The role of vision in spatial representation

Cortex

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 281-290

  Chokron, Sylvie ^a,b   Colliot, Pascale ^a,c   Bartolomeo, Paolo ^d,e  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b Service de Neurologie   (France)

^c Ctr Medicine Physique Readaptation   (France)

^d INSERM   (France)

^e HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Attention; Neglect; Representation; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRAWING; EXPERIMENTATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGERY; MALE; MEMORY; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORY; TREATMENT PLANNING; VISION;

EID: 2342523940     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70123-0     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Anderson B. Spared awareness for the left side of internal visual images in patients with left-sided extrapersonal neglect. Neurology, 43: 213-216, 1993.
2. Azouvi P, Samuel C, Louis-Dreyfus A, Bernati T, Bartolomeo P, Beis JM, Chokron S, Leclercq M, Marchal F, Martin Y, De Montety G, Olivier S, Perennou D, Pradat-Diehl P, Prairial C, Rode G, Sieroff E, Wiart L and Rousseaux M. Sensitivity of clinical and behavioural tests of spatial neglect after right hemisphere stroke. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 73: 160-166, 2002.
3. Bartolomeo P. The relationship between visual perception and visual mental imagery: A reappraisal of the neuropsychological evidence. Cortex, 38: 357-378, 2002.
4. Bartolomeo P and ChokroN S. Left unilateral neglect or right hyperattention? Neurology, 53: 2023-2027, 1999a.
5. Bartolomeo P and Chokron S. Egocentric frame of reference: Its role in spatial bias after right hemisphere lesions. Neuropsychologia, 37: 881-894, 1999b.
6. Bartolomeo P and Chokron S. Levels of impairment in unilateral neglect. In F Boller and J Grafman (Eds), Handbook of Neuropsychology. 2nd ed., Vol. 4.) Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 2001a, pp. 67-98.
7. Bartolomeo P and Chokron S. Visual awareness relies on exogenous orienting of attention: evidence from unilateral neglect (Commentary on O'Regan and Noë: A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24: 939-1031, 2001b.
8. Bartolomeo P and Chokron S. Can we change our vantage point to explore imaginal neglect? (Commentary on Pylyshyn: Mental imagery: In search of a theory). Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25: 157-238, 2002.
9. Bartolomeo P, D'Erme P and Gainotti G. The relationship between visuospatial and representational neglect. Neurology, 44: 1710-1714, 1994.
10. Bisiach E, Capitani E, Luzzatti C and Perani D. Brain and conscious representation of outside reality. Neuropsychologia, 19: 543-551, 1981.
11. Bisiach E, Geminiani G, Berti A and Rusconi ML. Perceptual and premotor factors of unilateral neglect. Neurology, 40: 1278-1281, 1990.
12. Bisiach E and Luzzatti C. Unilateral neglect of representational space. Cortex, 14: 129-133, 1978.
13. Bisiach E and Vallar G. Unilateral neglect in humans. In F Boller and M Behrmann (Eds), Disorders of Visual Behavior. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 4: 459-502, 2000.
14. Chedru F. Space representation in unilateral spatial neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 39: 1057-1061, 1976.
15. Chedru F, Leblanc M and Lhermitte F. Visual searching in normal and brain-damaged subjects. Cortex, 9: 94-111, 1973.
16. Chokron S and Bartolomeo P. Réduire expérimentalement la négligence spatiale unilatérale: Revue de la littérature et implications théoriques. Revue de Neuropsychologie, 9: 129-165, 1999.
17. Chokron S, Bernard JM and Imbert M. Length representation in each hemispace: An adaptation of the line bisection paradigm. Cortex, 33: 47-64, 1997.
18. Chokron S, Colliot P, Auclair L and Bartolomeo P. Effect of gaze direction on tactilo-kinesthetic perception. Brain and Cognition, 48: 312-317, 2002.
19. Chokron S, Colliot P, Bartolomeo P, Rhein F, Eusop E, Vassel P and Ohlmann T. Visual, proprioceptive and tactile performance in left neglect patients. Neuropsychologia, 40: 1965-1976, 2002.
20. Chokron S and De Agostini M. Reading habits influence aesthetic preference. Brain Research: Cognitive, 10: 45-49, 2000.
21. Cubelli R, Nichelli P, Bonito V, De Tanti A and Inzaghi MG. Different patterns of dissociation in unilateral spatial neglect. Brain and Cognition, 15: 139-159, 1991.
22. Delatollas G, De Agostini M, Jallon P, Poncet M, Rey M and Lellouch J. Mesure de la préférence manuelle par autoquestionnaire dans la population française adulte. Revue de Psychologie Appliquée, 38: 117-136, 1988.
23. Di Pellegrino G. Clock-drawing in a case of left visuo-spatial neglect: a deficit of disengagement? Neuropsychologia, 33: 353-358, 1995.
24. Gainotti G. The role of spontaneous eye movements in orienting attention and in unilateral neglect. In IH Robertson and JC Marshall (Eds), Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies. Hove (UK): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993, pp. 107-122.
25. Gainotti G, D'Erme P and Bartolomeo P. Early orientation of attention toward the half space ipsilateral to the lesion in patients with unilateral brain damage. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 54: 1082-1089, 1991.
26. Gentilini M, Barbieri C, De Renzi E and Faglioni P. Space exploration with and without the aid of vision in hemisphere-damaged patients. Cortex, 25: 643-651, 1989.
27. Halligan P and Marshall JC. Completion in visuo-spatial neglect: A case study. Cortex, 30: 685-694, 1994.
28. Hjaltason H, Caneman G and Tegner R. Visual and tactile rod bisection in unilateral neglect. Cortex, 29: 593-588, 1993.
29. Hjaltason H and Tegner R. Darkness improves line bisection in unilateral spatial neglect. Cortex, 28: 353-358, 1992.
30. Kinsbourne M. The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychologica, 33: 193-201, 1970a.
31. Kinsbourne M. A model for the mechanism of unilateral neglect of space. Transactions of the American Neurological Association, 95: 143-146, 1970.
32. Kosslyn SM. Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press, 1994.
33. Ladavas E, Umiltà C, Ziani P, Brogi A and Minarini M. The role of right side objects in left side neglect: A dissociation between perceptual and directional motor neglect. Neuropsychologia, 31: 761-773, 1993.
34. Mark VW, Kooistra CA and Heilman KM. Hemispatial neglect affected by non-neglect stimuli. Neurology, 38: 1207-1211, 1988.
35. Marshall JC and Halligan PW. Imagine only the half of it. Nature, 364: 193-194, 1993.
36. Meador KJ, Loring DW, Bowers D and Heilman KM. Remote memory and neglect syndrome. Neurology, 37: 522-526, 1987.
37. Mesulam MM. Attention, confusional states and neglect. In MM Mesulam (Ed), Principles of Behavioral Neurology. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis, pp. 125-168, 1985.
38. Pizzamiglio L, Vallar G and Doricchi F. Gravitational inputs modulate visuospatial neglect. Experimental Brain Research, 117: 341-345, 1997.
39. Posner MI. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32: 3-25, 1980.
40. Posner MI, Walker JA, Friedrich FJ and Rafal RD. Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 4: 1863-1864, 1984.
41. Rode G and Perenin MT. Temporary remission of representational hemineglect through vestibular stimulation. Neuroreport, 5: 869-872, 1994.
42. Rode G, Perenin MT and Boisson D. Neglect of the physical space and neglect of the representational space. Consequences for rehabilitation. Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique, 39: 165-169, 1996.
43. Rode G, Rossetti Y, Badan M and Boisson D. Prism adaptation improves representational neglect. Neuropsychologia, 39: 1250-1254, 2001.
44. Rossetti Y, Rode G, Pisella L, Farne A, Li L, Boisson D and Perenin MT. Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature, 395: 166-169, 1998.
45. Rousseaux M, Beis JM, Pradat-Diehl P, Martin Y, Bartolomeo P, Bernati T, Chokron S, Leclercq M, Louis-Dreyfus A, Marchal F, Perennou D, Prairial C, Rode G, Samuel C, Sieroff E, Wiart L and Azouvi P. Normalisation d'une batterie de dépistage de la négligence spatiale. Etude de l'effet de l'âge, du niveau d'éducation, du sexe, de la main et de la latéralité. Revue Neurologique, 157: 1385-1400, 2002.
46. Smania N, Bazoli F, Piva D and Guidetti G. Visuomotor imagery and rehabilitation of neglect. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78: 430-436, 1997.
47. Soroker N, Calamaro N, Glicksohn J and Myslobodsky MS. Auditory inattention in right-hemisphere-damaged patients with and without visual neglect. Neuropsychologia, 35: 249-256, 1997.
48. Ungerleider LG and Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. In DJ Ingle, MA Goodale and RJW Mansfield (Eds), Analysis of Visual Behavior. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press: pp. 549-586, 1982.
49. Vallar G, Rusconi ML, Geminiani G, Berti A and Cappa SF. Visual and nonvisual neglect after unilateral brain lesions: Modulation by visual input. International Journal of Neuroscience, 61: 229-239, 1991.
50. Vargo JM, Grachek RA and Rockswold GL. Light deprivation soon after frontal brain trauma accelerates recovery from attentional deficits and promotes functional normalization of basal ganglia. Journal of Trauma, 47: 265-272; discussion 273-264, 1999.
51. Vargo JM, Lai HV and Marshall JF. Light deprivation accelerates recovery from frontal cortical neglect: Relation to locomotion and striatal Fos expression. Behavioral Neurosciences, 112: 387-398, 1998.