Another ‘double movement’: The great transformation after the Cold War?

Review of International Studies

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 237-255

  Clark, Ian ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044529595     PISSN: 02602105     EISSN: 14699044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0260210501008105     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. K. Polanyi, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (New York: Farrar and Rinehart, 1944).
2. Polanyi, Great Transformation, p. 76.
3. T. Dunne, Inventing International Society: A History of the English School (Houndmills, UK: Macmillan, 1998).
4. I. Clark, The Post-Cold War Order: The Spoils of Peace (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).
5. P. W. Schroeder, ‘A New World Order: A Historical Perspective’, in B. Roberts (ed.), Order and Disorder after the Cold War: A Washington Quarterly Reader (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995).
6. Gerrit W. Gong, ‘China's Entry into International Society’, in H. Bull and A. Watson (eds.), The Expansion of International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984), p. 179.
7. N. J. Wheeler, Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).
8. M. Cox, G. John Ikenberry, and T. Inoguchi (eds.), American Democracy Promotion: Impulses, Strategies, and Impacts (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).
9. M. N. Barnett, ‘Bringing in the New World Order: Liberalism, Legitimacy, and the United Nations’, World Politics, 49:4 (1997), p. 544.
10. I. Hurd, ‘Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics’, International Organization, 53:2 (Spring 1999), p. 402.
11. A. Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 268-273; Hurd, ‘Legitimacy and Authority’.
12. R. Gilpin, War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 39-49;
13. G. John Ikenberry and M. W. Doyle, ‘Conclusion’ in Doyle and Ikenberry (eds.), New Thinking in International Relations Theory (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997), p. 274.
14. B. Buzan and R. Little, International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 349.
15. J. L. Gaddis, ‘The Cold War, the Long Peace, and the Future’, in M. J. Hogan (ed.), The End of the Cold War: Its Meaning and Implications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), p. 22.
16. B. Hansen and B. Heurlin, ‘Introduction’, in Hansen and Heurlin (eds.), The New World Order: Contesting Theories (Houndmills, UK: Macmillan, 2000), p. vii.
17. M. Cox, K. Booth, and T. Dunne, ‘Introduction: The Interregnum: Controversies in World Politics, 1989-99’, Review of International Studies, 25: Special Issue (December 1999), p. 4.
18. H. Patomaki, ‘What is it that Changed with the End of the Cold War? An Analysis of the Problem of Identifying and Explaining Change’, in P. Allan and K. Goldmann (eds.), The End of the Cold War: Evaluating Theories of InternationalRelations (Dordrecht, Holland: Martinus Nijhoff, 1992), p. 180.
19. C. Wight, ‘Incommensurability and Cross-Paradigm Communication: “What's the Frequency Kenneth?”’, Millennium, 25:2 (1996).
20. Buzan and Little, International Systems, pp. 11-12.
21. International Systems, p. 4.
22. M. C. Williams, ‘Modernity, Postmodernity and the New World Order’, in Hansen and Heurlin, New World Order, p. 82.
23. O. Waever, ‘Power, Principles and Perspectivism: Understanding Peaceful Change in Post-Cold War Europe’, in H. Patomaki (ed.), Peaceful Changes in World Politics (Tampere, Finland: Tampere Peace Research Institute, 1995), p. 259.
24. A. Osiander, The States System of Europe 1640-1990: Peacemaking and the Condition of International Stability (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).
25. C. Reus-Smit, The Moral Purpose of the State (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).
26. Reus-Smit, Moral Purpose, pp. 152-153.
27. R. B. Hall, National Collective Identity: Social Constructs and International Systems (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999).
28. Hall, National Collective Identity, p. 6.
29. National Collective Identity, p. 29.
30. S. D. Krasner, ‘Compromising Westphalia’, International Security, 20:3 (1995-1996);.
31. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).
32. G. John Ikenberry, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000).
33. Clark, Post-Cold War Order.
34. See Krasner, ‘Compromising Westphalia’, p. 140;
35. Osiander, States System of Europe, p. 14.
36. Osiander, States System of Europe, p. 5.
37. Ikenberry, After Victory, p. 4.
38. Clark, Post-Cold War Order.
39. Wheeler, Saving Strangers;
40. G. M. Lyons and M. Mastanduno (eds.), Beyond Westphalia? State Sovereignty and International Intervention (Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 1995).
41. Krasner, ‘Compromising Westphalia’, passim.
42. R. Steel, ‘Prologue: 1919-1945-1989’, in M. F. Boemeke, G. D. Feldman and E. Glaser (eds.), The Treaty of Versailles: A Reassessment after 75 Years (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 34.
43. P. Kennedy, ‘Conclusions’, in G. Lundestad (ed.), The Fall of Great Powers: Peace, Stability, and Legitimacy (Oslo and Oxford: Scandinavian and Oxford University Presses, 1994), p. 378.
44. Wheeler, Saving Strangers, p. 4.
45. J. D. Armstrong, Revolution and World Order: The Revolutionary State in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993);
46. P. F. Butler, ‘Legitimacy in a States-System: Vattel's Law of Nations’, in M. Donelan (ed.), The Reason of States (London: Allen and Unwin, 1978);
47. Barnett, ‘Bringing in the New World Order’;
48. Hurd, ‘Legitimacy and Authority’;
49. H. Kissinger, A World Restored: The Politics of Conservatism in a Revolutionary Era (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1957) and.
50. Diplomacy (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1994);
51. A. Watson, The Evolution of International Society (London: Routledge, 1992);
52. Wheeler, Saving Strangers; M. Wight, ‘International Legitimacy’, in H. Bull (ed.), Systems of States (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1977); and.
53. J. Williams, ‘Nothing Succeeds Like Success? Legitimacy in International Relations’, in B. Holden (ed.), The Ethical Dimensions of Global Change (Houndmills, UK: Macmillan, 1996).
54. Principally in T. M. Franck, The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990).
55. Wight, ‘International Legitimacy’.
56. Williams, ‘Nothing Succeeds like Success?’.
57. For example, Kissinger, A World Restored; R. Gilpin, ‘The Cycle of Great Powers: Has it Finally been Broken?’, in Lundestad, The Fall.
58. I use these terms in the sense developed by Hedley Bull. Pluralism refers to a view of international society within which shared norms extend only to procedural goals, whereas solidarism reflects an international society that shares ‘substantive’ or ‘purposive’ values. See Bull, ‘The Grotian Conception of International Society’, in H. Butterfield and M. Wight (eds.), Diplomatic Investigations (London: Allen and Unwin, 1966);
59. and The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (London: Macmillan, 1977).
60. K. Alderson and A. Hurrell, ‘Introduction’, in Alderson and Hurrell (eds.), Hedley Bull on International Society (Houndmills, UK: Macmillan, 2000), p. 9.
61. See J. G. Ruggie, Constructing the World Polity (London: Routledge, 1998), pp. 22-25.
62. Wheeler, Saving Strangers, p. 6.
63. Watson, The Evolution, p. 323.
64. Williams, ‘Nothing Succeeds like Success’, pp. 60-61.
65. Barnett, ‘Bringing in the New World Order’, p. 548.
66. I. L. Claude, ‘Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations’, International Organization, 20:3 (1966), p. 369.
67. Osiander, States System of Europe, p. 14.
68. Williams, ‘Nothing Succeeds like Success’, p. 40.
69. Watson, The Evolution, pp. 323-324.
70. On the ‘crisis of legitimacy’ caused by a gap between principle and practice, see also Hall, National Collective Identity; A. Claire Cutler, ‘Critical Reflections on the Westphalian Assumptions of International Law and Organization: A Crisis of Legitimacy’, Review of International Studies, 27:2 (2001).
71. Bull and Watson, The Expansion, pp. 6-7.
72. R. Roberston, Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture (London: Sage, 1992), p. 124.
73. Clark, Post-Cold War Order, Part 2.
74. ‘The Fall’, in Lundestad, The Fall, p. 385.
75. Ikenberry, After Victory, p. 270.
76. Clark, Post-Cold War Order, p. 249.
77. Ikenberry, After Victory, p. 259.
78. Watson, The Evolution, p. 315
79. In Lundestad, The Fall, p. 7.
80. E. Adler and M. Barnett (eds.), Security Communities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
81. Martin Shaw, Theory of the Global State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 214.
82. Shaw, Global State, pp. 214-215.
83. T. Barkawi and M. Laffey, ‘The Imperial Peace: Democracy, Force and Globalization’, European Journal of International Relations, 5:4 (1999), p. 419.
84. Clark, Globalization and International Relations Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), ch. 6.
85. Shaw, Global State, pp. 199-200.
86. A. Williams, Failed Imagination? New World Orders of the Twentieth Century (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998).
87. ‘Introduction’, in Bull and Watson, The Expansion, p. 2.