Analytical study of the effect of wave number on the performance of local absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic scattering

Applied Numerical Mathematics

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 15-47

  Harari, Isaac ^a   Djellouli, Rabia ^b  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Absorbing boundary conditions; Acoustic scattering; Wave number

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC WAVE SCATTERING; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; INTERPOLATION; NUMBER THEORY; PERFORMANCE;

ABSORBING BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; WAVE NUMBER;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 2342481659     PISSN: 01689274     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2003.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Givoli D. Numerical Methods For Problems in Infinite Domains. Stud. Appl. Mech. vol. 33:1992;Elsevier, Amsterdam.
2. Astley R.J. Mapped spheroidal wave-envelope elements for unbounded wave problems. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 41:(7):1998;1235-1254.
3. Bettess P. Infinite Elements. 1992;Penshaw Press, Sunderland.
4. Burnett D.S., Holford R.L. An ellipsoidal acoustic infinite element. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 164:(1-2):1998;49-76.
5. Cipolla J.L., Butler M.J. Infinite elements in the time domain using a prolate spheroidal multipole expansion. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 43:(5):1998;889-908.
6. Harari I., Barai P., Barbone P.E. Numerical and spectral investigations of Trefftz infinite elements. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 46:(4):1999;553-577.
7. Chen H.S., Mei C.C. Oscillations and wave forces in a man-made harbor in the open sea. Tenth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics. 1974;573-594 Office of Naval Research, Department of the Navy, Cambridge, MA.
8. Grote M.J., Keller J.B. Nonreflecting boundary conditions for time-dependent scattering. J. Comput. Phys. 127:(1):1996;52-65.
9. Gustafsson B., Kreiss H.-O. Boundary conditions for time-dependent problems with an artificial boundary. J. Comput. Phys. 30:(3):1979;333-351.
10. Hagstrom T., Keller H.B. Exact boundary conditions at an artificial boundary for partial differential equations in cylinders. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 17:(2):1986;322-341.
11. Givoli D. Exact representations on artificial interfaces and applications in mechanics. AMR. 52:(11):1999;333-349.
12. Antoine X., Barucq H., Bendali A. Bayliss-Turkel-like radiation conditions on surfaces of arbitrary shape. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 229:(1):1999;184-211.
13. Bayliss A., Gunzburger M., Turkel E. Boundary conditions for the numerical solution of elliptic equations in exterior regions. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 42:(2):1982;430-451.
14. Engquist B., Majda A. Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves. Math. Comp. 31:(139):1977;629-652.
15. Givoli D., Patlashenko I., Keller J.B. High-order boundary conditions and finite elements for infinite domains. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 143:(1-2):1997;13-39.
16. Jones S., Douglas. Surface radiation conditions. IMA J. Appl. Math. 41:(1):1988;21-30.
17. Safjan A.J. Highly accurate non-reflecting boundary conditions for finite element simulations of transient acoustics problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 152:(1-2):1998;175-193.
18. Givoli D., Keller J.B. Nonreflecting boundary conditions for elastic waves. Wave Motion. 12:(3):1990;261-279.
19. Djellouli R., Farhat C., Macedo A., Tezaur R. Finite element solution of two-dimensional acoustic scattering problems using arbitrarily shaped convex artificial boundaries. J. Comput. Acoust. 8:(1):2000;81-99.
20. Shirron J.J., Babuška I. A comparison of approximate boundary conditions and infinite element methods for exterior Helmholtz problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 164:(1-2):1998;121-139.
21. Tezaur R., Macedo A., Farhat C., Djellouli R. Three-dimensional finite element calculations in acoustic scattering using arbitrarily shaped convex artificial boundaries. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 53:(6):2002;1461-1476.
22. Kriegsmann G.A., Taflove A., Umashankar K.R. A new formulation of electromagnetic wave scattering using an on-surface radiation boundary condition approach. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagation. 35:(2):1987;153-161.
23. Antoine X. Fast approximate computation of a time-harmonic scattered field using the on-surface radiation condition method. IMA J. Appl. Math. 66:(1):2001;83-110.
24. Teymur M. Assessment of the surface radiation condition by reference to acoustic scattering by a hard sphere. IMA J. Appl. Math. 48:(3):1992;217-241.
25. Teymur M. A comparative investigation of the surface radiation condition in electromagnetics. Wave Motion. 16:(1):1992;1-21.
26. E. Turkel, C. Farhat, U. Hetmaniuk, Improved accuracy for the Helmholtz equation in unbounded domains, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., submitted for publication.
27. Grote M.J., Keller J.B. On nonreflecting boundary conditions. J. Comput. Phys. 122:(2):1995;231-243.
28. Colton D., Kress R. Inverse Acoustic and Electromagnetic Scattering Theory. second ed. 1998;Springer, Berlin.
29. Lax P.D., Phillips R.S. Scattering Theory. second ed. 1989;Academic Press, Boston, MA.
30. Sanchez-Hubert J., Sánchez-Palencia E. Vibration and Coupling of Continuous Systems. 1989;Springer, Berlin.
31. Stakgold I. Boundary Value Problems of Mathematical Physics, vol. II. 1968;Macmillan, New York.
32. Wilcox C.H. Scattering Theory for the d'Alembert Equation in Exterior Domains. 1975;Springer, Berlin.
33. Kallivokas L.F., Bielak J., MacCamy R.C. A simple impedance-infinite element for the finite element solution of the three-dimensional wave equation in unbounded domains. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 147:(3-4):1997;235-262.
34. Ramahi O.M. Stability of absorbing boundary conditions. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagation. 47:(4):1999;593-599.
35. Tam C.K.W., Webb J.C. Radiation boundary condition and anisotropy correction for finite difference solutions of the Helmholtz equation. J. Comput. Phys. 113:(1):1994;122-133.
36. Harari I., Hughes T.J.R. Analysis of continuous formulations underlying the computation of time-harmonic acoustics in exterior domains. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 97:(1):1992;103-124.
37. Abramowitz M., Stegun I.A. Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Appl. Math. Ser. vol. 55:1972;US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC.
38. Thompson L.L., Pinsky P.M. A space-time finite element method for the exterior structural acoustics problem: Time-dependent radiation boundary conditions in two space dimensions. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 39:(10):1996;1635-1657.
39. Teymur M. A note on higher-order surface radiation conditions. IMA J. Appl. Math. 57:(2):1996;137-163.
40. Geers T.L. Doubly asymptotic approximations for transient motions of submerged structures. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 64:(5):1978;1500-1508.
41. Astley R.J. Infinite elements for wave problems: A review of current formulations and an assessment of accuracy. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 49:(7):2000;951-976.
42. Astley R.J., Hamilton J.A. Numerical studies of conjugated infinite elements for acoustical radiation. J. Comput. Acoust. 8:(1):2000;1-24.
43. Cipolla J.L. Axisymmetric modal impedance properties of some infinite element formulatons. Boll. Geofis. Teor. Appl. 40:(1):1999;90-91. Supplement.
44. Geers T.L., Toothaker B.J. Third-order doubly asymptotic approximations for computational acoustics. J. Comput. Acoust. 8:(1):2000;101-120.
45. Courant R., Hilbert D. Methods of Mathematical Physics, vol. I. 1953;Interscience, New York.
46. Weisstein E.W. CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics. 1999;CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.