Information technology and organizational slack

International Journal of Accounting Information Systems

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 51-63

  Dehning, Bruce ^a   Dow, Kevin E ^b   Stratopoulos, Theophanis ^c  

^a CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

Information technology; Organizational slack; Productivity paradox

Indexed keywords

EID: 2342563799     PISSN: 14670895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2004.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anderson E. Fornell C. Rust R. Customer satisfaction, productivity, and profitability: differences between goods and services Mark. Sci. 16 2 1997 129-145
2. Baily M. Competition, regulation, and efficiency in service industries Brookings Pap. Econ. Act., Microecon. 2 1993 71-130
3. Bakos Y. "The productivity payoff of computers," A review of the computer revolution: an economic perspective by Daniel E. Sichel Science 1998 52 July 3
4. Bartolomew D. Caterpillar digs in Information Week 1993 36-41 [June 7]
5. Bharadwaj A. Resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation MIS Q. 24 1 2000 69-196
6. Bharadwaj A. Bharadwaj S. Konsynski B. Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's q Manage. Sci. 45 6 1999 1008-1024
7. Bourgeois L.J. On the measurement of organizational slack Acad. Manage. Rev. 6 1 1981 29-39
8. Brynjolfsson E. The productivity paradox of information technology: review and assessment Commun. ACM 1993 67-77
9. Brynjolfsson E. Hitt L. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems Manage. Sci. 42 1996 541-558 [April].
10. Chakravarthy B. Measuring strategic performance Strateg. Manage. J. 7 1986 437-458
11. Champy J. What went wrong at Oxford Health? Computerworld 1998 78
12. Cyert R. March J. A behavioral theory of organizational objectives In: Haire M. (Ed.), Modern organization theory 1959 76-90 Wiley New York (NY)
13. Cyert R. March J. A behavioral theory of the firm 2nd ed. 1992 Blackwell Cambridge (MA)
14. Damanpour F. The adoption of technological, administrative and ancillary innovations: impact of organizational factors J. Manage. 1987 675-688
15. Davenport T. Process innovation 1993 Harvard Business School Press Boston (MA)
16. Davenport T. Business process reengineering: its past, present, and possible future 1995 Harvard Business School Press-Teaching Note Boston (MA)
17. Davenport T. Short J. The new industrial engineering: information technology and business process redesign Sloan Manage. Rev. 1990 11-27
18. Hammer M. Reengineering work: don't automate, obliterate Harvard Bus. Rev. 1990 104-112
19. Hoffman T. New York fines Oxford Health over computer billing problems Computerworld 32 1 1998 8
20. Im K.S. Dow K.E. Grover V. A reexamination of IT investment and the market value of the firm-an event study methodology Inf. Syst. Res. 12 1 2001 103-117
21. Kettinger W. Grover V. Guhan S. Segors A. Strategic information systems revisited: a study in sustainability and performance MIS Q. 18 1 1994 31-58
22. Martinsons M. Martinsons V. Rethinking the value of IT, again Commun. ACM 45 7 2002 25-26
23. Miller K.D. Leiblein M.J. Corporate risk-return relations: returns variability versus downside risk Acad. Manage. J. 39 1 1996 91-122 [February].
24. Oliner S.D. Sichel D.E. Computers and output growth revisited: how big is the puzzle? Brookings Pap. Econ. Act. 2 1994 273-334
25. Roach S. Service under siege-the restructuring imperative Harvard Bus. Rev. 1991 82-92
26. Singh J.V. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making Acad. Manage. J. 29 1986 562-585
27. Stratopoulos T. Dehning B. Does successful investment in information technology solve the productivity paradox? Inf. Manage. 38 2 2000 103-117
28. US Department of Commerce Digital economy 2002 2002 Economics and Statistics Administration Washington (DC)
29. Wally S. Fong C. Effects of firm performance, organizational slack, and debt on entry timing. A study of ten emerging product markets in USA Ind. Innov. 7 2 2002 169-183