Agreement between stereoscopic photographs, clinical assessment, Heidelberg retina tomograph and digital stereoscopic optic disc camera in estimating vertical cup:disc ratio

Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 259-263

  Jayasundera, Thiran ^a   Danesh Meyer, Helen V ^a   Donaldson, Mark ^a   Gamble, Greg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Cup:disc ratio; DISCAM; Glaucoma; Heidelberg retina tomograph

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAMERA; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC DISK CUP; OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PHYSICIAN; STEREORADIOGRAPHY; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PHOTOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 23044513256     PISSN: 14426404     EISSN: 14429071     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2005.01000.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Sommer A, Pollack I, Maumenee AE. Optic disc parameters and onset of glaucomatous field loss. I. Methods and progressive changes in disc morphology. Arch Ophthalmol 1979; 97: 1444-8.
2. Pederson JE, Anderson DR. The mode of progressive disc cupping in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1980; 98: 490-5.
3. Varma R, Steinmann WC, Scott IU. Expert agreement in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1992; 99: 215-21.
4. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, Miller NR, Sommer A. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in measurement of optic disc characteristics. Ophthalmology 1988; 95: 350-6.
5. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1 (8476): 307-10.
6. Sung VC, Bhan A, Vernon SA. Agreement in assessing optic discs with a digital stereoscopic optic disc camera (Discam) and Heidelberg retina tomograph. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 196-202.
7. Ikram MK, Borger PH, Assink JJ, Jonas JB, Hofman A, de Jong PT. Comparing ophthalmoscopy, slide viewing, and semiautomated systems in optic disc morphometry. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 486-93.
8. Correnti AJ, Wollstein G, Price LL, Schuman JS. Comparison of optic nerve head assessment with a digital stereoscopic camera (discam), scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, and stereo photography. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 1499-505.
9. Bartz-Schmidt KU, Weber J, Heimann K. Validity of two-dimensional data obtained with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph as verified by direct measurements in normal optic nerve heads. Ger J Ophthalmol 1994; 3: 400-5.
10. Marcher Enterprises. Discam. Hereford, UK: Marcher Enterprises Limited, 2002.
11. Heidelberg Engineering. Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph II Operating Instructions Software, Version 1. 6. Dossenheim: Heidelberg Engineering, 2001.
12. Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GO. Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988; 29: 1151-8.
13. Jonas JB, Mardin CY, Grundler AE. Comparison of measurements of neuroretinal rim area between confocal laser scanning tomography and planimetry of photographs. Br J Ophthalmol 1998; 82: 362-6.