK, Miller DC, Mager DE, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores: impact on cancer detection. J Urol 2000; 164:388
7. Scott J and Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain 1976; 2:175
8. Thomas T, Robinson C, Champion D, et al. Prediction and assessment of the severity of post operative pain and satisfaction with management. Pain 1998; 75:177
9. Irani J, Fournier F, Bon D, Gremmo E, Dorè B, Aubert J. Patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound - guided biopsy of the prostate. Br J Urol 1997; 79:608-10
10. Collins GN, Lloyd SN, Hehir M, McKelvie GB. Multiple transrectal ultrasound - guided prostatic biopsies - true morbidity and patient acceptance. Br J Urol 1993; 71:460-3
11. Issa MM, Bux S, Chun T et al. A randomized prospective trial of intrarectal lidocaine for pain control during transrectal prostate biopsy: the Emory University experience. J Urol 2000; 164:397
12. Naughton CK, Ornstein DK, Smith DS, et al. Pain and morbidity of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized trial of 6 versus 12 cores. J. Urol 2000; 163:168