The most probable trajectory for ion flux through large-pore channel

Solid State Ionics

Volumn 168, Issue 3-4, 2004, Pages 235-243

  Bransburg Zabary, S ^a   Nachliel, E ^a   Gutman, M ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Dielectric constant; Electrostatic potential; Geminate recombination; Large pore channel; Most probable trajectory; Proton diffusion

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DIFFUSION; DISSOCIATION; FLUORESCENCE; IONS; LASER BEAMS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PERMITTIVITY; PROBABILITY; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIAL; GEMINATE RECOMBINATION; LARGE-PORE CHANNEL; MOST PROBABLE TRAJECTORY; PROTON DIFFUSION;

PROTEINS;

EID: 2342570829     PISSN: 01672738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2003.02.003     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Karshikoff A., et al. Electrostatic properties of two porin channels from Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 240(4):1994;372-384.
2. Hoyles M., Kuyucak S., Chung S.H. Energy barrier presented to ions by the vestibule of the biological membrane channel. Biophys. J. 70(4):1996;1628-1642.
3. Chung S.H., et al. Study of ionic currents across a model membrane channel using Brownian dynamics. Biophys. J. 75(2):1998;793-809.
4. Shimoni E., et al. Gaugement of the inner space of the apomyoglobin's heme binding site by a single free diffusing proton: I. Proton in the cavity. Biophys. J. 64(2):1993;472-479.
5. Gutman M., et al. Quantitation of physical-chemical properties of the aqueous phase inside the phoE ionic channel. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1109(2):1992;141-148.
6. Sansom M.S., et al. The dielectric properties of water within model transbilayer. Biophys. J. 73:1997;2404-2415.
7. Phale P.S., et al. Role of charged residues at the ompf porin channel constriction probed by mutagenesis and simulation(,). Biochemistry. 40(21):2001;6319-6325.
8. Schirmer T., Phale P.S. Brownian dynamics simulation of ion flow through porin channels. J. Mol. Biol. 294(5):1999;1159-1167.
9. Krissinel E.B., Agmon N. Spherical symmetric diffusion problem. J. Comput. Chem. 17(9):1996;1085-1098.
10. Koebnik R., Locher K.P., Van Gelder P. Structure and function of bacterial outer membrane proteins: barrels in a nutshell. Mol. Microbiol. 37(2):2000;239-253.
11. Honig B., Nicholls A. Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. Science. 268(5214):1995;1144-1149.
12. Nielsen J.E., et al. Improving macromolecular electrostatics calculations. Protein Eng. 12(8):1999;657-662.
13. Jakobsson E. Using theory and simulation to understand permeation and selectivity in ion channels. Methods. 14(3):1998;342-351.
14. S. Bransburg-Zabary, Reconstruction of the ion flux through the conducting trajectories of large pore channels, PhD thesis. 2001.
15. Pines E., Huppert D., Agmon N. Geminate recombination in excited-state proton transfer reaction: numerical solution of the Debye-Smoluchowski equation with back-reaction boundary conditions. J. Chem. Phys. 88:1988;5620-5630.
16. Gutman M., Nachliel E. The dynamic aspects of proton transfer processes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1015:1990;391-414.
17. Gutman M., Nachliel E., Tsfadia Y. Propogation of protons at the water membrane interface microscopic evaluation of macroscopic process. Disalvo E.A., Simon S.A. Permeability and Stability. 1995;259-276 CRS Press, London.
18. Riter R.E., Undiks P.E., Levinger N.E. Impact of counterion on water motion in AerosolOT reverse micelles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120(24):1998;6062-6067.
19. Huppert D., Kolodney E., Gutman M., Nachliel E. The effect of water activity on the rate constant of proton dissociation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104:1982;6944-6953.
20. Pines E.H.D. Salt effect in photo=acids quantum yield measurments: demonstration of the geminate recombination role in the deprotonation reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111:1989;4096-4097.
21. Rand R.P., et al. Variation in hydration forces between neutral phospholipid bilayers: evidence for hydration attraction. Biochemistry. 27(20):1988;7711-7722.
22. Gutman M., Nachliel E., Huppert D. Direct measurement of proton transfer as a probing reaction for the microenvironment of the apomyoglobin heme-binding site. Eur. J. Biochem. 125(1):1982;175-181.
23. Gutman M., Huppert D., Nachliel E. Kinetic studies of proton transfer in the microenvironment of a binding site. Eur. J. Biochem. 121(3):1982;637-642.
24. Tieleman D.P., Berendsen H.J. A molecular dynamics study of the pores formed by Escherichia. Biophys. J. 74:1998;2786-2801.
25. Schmid B., et al. Porin mutants with new channel properties. Protein Sci. 7:1998;1603-1611.
26. Van Gelder P., et al. Pore functioning of outer membrane protein PhoE of Escherichia coli: mutagenesis of the constriction loop L3. Protein Eng. 10(6):1997;699-706.
27. Bauer K., et al. One single lysine residue is responsible for the special interaction between polyphosphate and the outer membrane porin PhoE of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 264(28):1989;16393-16398.
28. Robinson R.A.R.H. Strokes Electrolyte Solutions. 1959;Butterworths Publications.
29. Benz R., Buer K. Permiation of hydrophylic molecules through the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria. Eur. J. Biochem. 176:1988;1-19.
30. Smart O.S., et al. A novel method for structure-based prediction of ion channel. Biophys. J. 72:1997;1109-1126.