The likelihood of victim restitution in mock cases: Are the 'rules of the game' different from prison and probation?

Social Behavior and Personality

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 481-498

  Tsoudis, Olga ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Affect control theory; Punishment likelihoods; Victim restitution

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044519004     PISSN: 03012212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2000.28.5.481     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Martin, S. E. & Tonry, M. H. Eds. (1983). Research on sentencing: Search for reform. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
2. Boulden, J. C. (1988). The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984: New hope for substitute victim restitution? Valparaiso University Law Review, 23, 75-109.
3. Casper, J.D. & Benedict, K. M. (1993). The influence of outcome information and attitudes on juror decision making in search and seizure cases. In Reid Hastie (Ed.) Inside the Juror (pp.65-82) New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Crew, R. E. & Vancore, M. (1994). Managing victim restitution in Florida: An analysis of the implementation of FS 775.089. Justice System Journal, 17, 241-248.
5. Davis, R.C., Kunreuther, F. & Connick, E. (1984). Expanding the victim's role in the criminal court dispositional process: The results of an experiment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 491-505.
6. Davis, R. C. (1987). The changing role of victims in the court. Prosecutor's Brief, 10, 28-31.
7. Davis, R. C., Smith, B. & Hillenbrand, S. (1991). Increasing offender compliance with restitution orders. Judicature, 74, 245-248.
8. Dittenhoffer, T. & Ericson, R.V. (1983). The Victim/Offender Reconciliation Program: A message to Correctional Reformers. University of Toronto Law Journal, 33, 315.
9. Erez, E. & Tontodonato, P. (1990). Effect .of victim participation in sentencing on sentence outcomes. Criminology, 28, 451-474.
10. Tiffany, L. P., Avichain, Y. & Peters, G. W. (1975). A statistical analysis of sentencing in federal courts: Defendants convicted after trial, 1967-1968. Journal of Legal Studies, 4, 369-390.
11. Tsoudis, O. (2000-in press). Relation of affect control theory to the sentencing of criminals. Journal of Social Psychology, 140(4).
12. Tsoudis, O. (2000). The influence of empathy in mock criminal court cases: Adding to the affect control model. Submitted for publication.
13. Tsoudis, O. & Smith-Lovin, L. (1998). How bad was it? The effects of victim and perpetrator emotion on responses to criminal court vignettes. Social Forces, 77, 695-722.
14. Tsoudis, O. & Smith-Lovin, L. (2001-in press). Criminal identity: The key to situation construals in mock criminal court cases. Sociological Spectrum, 21(1).
15. Walsh, A. (1986). Placebo justice: Victim recommendations and offender sentences in sexual assault cases. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 77, 1126-1141.
16. Walster, E. (1966). Assignment of Responsibility for an Accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 73-79.
17. Welch, S., Gruhl, J. & Spohn, C. (1984). Sentencing: The influence of alternative measures of prior record. Criminology, 22, 215-227.