Effects of contrasting equivalent teaching approaches on student ratings

Journal of Allied Health

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 70-74

  Bovee, Michael L ^a   Gran, Donald F ^a  

^a PALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEACHING; UNIVERSITY; ADULT; CHIROPRACTIC; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PARAMEDICAL PERSONNEL; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPINE; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ALLIED HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHIROPRACTIC; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FACULTY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; IOWA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPINE; STUDENTS, HEALTH OCCUPATIONS; TEACHING;

EID: 2342481115     PISSN: 00907421     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Whitman N. Learning and teaching styles: implications for teachers of family medicine. Fam Med 1996;28:321-325.
2. Barrows HS, Tamblyn RM. Problem-based learning: an approach to medical education. New York: Springer; 1980.
3. Gatterman MI. Teaching-learning options for the study of chiropractic principles: a case study. J Chiropractic Educ 1992;6(3):93-103.
4. Mrozek JP. Problem solving facilitation in chiropractic education using the portable patient problem pack (P4). J Chiropractic Educ 1992;6(3):105-110.
5. Sandefur R. Use of problem-based learning methods in the chiropractic college classroom. J Chiropractic Educ 1990;4(3):81-83.
6. Good CJ. The McMaster problem based learning method: an analysis and its relevance to chiropractic education. J Chiropractic Educ 1992;6(3):87.
7. Swenson RL. Process of curriculum change at the National College of Chiropractic. J Chiropractic Educ 1997;10(4):S71-S75.
8. Jacobs GE. Proceedings of the Fourth ACC Educational Conference. J Chiropractic Educ 1997;10(4):S3-S65.
9. Traina AD, Goubran E, Gour NJ, et al. Description of integrated competency examination: tools to assess the chiropractic curriculum effectiveness and students competency levels. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1996;19:463-468.
10. Arambula-Greenfield T Implementing problem-based learning in a college science class. J Coll Sci Teaching 1996;26:26-30.
11. Frost M. An analysis of the scope and value of problem-based learning in the education of health care professionals. J Adv Nurs 1996;24:1047-1053.
12. Barrington DL. Planning practice-based clinical teaching. Aust Fam Physician 1997;26:56-57.
13. Saarinen-Rahiika H, Binkley JM, Hayes SH. Problem-based learning in physical therapy: a review of the literature and overview of the McMaster University experience. Phys Ther 1998;78:195-232.
14. Wetherell J, Mullins G, Winning T, et al. First-year responses to a new problem-based curriculum in dentistry. Aust Den J 1996;41:351-354.
15. Andrews M, Jones PR. Problem-based learning in an undergraduate nursing programme: a case study. J Adv Nurs 1996;23:357-365.
16. Richards BF, Ober P, Cariaga-Lo L, et al. Ratings of students' performances in a third-year internal medicine clerkship: a comparison between problem-based and lecture-based curricula. Acad Med 96;71:187-189.
17. Bovee ML. Problem solving exercise in a clinical science technique class. J Chiropractic Educ 1998;10(3):110-112.
18. Mennin SP, Friedman M, Skipper B, et al. Performances on the NBME I, II, and III by medical students in the problem-based learning and conventional tracks at the University of New Mexico. Acad Med 1993;68:616-624.
19. Bovee ML, Gran DF. Comparison of two teaching methods in a chiropractic clinical science course. J Allied Health 2000;29:157-160.
20. Vernon DTA, Blake RL. Does problem-based learning work?: a meta-analysis of evaluative research. Acad Med 1993;68:550-563.