Quality of postimplementation review for enterprise resource planning systems

International Journal of Accounting Information Systems

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 25-49

  Nicolaou, Andreas I ^a  

^a BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Enterprise resource planning systems; ERP system effectiveness; Postimplementation review

Indexed keywords

EID: 2342599070     PISSN: 14670895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2004.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Barua A. Kriebel C. Mukhopadhyay T. Information technology and business value: an analytical and empirical investigation Inf. Syst. Res. 6 1 1995 3-23
2. Benchmarking Partners; 1998. ERP's second wave: maximizing the value of ERP-enabled processes. Deloitte Consulting Study.
3. Bingi P. Sharma M. Godla J. Critical factors affecting an ERP implementation Inf. Syst. Manage. 16 3 1999 7-16
4. Brynjolfsson E. The productivity paradox of information technology Commun. ACM 36 12 1993 66-77
5. Burch J.G. Systems analysis, design, and implementation 1992 Boyd - Fraser Boston (MA)
6. Caldwell B. Stein T. Beyond ERP: new IT agenda Information Week 1998 30-38 Nov. 30
7. Carlino J. Nelson S. Smith N. AMR research predicts enterprise applications market will reach $78 billion by 2004 2000 AMR Research Boston (MA)
8. Cerullo M.J. Post-implementation evaluation of computer systems CPA J. 52 May 1982 45-51
9. Chenhall R.H. Morris D. The role of post completion audits, managerial learning, environmental uncertainty and performance Behav. Res. Account. 5 1993 170-186
10. Clark L.E. A stitch in time: creating a knowledge transfer framework for your ERP implementation can mean the difference between losing and leveraging your most valuable asset Intell. Enterp. 3 October 20 2000 [Available online: http://www.intelligententerprise.com/001020/ feat3.shtml]
11. Davenport T.H. Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system Harvard Bus. Rev. 76 July/August 1998 121-131
12. Eishenhardt K.M. Building theories from case study research Acad. Manage. Rev. 14 4 1989 532-550
13. Eriksen L.B. Axline S. Markus M.L. What happens after "going live" with ERP systems? Competence centers can support effective institutionalization Proceedings of the American Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Milwaukee, WI 1999 776-778
14. Gable G.G. Large package software: a neglected technology? J. Glob. Inf. Manag. 6 Summer 1998 3-4
15. Galbraith J.R. Designing organizations 1995 Jossey-Bass San Francisco (CA)
16. Gelinas U. Sutton S. Accounting information systems 5th edition 2002 South Western Boston (MA)
17. Gordon L.A. Smith K.J. Post auditing capital expenditures and firm performance: the role of asymmetric information Account. Organ. Soc. 17 November 1992 741-757
18. Govindarajan V. Fisher J. Strategy, control systems, and resource sharing: effects on business-unit performance Acad. Manage. J. 33 June 1990 259-285
19. Grabski S.V. Leech S.A. Lu B. Successful implementation of ERP systems: risks and complementary factors Paper presented at the Seventh AIS Research Symposium, Scottsdale, Arizona 2000
20. Holland C.P. Light B. A stage maturity model for enterprise resource planning systems use Data Base Adv. Inf. Syst. 32 Spring 2001 34-45
21. Horngren C.T. Foster G. Cost accounting: a managerial emphasis 1991 Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
22. Hyde W. Technology (A special report): working together-when things go wrong: FoxMeyer Drug took a huge high-tech gamble; it didn't work Wall Street J. November 18 1996 18
23. Irving S. Managing ERP, post-implementation Manuf. Syst. 17 February 1999 24
24. James D. Wolf M.L. A second wind for ERP McKinsey Q. 2 2000 100-107
25. Jenson R.L. Johnson R.I. The enterprise resource planning system as a strategic solution Inf. Strategy 15 Summer 1999 28-33
26. Koch C. Slater D. Baatz E. The ABCs of ERP CIO 1999 [Accessed December 22. Available online: www.cio.com/forums/erp/edit/122299p.html].
27. Kumar K. Post implementation evaluation of computer-based information systems: current practices Commun. ACM 33 February 1990 203-212
28. Kumar K. Van Hillegersberg J. ERP: experiences and evolution Commun. ACM 43 April 2000 23-26
29. Loveman G. Information technology and the corporation of the 1990s: research studies. In Allen T, Scott-Morton M, editors, 1994. An assessment of the productivity impact of information technologies. MIT Working Paper. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1988.
30. Mabert A.M. Soni A. Venkataraman M.A. Enterprise resource planning survey of US manufacturing firms Prod. Invent. Manage. J. 41 2 2000 52-58
31. Mabert V.A. Soni A. Venkataramanan M.A. Enterprise resource planning: common myths versus evolving reality Bus. Horiz. May-June 2001 69-76
32. Mason J.O. Jr. Management information systems: the auditor's role Intern. Aud. September/October 1975 40-48
33. McCarthy W.E. David J.S. Sommer B.S. The evolution of enterprise information systems - from sticks and jars past journals and ledgers toward interorganizational webs of business objects and beyond 11th Annual Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages and Applications (Business Object Workshop II; OOPSLA' 96) 1996
34. META Group Enterprise Resource Management (ERM) solutions and their value 1999 META Group Publications Stamford (CT)
35. Morgan E.J. Tang Y.L. Post-implementation reviews of investment: evidence from a two-stage study Int. J. Prod. Econ. 30-31 July 1993 477-488
36. Murray M.G. Coffin G.W. A case study analysis of factors for success in ERP system implementations Proceedings of the Seventh Americas Conference on Information Systems, Boston, MA 2001 1012-1018
37. Myers M.D. Gordon L.A. Hamer M.M. Postauditing capital assets and firm performance: an empirical investigation Manage. Decis. Econ. 12 August 1991 317-327
38. Neale C.W. The benefits derived from post-auditing investment projects Omega 19 2/3 1991 113-120
39. Nicolaou A.I. Social control in information systems development Inf. Technol. People 12 2 1999 130-147
40. Nicolaou A.I. A contingency model of perceived effectiveness in accounting information systems: organizational coordination and control effects Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 1 September 2000 91-105
41. O'Leary D.E. Enterprise resource planning systems: systems, life cycle, electronic commerce, and risk 2000 Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge (UK)
42. Peterson W.J. Gelman L. Cooke D.P. ERP trends 2001 The Conference Board New York (NY) [Report 1292-01-RR]
43. Pike R.H. An empirical study of the adoption of sophisticated capital budgeting practices and decision-making effectiveness Account. Bus. Res. 18 Autumn 1988 341-351
44. Poston R. Grabski S. Financial impacts of enterprise resource planning implementations Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 2 2001 271-294
45. Roach S. America's technology dilemma: a profile of the information economy. Special economic study, Morgan Stanley and Co., 1987
46. Ross J.W. Vitale M.R. The ERP revolution: surviving vs. thriving Inf. Syst. Front. 2 2 2000 233-241
47. Scott J.E. Vessey I. Implementing enterprise resource planning systems: the role of learning from failure Inf. Syst. Front. 2 2 2000 213-232
48. Soh C. Kien S.S. Tay-Yap J. Cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution? Commun. ACM 43 April 2000 47-51
49. Sprott D. Componentizing the enterprise application packages Commun. ACM 43 April 2000 63-69
50. Stein T. SAP installation scuttled - unisource cites internal problems for $168 M write-off Information Week 1998 6 January 26
51. Stephanou C.J. The selection process of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Long Beach, CA 2000 988-991
52. Ward J. Taylor P. Bond P. Evaluation and realisation of IS/IT benefits: an empirical study of current practice Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 4 1996 214-225
53. Weill P. The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: a study of the valve manufacturing sector Inf. Syst. Res. 3 December 1992 307-333
54. Wilder C. Davis B. False starts, strong finishes Information Week 1998 41-53 Nov. 30
55. Yin R. Case study research: design and methods 2nd edition 1994 Sage Beverly Hills (CA)
56. Zaheer A. Venkatraman N. Determinant of electronic integration in the insurance industry: an empirical test Manage. Sci. 40 May 1994 549-566
57. Zimmerman J.L. Accounting for decision making and control 1995 Irwin Chicago (IL)