Breakdown of Universality in Quantum Chaotic Transport: The Two-Phase Dynamical Fluid Model

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 92, Issue 11, 2004, Pages

  Jacquod, Ph ^a   Sukhorukov, E V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAOS THEORY; DIFFRACTION; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTANCE; PHASE SEPARATION; PHASE SPACE METHODS; RANDOM PROCESSES; SCATTERING; SUPERCONDUCTING MATERIALS; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES; TWO PHASE FLOW;

CONDUCTANCE FLUCTUATIONS; MESOSCOPIC SYSTEMS; QUANTUM CHAOTIC SYSTEMS; RANDOM MATRIX THEORY (RMT);

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 2342618727     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.116801     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. B. L. Altshuler, JETP Lett. 41, 648 (1985); P. A. Lee and A. D. Stone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1622 (1985).
2. B. L. Altshuler, JETP Lett. 41, 648 (1985); P. A. Lee and A. D. Stone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1622 (1985).
3. A. Benoit, C. P. Umbach, R. B. Laibowitz, and R. A. Webb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2343 (1987); W. J. Skocpol, P. M. Mankiewich, R. E. Howard, L. D. Jackel, D. M. Tennant, and A. D. Stone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2347 (1987).
4. A. Benoit, C. P. Umbach, R. B. Laibowitz, and R. A. Webb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2343 (1987); W. J. Skocpol, P. M. Mankiewich, R. E. Howard, L. D. Jackel, D. M. Tennant, and A. D. Stone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2347 (1987).
5. H. U. Baranger and P. A. Mello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 142 (1994); R. A. Jalabert, J.-L. Pichard, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Europhys. Lett. 27, 255 (1994).
6. H. U. Baranger and P. A. Mello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 142 (1994); R. A. Jalabert, J.-L. Pichard, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Europhys. Lett. 27, 255 (1994).
7. M. Büttiker, IBM J. Res. Dev. 32, 317 (1988).
8. Ya. M. Blanter and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rep. 336, 1 (2000).
9. M. V. Berry, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 400, 229 (1985).
10. B. L. Altshuler and B. I. Shklovskii, Sov. Phys. JETP 64, 127 (1986).
11. G. P. Berman and G. M. Zaslavsky, Physica (Amsterdam) 91A, 450 (1978); M. V. Berry and N. L. Balasz, J. Phys. A 12, 625 (1979).
12. G. P. Berman and G. M. Zaslavsky, Physica (Amsterdam) 91A, 450 (1978); M. V. Berry and N. L. Balasz, J. Phys. A 12, 625 (1979).
13. M. G. Vavilov and A. I. Larkin, Phys. Rev. B 67, 115335 (2003).
14. -1 ln(M) is due to partial reflection at the boundary between the cavity and the contacts to the leads [9].
15. O. Agam, I. Aleiner, and A. Larkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3153 (2000); S. Oberholzer, E.V. Sukhorukov, and C. Schönenberger, Nature (London) 415, 765 (2002).
16. O. Agam, I. Aleiner, and A. Larkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3153 (2000); S. Oberholzer, E.V. Sukhorukov, and C. Schönenberger, Nature (London) 415, 765 (2002).
17. P. G. Silvestrov, M. C. Goorden, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. B 67, 241301 (2003).
18. J. Tworzydlo, A. Tajic, H. Schomerus, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. B 68, 115313 (2003).
19. A. Lodder and Yu. V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. B 58, 5783 (1998); D. Taras-Semchuk and A. Altland, Phys. Rev. B 64, 014512 (2001).
20. A. Lodder and Yu. V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. B 58, 5783 (1998); D. Taras-Semchuk and A. Altland, Phys. Rev. B 64, 014512 (2001).
21. Ph. Jacquod, H. Schomerus, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 207004 (2003); M. C. Goorden, Ph. Jacquod, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. B 68, 220501(R) (2003).
22. Ph. Jacquod, H. Schomerus, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 207004 (2003); M. C. Goorden, Ph. Jacquod, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. B 68, 220501(R) (2003).
23. A. Kormanyos, Z. Kaufmann, C. J. Lambert, and J. Cserti, cond-mat/0309306.
24. I. L. Aleiner and A. I. Larkin, Phys. Rev. B 54, 14423 (1996); I. Adagideli, Phys. Rev. B 68, 233308 (2003).
25. I. L. Aleiner and A. I. Larkin, Phys. Rev. B 54, 14423 (1996); I. Adagideli, Phys. Rev. B 68, 233308 (2003).
26. A. Altland, B. D. Simons, and M. R. Zirnbauer, Phys. Rep. 359, 283 (2002).
27. I. Adagideli and Ph. Jacquod, Phys. Rev. B 69, 020503(R) (2004).
28. J. Tworzydlo, A. Tajic, and C. W. J. Beenakker, cond-mat/0311283.
29. Our model can be viewed as the Poincaré map defined on the boundary of the chaotic ballistic cavity [22].
30. L. E. Reichl, The Transition to Chaos (Springer, New York (1992).
31. S. Fishman, D. R. Grempel, and R. E. Prange, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 509 (1984); A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4536 (1996).
32. S. Fishman, D. R. Grempel, and R. E. Prange, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 509 (1984); A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4536 (1996).
33. S. Iida, H. A. Weidenmüller, and J. A. Zuk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 583 (1990).
34. Y. V. Fyodorov and H.-J.Sommers, JETP Lett. 72, 422 (2000); A. Ossipov, T. Kottos, and T. Geisel, Eurphys. Lett. 62, 719 (2003).
35. Y. V. Fyodorov and H.-J.Sommers, JETP Lett. 72, 422 (2000); A. Ossipov, T. Kottos, and T. Geisel, Eurphys. Lett. 62, 719 (2003).
36. j) with β= 2, strictly applies when the beam of electrons injected into the cavity has a similar spread in momentum and real-space coordinates. For the data shown in Fig. 2, we found a significantly better numerical rescaling with β ≈ 1.5 (not shown), which we relate to the anisotropy in the electron injection beam.
37. N. Argaman, Phys. Rev. B 53, 7035 (1996).